Featured

Neoclassical economists don’t understand neoclassical economics

August 15, 2011 9058

This post was originally published on Steve Keen’s Debtwatch.

That transcendental truth occurred to me while writing the second edition of Debunking Economics–which will be published in September. In this video, I point out the most egregious instance of this, the “Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu” (SMD) conditions. This refers to research by leading neoclassical economists on whether the so-called “Law of Demand” that can be proven for an individual’s demand curve applies to a market demand curve.

The “Law of Demand” is the proposition that, if a commodity’s price falls, the demand for it will rise. That sounds like a reasonable statement at first glance–and it will often be true in the real world. But it is an article of faith for economists that this is always true.

Ironically, neoclassical economists proved that this is in general not true. Even when you are working with individuals who all individually have what economists call “well behaved” preferences, and for whom individual demand curves can be derived that obey the “Law of Demand”, the market demand derived by summing these individual demands can have any shape at all.

If neoclassical economists took this neoclassical result seriously, then they would not draw “downward sloping market demand curves” in microeconomics–they would instead draw squiggly lines–and they wouldn’t use equilibrium “supply and demand” analysis. But not only do they do that, they also model the entire economy as a single individual in what they call “Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium” models.

These absurd models were what led to them believing that the economy was in great shape, just before it collapsed into the Great Recession.

I cover this issue at great length in Debunking Economics II. In this video presentation, I give an overview of the SMD conditions. At one point, you’ll hear me take a straw poll of how many people in the room knew of these conditions: only two did out of about 60. This was a brilliant illustration of my basic point, that neoclassical economists don’t understand their own theory.

Click here for the Powerpoint slides.

Steve Keen is Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Western Sydney, and author of ‘Debunking economics’.

Related Articles

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal
Artificial Intelligence
March 10, 2026

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Read Now
Thinking Qualitatively: Making a Difference
Event
March 10, 2026

Thinking Qualitatively: Making a Difference

Read Now
Measuring What Matters: Why Academic Pathways Need Shared Evidence, Not Just Good Intentions 
Infrastructure
February 17, 2026

Measuring What Matters: Why Academic Pathways Need Shared Evidence, Not Just Good Intentions 

Read Now
Andrea Medina-Smith on Making Research Data More FAIR
Industry
February 9, 2026

Andrea Medina-Smith on Making Research Data More FAIR

Read Now
After the University? Braiding a Path Forward

After the University? Braiding a Path Forward

Around the world, universities are in crisis. Some argue that we’re witnessing the slow collapse of the system as we’ve known it—whether […]

Read Now
What Is a University For, After Gaza?

What Is a University For, After Gaza?

What is a university for? Traditionally, education has long been seen as a foundation for ethical and intellectual life. Aristotle viewed learning […]

Read Now
An AI Authorship Protocol Aims to Sharpen a Sometimes-Fuzzy Line

An AI Authorship Protocol Aims to Sharpen a Sometimes-Fuzzy Line

The latest generation of artificial intelligence models is sharper and smoother, producing polished text with fewer errors and hallucinations. As a philosophy […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments