Academic Funding

A Quick Q&A on the REF With Its Creator Academic Funding
Rama Thirunamachandran

A Quick Q&A on the REF With Its Creator

December 17, 2014 1060

Rama Thirunamachandran

Rama Thirunamachandran

Think of a researcher measuring the trajectory of a laser beam in a university physics lab or a history professor digging through a church’s long-lost archives and their work can often feel far removed from life’s daily reality. But as the amount of funding the government is able to spend on research comes under pressure, so pressure is mounting on academics to show the impact of their work on the real world.

On December 18, universities and their staff will be keenly analysing data published in the Research Excellence Framework (REF), a national review of university research. For the first time, university research will be judged on its impact outside the world of academia. These results will later be used to inform how much research funding different universities receive.

The Conversation asked the man who developed the REF back in 2008, Rama Thirunamachandran, vice-chancellor and principal at Canterbury Christ Church University, to talk us through it.

Why is the REF so important?

A significant amount of public funding goes into research, so government quite understandably needs to ensure that the research coming out of this significant investment is of high quality.

Since 1986 there has been a national review of research done roughly every five or six years. It was initially called the Research Selectivity Exercise, then in 1992 it became the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) and in 2008 it became the Research Excellence Framework. The purpose is to assess the quality of research going on in universities through a profile of each subject area. These assessment profiles will then inform the amount of public funding going to subject areas at different universities.

The Conversation logo

This talk with Rama Thirunamachandran originally appeared at The Conversation, a Social Science Space partner site, under the title “Q&A: what is the REF and how is the quality of university research measured?”

What is new this year?

The important addition this year is the assessment of the impact of research. Panels of peer-reviewers assess the research submitted by universities for how much impact it has had on the real world.

How is it measured?

Research outputs, such as research publications, amount for 65 percent of the profile, impact is 20% and the research environment, which includes staff development and training of postgraduate researchers, counts for 15 percent of the overall quality profile. It is not individual academics who receive a rating, but the research subject area at a particular university. They will be given a starred level from one (the lowest) to four (highest), or listed as unclassified if the quality falls below the standard of nationally recognised research.

In the past, the results have shown a concentration of research excellence at a few universities. Will we see that same pattern this year?

The shift in the REF after the 2008 RAE, which I was responsible for, towards assessing universities through quality profiles allowed the system to identify pockets of excellence across a very wide range of universities. Each university has some pockets of excellence. But the majority of very high-quality research, defined as three star and four star – research which is world-leading, or research which is internationally excellent – is found in probably 20 or so universities in the country. But it’s important to note that the UK’s other universities do have a significant amount of research capability, some of which is internationally excellent.

What relation does the REF have to university funding?

The funding calculations don’t happen until the spring by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). Universities won’t know the funding implications when the REF results are announced. If their results are better than last time round, and better than the average improvement in the sector, they might possibly infer there might be a bit more money coming into their particular university.

But university research funding [in England] is dependent on how much money government provides for research to the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and that won’t be known until the new year. There is a fixed pot of money for research which will go from the government to HEFCE and then HEFCE will develop a formula to allocate those limited resources using the REF results.

HEFCE always gives highest priority to the highest rated research. Four-star rated quality research will get the highest levels of funding and three-star the next highest levels of funding. It’s likely that no other funding will be available for research rated as two star, one star and unclassified, simply because there probably isn’t enough funding.

How useful is the REF for students and potential students?

There is clearly a connection between research and teaching, so I’d like to think most academics who are teachers are also involved in research in some way. Not all of them will be involved in research of the quality which will get them submitted to the REF and there are many other factors which affect the quality of teaching and the experience students receive.

Some of the universities which are less-research intensive are the universities which are very focused on the quality of their education and the student experience. Just looking at the REF results is not hugely helpful to a potential applicant. It says something about the quality of research in that unit, or that university, but it doesn’t really tell you anything about the quality of education, the nature of the curriculum, the amount of teaching hours and contact hours that students have.

But at postgraduate level, particularly for postgraduate research students, I think that the stronger research units provide a very good quality research environment for them to succeed and thrive.

What are the key things to look out for in this year’s REF results?

One interesting thing to see will be to look out for the pockets of excellence from 2008 and see whether they have been maintained. The other would be how the subject assessment panels have assessed impact and how this has played into the overall assessment of each unit.

Is the way the UK assesses research different from other countries?

We were probably the pioneers of this type of exercise, way back in the mid 1980s. Undoubtedly, some of the countries whose higher education is modelled on the UK system, such as Australia and Hong Kong, have modelled their research systems on very similar lines. But then there are very successful research systems in countries such as the US, where there isn’t anything comparable with this and assessment and peer review happens at different levels.The Conversation


Rama Thirunamachandran is the academic lead and chief executive of Canterbury Christ Church University. He joined the University in October 2013, following five years as deputy vice-chancellor and provost of Keele University with overall responsibility for Keele’s academic activities. At Keele he was also responsible for its strategic and operational leadership for academic planning, budgeting, and delivery of teaching, research and enterprise, with specific responsibility for leading the University’s Internationalization Strategy. From 2002, Rama Thirunamachandran was director for research, innovation and skills at the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) with overall responsibility for the strategic direction of HEFCE’s research, knowledge transfer, and employer engagement and skills policies, with an annual budgetary responsibility of £1.5 billion. His responsibilities included oversight of the operation of the Research Assessment Exercise and the development of the Research Excellence Framework.

View all posts by Rama Thirunamachandran

Related Articles

Daniel Kahneman, 1934-2024: The Grandfather of Behavioral Economics
News
March 27, 2024

Daniel Kahneman, 1934-2024: The Grandfather of Behavioral Economics

Read Now
A Community Call: Spotlight on Women’s Safety in the Music Industry 
Insights
March 22, 2024

A Community Call: Spotlight on Women’s Safety in the Music Industry 

Read Now
2024 Holberg Prize Goes to Political Theorist Achille Mbembe
News
March 14, 2024

2024 Holberg Prize Goes to Political Theorist Achille Mbembe

Read Now
Charles V. Hamilton, 1929-2023: The Philosopher Behind ‘Black Power’
Career
March 5, 2024

Charles V. Hamilton, 1929-2023: The Philosopher Behind ‘Black Power’

Read Now
New Feminist Newsletter The Evidence Makes Research on Gender Inequality Widely Accessible

New Feminist Newsletter The Evidence Makes Research on Gender Inequality Widely Accessible

Gloria Media, with support from Sage, has launched The Evidence, a feminist newsletter that covers what you need to know about gender […]

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

The processes of mainstreaming and normalization of far-right politics have much to do with the mainstream itself, if not more than with the far right.

Read Now
Contemporary Politics Focus of March Webinar Series

Contemporary Politics Focus of March Webinar Series

This March, the Sage Politics team launches its first Politics Webinar Week. These webinars are free to access and will be delivered by contemporary politics experts —drawn from Sage’s team of authors and editors— who range from practitioners to instructors.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments