Impact

National Science Foundation responds to Senate staff report

July 29, 2011 1409

Eddie Bernice Johnson, Ranking Minority Member of the National Science Foundation Committee, has released a  staff report refuting a recent Senate report on the NSF which claims that the agency had wasted  three billion dollars of federal funding.

The Congresswoman stated, “I am sure that the Senate staff report was intended to be an important, detailed review of NSF, but in the end, our Committee staff could find almost no actual savings in the report.  NSF does not have $1.7 billion that they can return to the Treasury.  The report offers no proof that NSF has $1.2 billion in programs that are duplicative with those of other agencies.  Finally the claim by the report’s authors that they could find $65 million in questionable research projects appears to be built on a very superficial examination of the awards—in fact, it appears that at least four of the cited studies were not even funded by NSF.”

“It is important to engage in a serious discussion of those areas of federal spending where we can save money.  However, that dialogue—and our subsequent decisions—should be rooted in the facts.  The allegations in the Senate staff report were very, very serious, but they turn out to be mistaken.  As a result, there is no information in the report that can help inform Congress’s decisions about NSF funding and priorities.”

Committee polls found that few researchers cited in the Senate report felt that it accurately described their work; furthermore, none of the researchers who responded to Committee staff questions had ever been contacted by Senate staff about the work cited in the Senate staff report.

Click here to read more about the Senate report, and Congresswoman Johnson’s response.

Editorial Assistant - Social Science Journals at SAGE in Los Angeles

View all posts by Lisa Hanson

Related Articles

Leon Casino: Dive Into Rapid‑Fire Gaming for Instant Thrills
News
March 26, 2026

Leon Casino: Dive Into Rapid‑Fire Gaming for Instant Thrills

Read Now
Jürgen Habermas, 1929-2026: Exponent of the Public Sphere
Impact
March 16, 2026

Jürgen Habermas, 1929-2026: Exponent of the Public Sphere

Read Now
Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal
Artificial Intelligence
March 10, 2026

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Read Now
Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026
Research
March 9, 2026

Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026

Read Now
Why trading volume in prediction markets matters more than you think — and how event-outcome mechanics drive it

Why trading volume in prediction markets matters more than you think — and how event-outcome mechanics drive it

What does high trading volume in a prediction market actually signal: superior information, a liquidity mirage, or simply good marketing? Traders often […]

Read Now
ICE: Good People and Dirty Work

ICE: Good People and Dirty Work

Watching recent events in Minneapolis from the comfortable distance of several thousand miles and a large ocean, my mind turned to an […]

Read Now
Why Your Next 2FA App Should Be an OTP Generator — and How to pick one that won’t let you down

Why Your Next 2FA App Should Be an OTP Generator — and How to pick one that won’t let you down

Whoa! I was setting up an account the other day and the site offered SMS for two-factor. Seriously? No way. My gut […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments