Impact

National Science Foundation responds to Senate staff report

July 29, 2011 1368

Eddie Bernice Johnson, Ranking Minority Member of the National Science Foundation Committee, has released a  staff report refuting a recent Senate report on the NSF which claims that the agency had wasted  three billion dollars of federal funding.

The Congresswoman stated, “I am sure that the Senate staff report was intended to be an important, detailed review of NSF, but in the end, our Committee staff could find almost no actual savings in the report.  NSF does not have $1.7 billion that they can return to the Treasury.  The report offers no proof that NSF has $1.2 billion in programs that are duplicative with those of other agencies.  Finally the claim by the report’s authors that they could find $65 million in questionable research projects appears to be built on a very superficial examination of the awards—in fact, it appears that at least four of the cited studies were not even funded by NSF.”

“It is important to engage in a serious discussion of those areas of federal spending where we can save money.  However, that dialogue—and our subsequent decisions—should be rooted in the facts.  The allegations in the Senate staff report were very, very serious, but they turn out to be mistaken.  As a result, there is no information in the report that can help inform Congress’s decisions about NSF funding and priorities.”

Committee polls found that few researchers cited in the Senate report felt that it accurately described their work; furthermore, none of the researchers who responded to Committee staff questions had ever been contacted by Senate staff about the work cited in the Senate staff report.

Click here to read more about the Senate report, and Congresswoman Johnson’s response.

Editorial Assistant - Social Science Journals at SAGE in Los Angeles

View all posts by Lisa Hanson

Related Articles

ICE: Good People and Dirty Work
News
January 28, 2026

ICE: Good People and Dirty Work

Read Now
After the University? Braiding a Path Forward
Higher Education Reform
January 21, 2026

After the University? Braiding a Path Forward

Read Now
Why is It So Difficult to Agree About Masks and Respiratory Infections?
Public Policy
January 9, 2026

Why is It So Difficult to Agree About Masks and Respiratory Infections?

Read Now
Phantom for Your Browser: A Practical Guide to the Solana Wallet Extension
News
December 30, 2025

Phantom for Your Browser: A Practical Guide to the Solana Wallet Extension

Read Now
Polymarket Login, Crypto Betting, and How to Trade Events Without Getting Burned

Polymarket Login, Crypto Betting, and How to Trade Events Without Getting Burned

Okay, so check this out—prediction markets feel like a blend of Vegas odds and academic forecasting. Wow! They’re fast, they’re weirdly addictive, […]

Read Now
Scientists Should Keep in Mind It’s Called the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’ for a Reason

Scientists Should Keep in Mind It’s Called the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’ for a Reason

People often see science as a world apart: cool, rational and untouched by persuasion or performance. In this view, scientists simply discover […]

Read Now
What Is a University For, After Gaza?

What Is a University For, After Gaza?

What is a university for? Traditionally, education has long been seen as a foundation for ethical and intellectual life. Aristotle viewed learning […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments