Industry

Watch the Video: Improving Academic-Government Collaboration in Evidence-Based Policymaking

December 5, 2022 2930

“We’ve seen trust fail in many ways, especially across sectors,” said political scientist Jake Bowers in a recent online event, hosted by the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS) at Stanford University, addressing government-academic collaboration in evidence-based policy-making. “How do you overcome it? I think institutions help… train people on both sides how not to begin relationships with these possible negative starts and how to name and talk about incentives.” Bowers discussed how to overcome trust issues and stereotypes which hamper relationships between stakeholders.

The discussion on November 10, part of CASBS’ ongoing series Social Science for a World in Crisis, centered on the increase in evidence-based policymaking in the past few decades and how to overcome the practical, methodological, and economic barriers which remain. The event featured a live online panel discussion featuring speakers Bowers; Carrie Cihak, evidence and impact officer for the government of King County, Washington; political scientist Daniel Hopkins; and Piyush Tantia, chief innovation officer for Ideas42. Ruth Levine, the CEO of IDinsight, moderated the discussion.

Cihak spoke to the goal of increasing collaboration between academics and government officials.

“What we try to do is create forums within government where we can explore what researchers are learning and what’s emerging as they’re learning so we’re co-learning together,” she said. “That’s really helpful to researchers because we’re bringing our knowledge about the context to bear on the kinds of things that they’re looking at.”

To view other installments in the Social Science in a World in Crisis series, click here.

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

An AI Authorship Protocol Aims to Sharpen a Sometimes-Fuzzy Line
Artificial Intelligence
December 10, 2025

An AI Authorship Protocol Aims to Sharpen a Sometimes-Fuzzy Line

Read Now
AI Gaming of Some Online Courses Threatens Their Credibility
Innovation
November 18, 2025

AI Gaming of Some Online Courses Threatens Their Credibility

Read Now
New Guide Recognizes the Value of Good Curation
Bookshelf
October 29, 2025

New Guide Recognizes the Value of Good Curation

Read Now
It’s Silly to Expect AI Will Be Shorn of Human Bias
Innovation
September 16, 2025

It’s Silly to Expect AI Will Be Shorn of Human Bias

Read Now
What You Can Do As Data U.S. Taxpayers Paid For and Use Disappears

What You Can Do As Data U.S. Taxpayers Paid For and Use Disappears

People rely on data from federal agencies every day – often without realizing it. Rural residents use groundwater level data from the […]

Read Now
A Psychologist Explains Replication (and Why It’s Not the Same as Reproducibility)

A Psychologist Explains Replication (and Why It’s Not the Same as Reproducibility)

Back in high school chemistry, I remember waiting with my bench partner for crystals to form on our stick in the cup […]

Read Now
Examining How Open Research Affects Vulnerable Participants

Examining How Open Research Affects Vulnerable Participants

Open research has become a buzzword in university research, but Jo Hemlatha and Thomas Graves argue that when it comes to qualitative research, considerations around replicability, context-dependent methods and the sensitivity of data from marginalized people mean that openness takes many different forms.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments