Industry

NAS Announces Committee Studying Misinformation on Science

November 17, 2022 2303

The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine’ Board on Science Education announced a committee for a new consensus study focused on understanding and addressing misinformation about science. The study aims to “will identify solutions to limit its spread and provide guidance on interventions, policies, and research toward reducing harms caused from misinformation.”

NAS logo

The study received over 350 nominations, and ultimately named 14 experts to serve on the committee.  The committee will be chaired by Kasisomayajula “Vish” Viswanath of the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, and will feature members from Vanderbilt University, University of Essex, Rutgers University, Northeastern University and University of California, Davis, among others.

The committee will define disinformation and disinformation about science, assess its scope and characteristics, develop a holistic framework to understand the influences and impacts of misinformation through various case studies, examine existing mitigation efforts and identify ethical considerations for future efforts, and identify priorities for future research.

In addition to Viswanath, members of the committee are: Nick Allum, professor of research methodology at the University of Essex; Nadine J. Barrett, a medical sociologist and assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at Duke University; David Broniatowski, associate professor of engineering management and systems engineering in George Washington University’s School of Engineering and Applied Science, and the associate director of GW’s Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics; Afua N. Bruce, a public interest technologist who has spent her career working at the intersection of technology, policy, and society; Lisa Fazio, associate professor of psychology at Vanderbilt University; Lauren Feldman, associate professor in the School of Communication & Information at Rutgers University; Deen Freelon, associate professor at the UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media at the University of North Carolina and a principal researcher at the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life; Asheley Landrum, associate professor and interim assistant dean for research in the College of Media & Communication at Texas Tech University; David Lazer, University Distinguished Professor of Political Science and Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, and Visiting Fellow at the Institute for Quantitative Social Science at Harvard University; Pamela C. Ronald, professor in the Genome Center and the Department of Plant Pathology, and founding director of the Institute for Food and Agricultural Literacy, at the University of California, Davis; David Scales, an internal medicine hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine and Chief Medical Officer at Critica, an NGO focused on building scientific literacy; Brian Southwell, senior director at RTI International; and Jevin West, associate professor in the Information School at the University of Washington and co-founder of the Center for an Informed Public.

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment
Insights
June 14, 2024

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

Read Now
How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves
Ethics
June 4, 2024

How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves

Read Now
Fourth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Do Women Make Better Doctors? 
Communication
May 30, 2024

Fourth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Do Women Make Better Doctors? 

Read Now
Opportunity to Participate in RFI on Proposed National Secure Data Service
Announcements
May 28, 2024

Opportunity to Participate in RFI on Proposed National Secure Data Service

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Social sciences can also inform the design and creation of ethical frameworks and guidelines for AI development and for deployment into systems. Social scientists can contribute expertise: on data quality, equity, and reliability; on how bias manifests in AI algorithms and decision-making processes; on how AI technologies impact marginalized communities and exacerbate existing inequities; and on topics such as fairness, transparency, privacy, and accountability.

Read Now
Webinar – Trust in Science: Understanding the Trends and Implications for Science Communication

Webinar – Trust in Science: Understanding the Trends and Implications for Science Communication

Recent survey data show declines in trust in science that mirror earlier trends for other institutions, including journalism and government. New research […]

Read Now
Biden Administration Releases ‘Blueprint’ For Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Biden Administration Releases ‘Blueprint’ For Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

U.S. President Joseph Biden’s administration has laid down a marker buttressing the use of social and behavioral science in crafting policies for the federal government by releasing a 102-page Blueprint for the Use of Social and Behavioral Science to Advance Evidence-Based Policymaking.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments