Communication

Mapping the Connections: Understanding the Network of Social Science Editors-in-Chief 

April 29, 2025 5088

A new study on the connections between editors-in-chief in the social sciences reveals significant geographical and gender imbalances in editorial leadership. Male editors are more likely to occupy top positions at journals, while two countries – the U.S. and the U.K. – play a central role in shaping social sciences fields. 

The study, conducted by Manuel Goyanes, Luis de-Marcos, Timilehin Durotoye, Triwik Kurniasari, and Homero Gil de Zúñiga and appearing in PLOS One, examines the projected relationships between 4,868 editors-in-chief from 3,320 Journal Citation Reports-ranked journals, investigating how shared institutional and national backgrounds underpin this network of connections.  

The findings reveal how editorships can identify key fields, including economics, political science, and education, that connect a broad range of institutions in ways that might otherwise not be obvious. Top U.S. and U.K. universities have substantial editorial presences in these areas, giving them greater reach and influence within the social sciences publishing network.  

The study also highlights a lack of female representation on editorial boards, with nearly all research areas being dominated by male editors-in-chief. Notably, male editors outnumber their female counterparts across fields (66.67 percent), countries (76.60 percent), and institutional affiliations (63.16 percent).  

What’s the impact – and what can we do about it? 

Editors-in-chief, the paper argues, play a critical role in “shaping and disseminating scientific knowledge” (page 15 of the PDF version). Consequently, the geographical and gender-based disparities of editorial boards may have profound effects on the future of research. 

The centrality of U.S. and U.K. institutions suggests an editorial concentration that could potentially, the researchers suggest, “influence the decision-making process of scientific publishing in almost all fields” (19). This geographical dominance risks “a significant shortfall in the recognition of empirical knowledge” (19) from other countries.  

Similarly, the over-representation of male editors-in-chief “might affect the diversity of research perspectives and the overall direction of scholarship” (10), perhaps narrowing research scope and continuing “a skewed perspective in various disciplines” (20).   

A graphic from the paper “Editors-in-chief in social sciences: Mapping the institutional, geographical, and gender representation between academic fields” is a bipartite graph of fields and countries, illustrating the connections between fields and the countries of affiliation of their editors-in-chief. Node size is proportional to the number of editors. Line thickness is proportional to the number of editors-in-chief in that field affiliated with institutions in the connecting country.  

Revealing the dominance of male editors from the U.S. and U.K., these findings demonstrate “the need to create an even balance in editorial leadership” (16). The study indicates that promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within editorial roles could help foster “a more balanced and representative scholarly community” (20).  

How can we get there? The researchers offer the following suggestion: 

“One of the recommendations arising from our findings as a strategy to address male predominance in the global academic environment is the need to dissipate the monopoly of male EiCs in top Western countries, facilitate further decentralization of editorial authority across less dominant nations, and support a significant increase in the inclusion of female researchers/scientists in journal editorial boards as well as in the byline of publications.” (20-21). 

Read the full open-access article for further insights on creating more representative leadership in social science. 

Joe Sweeney is a corporate communications at Sage. Prior to working for Sage he earned a master’s degree in English literature, with a focus on photography, architecture, and fiction writing from 1900—present.

View all posts by Joe Sweeney

Related Articles

When Clarity Isn’t Enough: Rethinking AI’s Role in Cognitive Accessibility for Expert Domains
Industry
June 30, 2025

When Clarity Isn’t Enough: Rethinking AI’s Role in Cognitive Accessibility for Expert Domains

Read Now
The Ripple Effect of Book Bans on the Academy
Ethics
June 10, 2025

The Ripple Effect of Book Bans on the Academy

Read Now
Advocating For and Supporting Academic Freedom
Ethics
May 28, 2025

Advocating For and Supporting Academic Freedom

Read Now
Academic Freedom and Censorship: Why Librarians are Better Together
Ethics
May 27, 2025

Academic Freedom and Censorship: Why Librarians are Better Together

Read Now
The Chilling Impact of Censorship in Higher Education

The Chilling Impact of Censorship in Higher Education

Perhaps because college students are generally considered adults, and college and university campuses and classrooms have long been viewed as places to […]

Read Now
How Science Can Adapt to a New Normal

How Science Can Adapt to a New Normal

Scientific institutions are in full scramble. No amount of diplomacy or charity can interpret the modern moment as anything other than an […]

Read Now
When Common Sense is Neither

When Common Sense is Neither

It’s “the revolution of common sense,” President Donald Trump announced in his second inaugural address. And so it is. The latest installment […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments