Industry

NSF Announces Program to Enhance Research at Minority-Serving Institutions

December 21, 2022 2548

The National Science Foundation has announced a Build and Broaden program to support research and research capacity at minority-serving institutions (MSI) specifically in the social, behavioral and economic sciences.

As NSF explains, “Targeted outreach activities reveal that MSIs have varying degrees of familiarity with funding opportunities within NSF and particularly within the Social, Behavioral and Economic (SBE) Sciences Directorate. As a result, NSF is limited in its ability to support research and training opportunities in the SBE sciences at these institutions. With its emphasis on broadening participation, Build and Broaden is designed to address this problem.” This initiative seeks to redress varying degrees of familiarity with NSF funding opportunities among those at MSIs, which results in few grant submissions.

This latest initiative in the Build and Broaden program, which was launched in early 2020, will award 25 to 30 proposals depending on funding availability and proposal quality, and the total anticipated funding amount is $8 million. NAS explains that proposals may address any scientific and cross-disciplinary areas supported by SBE. These areas include anthropology, archaeology, cognitive neuroscience, decision science, ecological research, economics, geography, linguistics, law and science, organizational behavior, political science, public policy, security and preparedness, psychology, and sociology. 

Proposals will be reviewed through an ad hoc review, panel review or an internal NSF review based on intellectual quality, potential to increase research capacity at participating MSI(s), impacts on professional development of faculty and students at the participating MSI(s) and the nature of the partnership if there is more than one principal investigator.

The full proposal target date is Jan. 19, 2023.

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

Advocating For and Supporting Academic Freedom
Ethics
May 28, 2025

Advocating For and Supporting Academic Freedom

Read Now
Academic Freedom and Censorship: Why Librarians are Better Together
Ethics
May 27, 2025

Academic Freedom and Censorship: Why Librarians are Better Together

Read Now
The Chilling Impact of Censorship in Higher Education
Ethics
May 26, 2025

The Chilling Impact of Censorship in Higher Education

Read Now
Mapping the Connections: Understanding the Network of Social Science Editors-in-Chief 
Communication
April 29, 2025

Mapping the Connections: Understanding the Network of Social Science Editors-in-Chief 

Read Now
How Science Can Adapt to a New Normal

How Science Can Adapt to a New Normal

Scientific institutions are in full scramble. No amount of diplomacy or charity can interpret the modern moment as anything other than an […]

Read Now
Those ‘Indirect Costs’ Targeted by DOGE Directly Support America’s Research Excellence

Those ‘Indirect Costs’ Targeted by DOGE Directly Support America’s Research Excellence

Biomedical research in the U.S. is world-class in part because of a long-standing partnership between universities and the federal government. On Feb. […]

Read Now
AI is Here, But Is It Here to Help Us or Replace Us?

AI is Here, But Is It Here to Help Us or Replace Us?

Decisions taken now around how generative AI is used by academics and universities will shape the future of research. Mark Carrigan argues whilst optimistic scenarios are possible, generative AI stands ready to feed into an existing productivity oriented framing of academic work.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments