Academic Funding

When did the Big Society turn into Big Brother?

March 29, 2011 1806

A column by Tom Sutcliffe in today’s Independent addresses the question of academic freedom posed by reports that the Arts and Humanities Research Council will require academics seeking research funds to study the Big Society as a priority.

The AHRC denies that it has been subject to government pressure, and insists that it remains independent. But academics are concerned about the control of research and the perceived threat to intellectual freedom. Tom Sutcliffe suggests it’s the next step on from impact statements, which he describes as “a witless and time-wasting obligation introduced by a Labour government”.

What’s your view: is academic freedom really under threat here? Will pressure (whether explicit or implicit) to study a government priority distort the research agenda? And does anyone want to study the Big Society?

Related Articles

Outstanding Social and Behavioral Scientists Sought for Sage-CASBS Award
Recognition
October 20, 2025

Outstanding Social and Behavioral Scientists Sought for Sage-CASBS Award

Read Now
Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?
Infrastructure
October 20, 2025

Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?

Read Now
Share Your Most Surprising Policy Citation for Chance to Win $500 
Announcements
October 17, 2025

Share Your Most Surprising Policy Citation for Chance to Win $500 

Read Now
We See Economic Growth Differently Thanks to the 2025 Nobelists in Economics
Impact
October 14, 2025

We See Economic Growth Differently Thanks to the 2025 Nobelists in Economics

Read Now
Popular Paper Examines Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Analysis

Popular Paper Examines Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Analysis

“Trust, but verify,” is a Russian proverb that gained prominence during the Cold War during negotiations centered on nuclear arsenals. That idea […]

Read Now
Examining How Open Research Affects Vulnerable Participants

Examining How Open Research Affects Vulnerable Participants

Open research has become a buzzword in university research, but Jo Hemlatha and Thomas Graves argue that when it comes to qualitative research, considerations around replicability, context-dependent methods and the sensitivity of data from marginalized people mean that openness takes many different forms.

Read Now
Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment

Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment

Look closely at your mobile phone or tablet. Touch-screen technology, speech recognition, digital sound recording and the internet were all developed using […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments