Academic Funding

A new binary divide? Social science after concentration, and how to cope…

March 10, 2011 1979

Perri 6, Professor of Social Policy at Nottingham Trent University, has produced a detailed analysis of the implications of concentrating doctoral training at a restricted number of universities in the UK. While this may well result in a deep division in the sector between research and teaching universities, he argues that this is not inevitable, and sets out ways that universities can adapt to meet the challenges they face.

The national press largely missed the huge significance for higher education of the Economic and Social Research Council’s (ESRC’s) announcement in January that it will now support doctoral training in just twenty one centres. Some of these are made up of consortia of universities. Many universities which had high hopes of being awarded a centre were unsuccessful. Moreover, ESRC decided, after seeing the Treasury’s announcements of cuts in the Council’s funding, not to fund any smaller Doctoral Training Units at all. Those would have covered fewer disciplines and smaller numbers of students than the Centres. Typically, smaller universities not in consortia and post-1992 universities applied for those.

This decision is the harbinger of a much deeper degree of concentration that could lead to a stark, new division in the sector between research and teaching universities – at least in the social sciences, and in all probability quite generally. That, of course, would probably be the preference of the Russell Group anyway. It has implications for the Research Excellence Framework (REF), for ‘Quality Related’ (QR) research funding awarded in consequence of the REF, for the future of ESRC itself, for academics’ decisions about their careers, and for the choice of university that students make even for their undergraduate courses, let alone for their master’s courses.

Let’s start with what ESRC has done, before examining what it will definitely mean, and then considering a little more speculatively what it might mean – if we are not careful. To understand the scale of what has happened, it’s important to understand how the system has worked until this year…

 The full article is available as a pdf file.

Related Articles

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal
Artificial Intelligence
March 10, 2026

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Read Now
After the University? Braiding a Path Forward
Higher Education Reform
January 21, 2026

After the University? Braiding a Path Forward

Read Now
What Is a University For, After Gaza?
Higher Education Reform
December 23, 2025

What Is a University For, After Gaza?

Read Now
An AI Authorship Protocol Aims to Sharpen a Sometimes-Fuzzy Line
Artificial Intelligence
December 10, 2025

An AI Authorship Protocol Aims to Sharpen a Sometimes-Fuzzy Line

Read Now
Stop the Rot, Fight the Malaise and Reclaim the Void!

Stop the Rot, Fight the Malaise and Reclaim the Void!

Reflecting on my 17 years of tertiary education and 19 years of teaching and learning, university life was mostly supportive and always […]

Read Now
Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?

Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?

The landscape of academic grant funding is notoriously competitive and plagued by lengthy, bureaucratic processes, exacerbated by difficulties in finding willing reviewers. Distributed […]

Read Now
Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment

Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment

Look closely at your mobile phone or tablet. Touch-screen technology, speech recognition, digital sound recording and the internet were all developed using […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments