Industry

NAS Announces Committee Studying Misinformation on Science

November 17, 2022 2234

The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine’ Board on Science Education announced a committee for a new consensus study focused on understanding and addressing misinformation about science. The study aims to “will identify solutions to limit its spread and provide guidance on interventions, policies, and research toward reducing harms caused from misinformation.”

NAS logo

The study received over 350 nominations, and ultimately named 14 experts to serve on the committee.  The committee will be chaired by Kasisomayajula “Vish” Viswanath of the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, and will feature members from Vanderbilt University, University of Essex, Rutgers University, Northeastern University and University of California, Davis, among others.

The committee will define disinformation and disinformation about science, assess its scope and characteristics, develop a holistic framework to understand the influences and impacts of misinformation through various case studies, examine existing mitigation efforts and identify ethical considerations for future efforts, and identify priorities for future research.

In addition to Viswanath, members of the committee are: Nick Allum, professor of research methodology at the University of Essex; Nadine J. Barrett, a medical sociologist and assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at Duke University; David Broniatowski, associate professor of engineering management and systems engineering in George Washington University’s School of Engineering and Applied Science, and the associate director of GW’s Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics; Afua N. Bruce, a public interest technologist who has spent her career working at the intersection of technology, policy, and society; Lisa Fazio, associate professor of psychology at Vanderbilt University; Lauren Feldman, associate professor in the School of Communication & Information at Rutgers University; Deen Freelon, associate professor at the UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media at the University of North Carolina and a principal researcher at the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life; Asheley Landrum, associate professor and interim assistant dean for research in the College of Media & Communication at Texas Tech University; David Lazer, University Distinguished Professor of Political Science and Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, and Visiting Fellow at the Institute for Quantitative Social Science at Harvard University; Pamela C. Ronald, professor in the Genome Center and the Department of Plant Pathology, and founding director of the Institute for Food and Agricultural Literacy, at the University of California, Davis; David Scales, an internal medicine hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine and Chief Medical Officer at Critica, an NGO focused on building scientific literacy; Brian Southwell, senior director at RTI International; and Jevin West, associate professor in the Information School at the University of Washington and co-founder of the Center for an Informed Public.

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change
Bookshelf
March 29, 2024

Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Makes an Outsized Impact on Policy
Industry
March 4, 2024

Why Social Science? Because It Makes an Outsized Impact on Policy

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?
Communication
February 27, 2024

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Read Now
The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting
Impact
February 26, 2024

The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting

Read Now
A Behavioral Scientist’s Take on the Dangers of Self-Censorship in Science

A Behavioral Scientist’s Take on the Dangers of Self-Censorship in Science

The word censorship might bring to mind authoritarian regimes, book-banning, and restrictions on a free press, but Cory Clark, a behavioral scientist at […]

Read Now
SSRC Links with U.S. Treasury on Evaluation Projects

SSRC Links with U.S. Treasury on Evaluation Projects

Thanks to a partnership between the SSRC and the US Department of the Treasury, two new research opportunities in program evaluation – the Homeowner Assistance Fund Project and the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Project – have opened.

Read Now
The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

Retractions are generally framed as a negative: as science not working properly, as an embarrassment for the institutions involved, or as a flaw in the peer review process. They can be all those things. But they can also be part of a story of science working the right way: finding and correcting errors, and publicly acknowledging when information turns out to be incorrect.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments