Academic Funding

A new binary divide? Social science after concentration, and how to cope…

March 10, 2011 1471

Perri 6, Professor of Social Policy at Nottingham Trent University, has produced a detailed analysis of the implications of concentrating doctoral training at a restricted number of universities in the UK. While this may well result in a deep division in the sector between research and teaching universities, he argues that this is not inevitable, and sets out ways that universities can adapt to meet the challenges they face.

The national press largely missed the huge significance for higher education of the Economic and Social Research Council’s (ESRC’s) announcement in January that it will now support doctoral training in just twenty one centres. Some of these are made up of consortia of universities. Many universities which had high hopes of being awarded a centre were unsuccessful. Moreover, ESRC decided, after seeing the Treasury’s announcements of cuts in the Council’s funding, not to fund any smaller Doctoral Training Units at all. Those would have covered fewer disciplines and smaller numbers of students than the Centres. Typically, smaller universities not in consortia and post-1992 universities applied for those.

This decision is the harbinger of a much deeper degree of concentration that could lead to a stark, new division in the sector between research and teaching universities – at least in the social sciences, and in all probability quite generally. That, of course, would probably be the preference of the Russell Group anyway. It has implications for the Research Excellence Framework (REF), for ‘Quality Related’ (QR) research funding awarded in consequence of the REF, for the future of ESRC itself, for academics’ decisions about their careers, and for the choice of university that students make even for their undergraduate courses, let alone for their master’s courses.

Let’s start with what ESRC has done, before examining what it will definitely mean, and then considering a little more speculatively what it might mean – if we are not careful. To understand the scale of what has happened, it’s important to understand how the system has worked until this year…

 The full article is available as a pdf file.

Related Articles

Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment
Investment
May 15, 2025

Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment

Read Now
How NIH Funding Works − Until It’s Gone
Investment
May 14, 2025

How NIH Funding Works − Until It’s Gone

Read Now
Pope Francis, Human Dignity, and the Right to Stay, Migrate and Return
International Debate
May 5, 2025

Pope Francis, Human Dignity, and the Right to Stay, Migrate and Return

Read Now
Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase
Infrastructure
April 17, 2025

Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase

Read Now
The Academy and the Authoritarian: Stories from the 20th Century

The Academy and the Authoritarian: Stories from the 20th Century

Many American universities, widely seen globally as beacons of academic integrity and free speech, are giving in to demands from the Trump […]

Read Now
How Can You Serve the Globe’s People If You Don’t Know How Many There Are?

How Can You Serve the Globe’s People If You Don’t Know How Many There Are?

Every day, decisions that affect our lives depend on knowing how many people live where. For example, how many vaccines are needed […]

Read Now
The End of the Free Trade Era?

The End of the Free Trade Era?

On April 2, United States President Donald Trump declared “liberation day,” unveiling a new tariff (tax on imported goods) regime that targets […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments