International Debate

Teaching Internet Ethics

June 11, 2012 1484

Apparently Luka Rocco Magnotta made videos of himself killing cats and eating parts of his murdered victim, making the videos available online.  In 2008 Tomohiro Kato announced on an internet bulletin board his intentions to kill people at random at noon in Tokyo’s Akihabara. He did just that in a spate of stabbings, lasting less than 20 minutes, that left 7 dead and at least 10 severely injured, before he was arrested.  The horror of these murders, as usual, gives criminologists, forensic psychologists and other commentators the opportunity to explore in public the causes of such violence.  But what is going somewhat unremarked is the way these men are broadcasting their intentions.

Letters to the newspapers from killers and other criminals are as old as newspapers, but there is something about the immediacy and anonymity of the internet and its ability to grab attention from a great mass of people who may not have a voice that will be listened to by authority that encourages its villainous use.  The ignorance that leads some people to believe that their Facebook or other social network context is just a private domain was also illustrated by the call to riot as part of last year’s riots.

This all reflects the downside of the democratisation of open communication that the internet provides. Without gatekeepers, or limits imposed by a need for technical sophistication, people with no awareness of the art of publication or any experience of the impact of their comments on a wide audience are able to use the internet unthinkingly. After the Kato killings there were a spate of copycat killings in Japan as well as dozens of announcements on the web of criminal intentions, not all of which were hoaxes.

It seems to me that this is the very nasty end of a continuum that has its roots in the freely available abuse and scatological comment that seems to infiltrate so many internet interactions. People think nothing of insulting each other openly on twitter and in other social media.  They will upload comments that are as inflammatory as they are ignorant.  I was therefore pleased to discover that in Japan, partly as a result of Kato’s actions, there is now a primer for school children in internet etiquette. Put together by Hiroko Kanoh at Yamagata University, where she teaches internet ethics, this is a friendly self-study book with cartoons to explain what is acceptable and not acceptable in the use of the internet. It comments on the impact of hoax postings, bullying and threatening as well as the physical dangers of being always on a mobile phone.  It seems to me that if this sort of guidance is not already happening in our schools it certainly should.

Professor David Canter, the internationally renowned applied social researcher and world-leading crime psychologist, is perhaps most widely known as one of the pioneers of "Offender Profiling" being the first to introduce its use to the UK.

View all posts by David Canter

Related Articles

Doing the Math on Equal Pay
Insights
November 8, 2024

Doing the Math on Equal Pay

Read Now
Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
Communication
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments