Communication

Is it something I said? Sense of humor and partner embarrassment

May 3, 2011 1275

The potentially harmful effects of humor in romantic relationships is explored in a recent study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Jeffrey A. Hall was exploring uncharted terrain in this study. ‘Taboo’ humor, in the context of romantic relationships, has not been studied previously, although the negative effects of ‘off-color’ jokes, along with the positive effects of humor in romantic relationships, has been.

Drawing on previous studies regarding embarrassment and sex differences in humor, Hall developed the following three hypotheses:

  • Understanding will have a positive association with embarrassment for women, and a negative association with embarrassment for men.
  • Men will self report, and women will perceive, that men use more negative humor.
  • Women will be more embarrassed by their partners’ use of humor than will men.

One hundred and six couples separately completed a survey which measured the partipants’ sense of humor, their evaluation of their partners’ sense of humor, and their embarrassment regarding their partners’ sense of humor.

Results suggested that men who perceive greater similarity with their partners’ aggressive style of humor had partners who were less embarrassed, and women who perceived greater similarity in aggressive humor were less likely to be embarrassed by their partners.

These results also inform our understanding of the relationship between embarrassment and humor. Feeling embarrassed by an inappropriate joke requires a different perception of what is socially acceptable, and about what is funny. Couples who feel that they have a similar sense of humor are less likely to be embarrassed by each other’s jokes, because possessing a similar sense of humor implies similar interpretations of the message and the context in which it is delivered (Billig, 2001).

Click here to read the study in its entirety.

Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, is a global academic publisher of books, journals, and library resources with a growing range of technologies to enable discovery, access, and engagement. Believing that research and education are critical in shaping society, 24-year-old Sara Miller McCune founded Sage in 1965. Today, we are controlled by a group of trustees charged with maintaining our independence and mission indefinitely. 

View all posts by Sage

Related Articles

Free Online Course Reveals The Art of ChatGPT Interactions
Resources
March 28, 2024

Free Online Course Reveals The Art of ChatGPT Interactions

Read Now
Apply for Sage’s 2024 Concept Grants
Announcements
March 7, 2024

Apply for Sage’s 2024 Concept Grants

Read Now
New Podcast Series Applies Social Science to Social Justice Issues
Impact
February 28, 2024

New Podcast Series Applies Social Science to Social Justice Issues

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?
Communication
February 27, 2024

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Read Now
The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

Retractions are generally framed as a negative: as science not working properly, as an embarrassment for the institutions involved, or as a flaw in the peer review process. They can be all those things. But they can also be part of a story of science working the right way: finding and correcting errors, and publicly acknowledging when information turns out to be incorrect.

Read Now
Safiya Noble on Search Engines

Safiya Noble on Search Engines

In an age where things like facial recognition or financial software algorithms are shown to uncannily reproduce the prejudices of their creators, this was much less obvious earlier in the century, when researchers like Safiya Umoja Noble were dissecting search engine results and revealing the sometimes appalling material they were highlighting.

Read Now
Did Turing Miss the Point? Should He Have Thought of the Limerick Test?

Did Turing Miss the Point? Should He Have Thought of the Limerick Test?

David Canter is horrified by the power of readily available large language technology.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments