Featured

New Opportunity to Support Government Evaluation of Public Participation and Community Engagement Now Open

April 22, 2024 533

Thanks to a new collaboration between the United States government’s Office of Management & Budget and the General Services Administration (GSA), a new opportunity to engage is federal evidence is now open for applications. The President’s Management Agenda Learning Agenda: Public Participation & Community Engagement Evidence Challenge is dedicated to forming a strategic, evidence-based plan that federal agencies and external researchers can use to solve big problems. This project is expected to create new and innovative tools for government evaluation of community engagement and public participation and develop an extensive toolkit of methods and metrics that will evaluate the effectiveness of public participation and community engagement (PPCE) initiatives.

All interested applicants, whether individuals or teams, will be responsible for developing a PPCE evaluation toolkit to address:

  1. What approaches increase awareness of PPCE opportunities among members of affected communities?
  2. How do motivators and barriers to PPCE vary across demographic factors and lived experiences? What features of PPCE activities serve to build on those motivators and/or mitigate barriers to participation?
  3. How does participation in PPCE opportunities affect perceptions of related Federal program or policy decisions and the leaders or agencies who make and implement them? and
  4. What measures, data sources, and analytic methods provide actionable information about the relative effectiveness of PPCE approaches in terms of their contributions to increasing reach, improving diversity and inclusivity, eliciting substantive involvement and nuanced input from participants, and promoting trust in Federal decision-making?

In Phase I, interested potential solvers will develop and submit a technical concept paper that will outline and detail the applicant’s approach in formulating their toolkit. This paper should provide a framework on the potential output and outcome measures, the sources and types of data agencies that will be used for PPCE evaluation, information on how the toolkit will aid Federal agencies, and other components in the toolkit. The best three technical concept papers will be selected, and each winner will receive $15,000 from the GSA to continue their PPCE evaluation toolkits in Phase II. All interested applicants should adhere to the following Phase I Timeline:

  • Challenge Phase I Opens: April 8, 2024
  • Phase I Submission Deadline: May 21, 2024
  • Judging Begins: May 22, 2024
  • Judging Ends: May 31, 2024
  • Notify Phase I Winners: June 3, 2024

In Phase II, the remaining three potential solvers will submit their PPCE evaluation toolkits. These toolkits will be evaluated using the following metrics:

  1. Guidance for evaluation planning (e.g., actionable and practicable approaches for embedding evaluation in the roll-out of new PPCE approaches, including related communications and outreach),
  2. Identification of valid output and outcome measures (relevant indicators may include measures of: participant diversity, breadth and saturation of reach, new or unique perspectives gained, engagement quality, engagement satisfaction, and measures of trust in government), and
  3. Strategies to collect and analyze data to contribute to a shared and growing evidence base that can inform continual improvement and refinement of approaches to effective and equitable PPCE across the government.

In addition to these detailed toolkits, each submission should also include a sample case study that demonstrates the applicability to the proposed toolkit. The winner of Phase II will receive $150,000 from the GSA and may have the opportunity to work alongside a federal agency to implement their evaluation toolkit in a PPCE activity undertaken by the agency. The three potential problem solvers remaining in Phase II should adhere to the following timeline:

  • Challenge Phase II Opens: June 3, 2024
  • Phase II Submission Deadline: August 2, 2024
  • Judging Begins: August 5, 2024
  • Judging Ends: August 16, 2024
  • Notify Phase II Winner: August 19, 2024

All interested applicants should visit this website for more information. For other challenges and competitions to support the public good, please visit the Challenge.gov for an entire database of open opportunities.

Christopher Everett is the social sciences communications intern at Sage. He is currently studying public policy and media and journalism at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. With a strong passion for the interplay of law, policy, and communications, Christopher seeks to bridge the gap between these fields through insightful communication and analysis.

View all posts by Christopher Everett

Related Articles

Exploring ‘Lost Person Behavior’ and the Science of Search and Rescue
Featured
April 24, 2024

Exploring ‘Lost Person Behavior’ and the Science of Search and Rescue

Read Now
Three Decades of Rural Health Research and a Bumper Crop of Insights from South Africa
Impact
March 27, 2024

Three Decades of Rural Health Research and a Bumper Crop of Insights from South Africa

Read Now
Using Translational Research as a Model for Long-Term Impact
Impact
March 21, 2024

Using Translational Research as a Model for Long-Term Impact

Read Now
Coping with Institutional Complexity and Voids: An Organization Design Perspective for Transnational Interorganizational Projects
Research
March 19, 2024

Coping with Institutional Complexity and Voids: An Organization Design Perspective for Transnational Interorganizational Projects

Read Now
The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting

The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting

Based on a study of how research is cited in national and local media sources, Andy Tattersall shows how research is often poorly represented in the media and suggests better community standards around linking to original research could improve trust in mainstream media.

Read Now
Revolutionizing Management Research with Immersive Research Methods

Revolutionizing Management Research with Immersive Research Methods

In this article, Anand van Zelderen, Nicky Dries, and Elise Marescaux reflect on their decision to explore nontraditional research.

Read Now
A Behavioral Scientist’s Take on the Dangers of Self-Censorship in Science

A Behavioral Scientist’s Take on the Dangers of Self-Censorship in Science

The word censorship might bring to mind authoritarian regimes, book-banning, and restrictions on a free press, but Cory Clark, a behavioral scientist at […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments