Impact

Stories of Research to Reality: Deborah Rupp Impact
Deborah Rupp

Stories of Research to Reality: Deborah Rupp

May 21, 2015 3474

Deborah Rupp

Deborah Rupp

In early May SAGE gathered seven social scientists on Capitol Hill to tell stories, stories of their discipline’s impact on society and the economy, and stories of their own academic journey. The underlying goal of “Stories of Research to Reality: How the Social Sciences Change the World” was both to mark SAGE’s 50th birthday as an independent publisher and to demonstrate the value and impact of social science itself, increasingly under attack as either a waste or a luxury by some legislators.

The entire event, moderated by prominent blogger and George Washington University political scientist John Sides and held at the Hart Senate Office Building, was recorded; the seven individual videos are being published here over the next seven weeks. Each tale presents one facet of the real-world value of actual social and behavioral science research, with the implicit message that this is scholarship we should be encouraging.

The first speaker in this series is Deborah E. Rupp, a management professor at Purdue University and the William C. Byham Chair in Industrial/Organizational Psychology.

She conducts research on organizational justice, behavioral ethics, corporate social responsibility, and humanitarian work psychology; as well as issues surrounding behavioral assessment, technology, bias, and the law. Her research has been cited in U.S. Supreme Court proceedings, and she has worked with organizations around the world such as UNICEF, the Emirates Group, and the South Korean government. Rupp has published three books and more than 80 papers and chapters, and is the outgoing editor-in-chief of Journal of Management, the top-ranked empirical journal in business, management, and applied psychology.

In her talk, Rupp describes some of the specific areas she’s taken her discipline — industrial organization psychology, which is the scientific study of human behavior in the workplace – such as exploring aging in the workplace, recruiting and training returning veterans for civilian fields, and the psychological impact of being unemployed. She then zeroes in on her current research, studying unfairness (or the perception of unfairness) on the job.

Employees who believe their job is just are happier, healthier and more productive, while those who field aggrieved are sicker, less productive and prone to introduce unwanted behaviors from theft to litigiousness. “People,” she explains, “expect other people to treat each other fairly – just because.”

 

 

Upcoming speakers in this series include:

Bruce Bueno De Mesquita | Julius Silver Professor of Politics, New York University

Claire M. Renzetti | professor of sociology, University of Kentucky

John W. Creswell | professor of educational psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Michael Reisch | Daniel Thursz Distinguished Professor of Social Justice, University of Maryland

Jim Knight |research associate, University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning, and director of the Kansas Coaching Project

Kerric Harvey | associate professor of media and public affairs, and associate director of the Center for Innovative Media, George Washington University

SAGE is the parent of Social Science Space.


Related Articles

How Research Credibility Suffers in a Quantified Society
Higher Education Reform
January 8, 2025

How Research Credibility Suffers in a Quantified Society

Read Now
Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of  Academic Metrics
Infrastructure
December 18, 2024

Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of Academic Metrics

Read Now
Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 
Impact
November 5, 2024

Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate

Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate

Sage 1449 Impact

Psychologists Jonathan St. B. T. Evans and Keith E. Stanovich have a history of publishing important research papers that resonate for years.

Read Now
Webinar: Fundamentals of Research Impact

Webinar: Fundamentals of Research Impact

Sage 1189 Event, Impact

Whether you’re in a research leadership position, working in research development, or a researcher embarking on their project, creating a culture of […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments