Why We Have Launched Social Science Space

February 1, 2011

Ziyad Marar, global publishing director, SAGE

Ziyad Marar, global publishing director, SAGE

Over the last year SAGE has devoted time and energy to celebrating the social sciences. We have done so by convening a series of workshops, author panels, conferences and public lectures around the world. Whether in California, Delhi, Beijing, London or Washington, D.C. to name a few locations we have heard inspiring and passionate arguments for the importance of social science to healthy societies.

And yet, despite the power of these arguments, their ‘impact’, for want of a better word, has been diffuse. In the UK we start this year in the knowledge of an astonishing fact: in future not a single penny of state funding will go to support any student studying for an undergraduate degree in the social sciences (or in the arts and humanities for that matter).

Part of the problem comes from the wide-ranging nature of the arguments presented. Social science ranges in subject matter from evolutionary psychology to international relations, from criminology to economics. And the sources of value thereby created by these disciplines are equally diverse.

Whether discussing similarities with science, or the humanities, whether evidenced-based policy or knowledge for its own sake, social science faces the ‘wicked problem’ of justifying itself.

Here are five of the arguments we have been repeatedly hearing over the past year, some of which were also presented at the recent House of Lords launch of the AcSS’s Campaign for Social Science and at which we announced Social Science Space:

1. Social science is engaged with key government priorities such as:  wellbeing; life chances, talent and social mobility; the ageing and increasing diversity of the population; family life and communities; crime and public safety, terrorism and extremism to name a few. As The Guardian journalist Polly Toynbee argued at the event, these priorities require government policies that are clearly grounded in the evidence provided by social science.

2. Social science contributes to empirical and theoretical knowledge in its own right; making discoveries and creating concepts that increase the store of knowledge about everything from the human mind to social norms to globalization. As the renowned sociologist Lord Anthony Giddens said in his speech at the House of Lords ‘most people in politics and the media do not know where they get their ideas from’.

3. Social science makes a major contribution to the economy. Aside from the range of subjects dedicated to improving business competitiveness (from understanding consumer behaviour through to leadership and management skills); employers are crying out for the well rounded individual with strong communication and research skills that is the natural product of a social science degree.   And let’s not forget that the vast majority of the Cabinet are beneficiaries of social science degrees.

4. Natural scientists are arguing for the importance of social science in delivering behaviour change necessitated by the science itself – Climatologists for example routinely argue for the need to shift our focus from the science (which is relatively settled) to the social science problem of changing behaviour in order to tackle global warming. At the launch event David Willetts talked of the difficulty medical researchers face in getting vaccines adopted in societies that are suspicious of Western medicine. They are calling for help from social anthropologists to address the problem.

5. Social science, like the humanities, contributes crucially to the development of a healthy democracy. Martha Nussbaum’s argument for the value of the humanities in her recent book Not for Profit makes eloquent arguments that are true of the social sciences too. They provide those who study these fields with skills of argumentation and critical thinking that are necessary to evaluating information and imagining others’ perspectives. These skills provide a bulwark against the uncritical consumption of propaganda or a prejudicial world view that leads to discrimination and oppression.

The range of ways that social science can be valued is its weakness as much as its strength. Whether discussing similarities with science, or the humanities, whether evidenced-based policy or knowledge for its own sake, social science faces the ‘wicked problem’ of justifying itself. The value of social science is as complex as the subject matter with which it engages; offering long term and short term benefits that are both qualitative and quantitative in nature. Too much for the easy tabloid headline which our culture so often demands.  In addition the voices, ranging across disciplines and geography, often talk past each other.

We who believe passionately in the value of the social science face what economists call a coordination problem. We need a focal point. In this context we have launched Social Science Space to meet that need. In our position as a global publisher of social science with a network of thousands of authors and hundreds of learned societies we feel a responsibility to acknowledge the debt we owe the disciplines we have published over the decades and are well suited to convene these discussions, and to provide that much needed focal point.

The forum is not just about advocacy. Not just about funding, impact and public policy. We will provide a central place in which we can see and debate social science in action. Whether identifying new paradigms, interdisciplinary connections or the challenges of rigorous research methodology, we will showcase the value and rich diversity of the community as a whole.

Our hope is that through Social Science Space academics from across the world and diverse disciplines will create discussion and debate alongside people from media and government through this forum. We encourage the widest kind of participation, and are already thrilled to see the levels of interest and enthusiasm indicated by the numbers of registrants and society partners who have already participated. We invite you to explore the website and to join the debate.

Ziyad Marar is global publishing director and deputy managing director of SAGE.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Ziyad Marar is an author and president of global publishing at SAGE Publishing. His books include Judged: The Value of Being Misunderstood (Bloomsbury, 2018), Intimacy: Understanding the Subtle Power of Human Connection (Acumen Publishing, 2012), Deception (Acumen Publishing, 2008), and The Happiness Paradox (Reaktion Books 2003). He tweets @ZiyadMarar.

View all posts by Ziyad Marar

Related Articles

The Silver Lining in Bulk Retractions
November 20, 2023

The Silver Lining in Bulk Retractions

Read Now
Fake News, Misinformation Focus of New Microsite
October 30, 2023

Fake News, Misinformation Focus of New Microsite

Read Now
From Rejections to Reflections: Unveiling the Role of Horizontal Linkages in Academia
Business and Management INK
September 26, 2023

From Rejections to Reflections: Unveiling the Role of Horizontal Linkages in Academia

Read Now
Nomination Window Closing For 2024 Alan T. Waterman Award
September 13, 2023

Nomination Window Closing For 2024 Alan T. Waterman Award

Read Now
Efforts To Protect Endangered Minority Languages: Helpful Or Harmful?

Efforts To Protect Endangered Minority Languages: Helpful Or Harmful?

Headlines abound with the plight of endangered minority languages around the world. Read a few of these and you’ll see some common themes: the rising number of languages dying worldwide, the distressing isolation of individual last speakers and the wider cultural loss for humanity.

Read Now
Book Review: A Memoir Highlighting Scientific Complexity

Book Review: A Memoir Highlighting Scientific Complexity

In this brief, crisply written memoir, “In a Flight of Starlings: The Wonders of Complex Systems,” Parisi takes the reader on a journey through his scientific life in the realm of complex, disordered systems, from fundamental particles to migratory birds. He argues that science’s struggle to understand and master the universe’s complexity, and especially to communicate it to an ever-more skeptical public, holds the key to humanity’s future well-being.

Read Now
Kohrra on Netflix – Policing and Everyday Life in Contemporary India

Kohrra on Netflix – Policing and Everyday Life in Contemporary India

Even Social Science Space bloggers occasionally have downtime when they log in to Netflix and crash out. One of my favourite themes […]

Read Now
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yaron Rosenstein

Sorry, but all I see are declarative statesments.
You claim social science generates empirical results, where is the evidence ?
Social science can not be considered science unless it adopts the null hypothesis.
Until then it is just quackery.


This is an excellent initiative. As a social scientist (as well as a trainer and researcher in smallholder livestock-crop dynamics) I find that the use of my soc. sci. skills often are often brought into the mix ‘incognito’. This is not the case with my biological (etc) sci. skills


how do I change my password to something intelligible?


Hello James, if you check your email we’ve sent you a note which should help. Thanks!


Nic, I can’t even find the “contact us”. I wanted to “contact us” because I’ve reveived spam in my mailbox here (the following): glory sent you a new message: Subject: “Hello , How are you today ? . I hope you are fine and all is well with you, My name is miss glory i saw your profile at which really interest me and i decide to communicate with you, and it will please me if you will be my friend, write me with my email at ( so that i will give you my picture and tell… Read more »


Hello Linda,
We’re very sorry to hear you’ve received spam on your socialsciencespace account. We have now removed the user from our system. We appreciate your flagging this to us and hope that you will continue to find socialsciencespace a useful site to visit.
Kind regards, Mithu Lucraft, SAGE

Harold QIN

It’s a very surprising comment. Social Sciences are playing a little awkward roles. In China, scholars discussed the problems in the 1930s formally, but unfortunately without agreed conclusion. China has a long history of conventinal Humanity during that time, some scholars believed it is NOT proper for the science invading into the troditional area ocupied by conventional ethics.

Henry Zakumumpa

From a Ugandan perspective, the value of the social sciences is not contested and much taken for granted. I know though that in my university feel the social sciences are the ‘inferior’ sciences. Its is interesting to learn that the value of social sciences in the west are currently under intense debate.


hi, I am sorry but it’s no wonder the politicians don’t take you seriously… I mean, for one thing, your point #2 and point #3 contradict. If, as your quote suggests, Giddens is right in saying ‘‘most people in politics and the media do not know where they get their ideas from”, then how is it possible that the social sciences have any value, if also ‘the vast majority of the Cabinet are beneficiaries of social science degrees’…. You’ve just shown you’re your own worst enemy. Who needs politicians to tell you us that we don’t need social scientists, if… Read more »

Naum Aloyo

I have to agree with you. I have a problem now with some members of economic department at the university where i am registered for PhD: they can’t see any economics in the study of urban forestry when there is a lot. They think urban forestry should best be left to geography and ecology? They further don’t see how climate change mitigation is related to economics? Please

Geston moyo

Thanks for inviting me to join the debate

Aidan Foster-Carter

Many thanks for this valuable initiative!

Aidan Foster-Carter
Honorary Senior Research Fellow in Sociology & Modern Korea, Leeds University, UK


sorry for using this entry to post a comment, but I wanted to let you know, that on my mac clicking to email you via ‘contact us’ does not work.
SUGGESTION: would it be possible, that you could post somewhere easy to find your email-address please?

2nd issue:
one event entry has the wrong year, its on your site stated as 2011, but it is in 2012!
10th Conference of the World Association for Person Centred and Experiential Psychotherapy and Counseling

Best wishes,



Hi Nic,
Thanks to alerting us to these two issues: both pages have now been updated. To get in contact with us please email info[at] or alternatively contact site editor Catriona Moore on catriona.moore[at]