News

Critiquing the US News Media: Fake News and Real Money

November 27, 2017 1685

There’s an old saying that whoever pays the piper calls the tune. With that in mind, who funds the outlets that report the news – the real news – that Americans consume every day and that often serve to communicate the work of social scientists? How does that influence how or even what gets covered? And what about fake news? In the videos below, a trio of media professionals along with the former dean of the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, offer their savvy takes on these questions and more.

The sessions were drawn from a panel discussion, “Who is Paying That Reporter? Perspectives from the News Industry,” drawn from a September 1 panel hosted by SAGE Publishing in conjunction with the 2017 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. The panelists dig deep into the origins sand history of fake news and touch on the intersection of political science and political coverage.

Speakers include Steve Katz, publisher of Mother Jones; Linda Strean, director of media and web at the Public Policy Institute of California and formerly of The San Francisco Chronicle; and Nicholas Jackson, editor-in-chief at Pacific Standard. The panel is moderated professor Donald Kettl, who in addition to his work at Maryland is a nonresident senior fellow at the Partnership for Public Service, the Volcker Alliance, and the Brookings Institution.

What Do We Mean By Fake News?

Does Who Pays for the News Affect Its Trustworthiness?

What Happened to Having a Shared Media Literacy?

Has Identity Become Our Personal News Editor?

Is Post-Truth Malaise a Terminal Disease?

Can You Explain the Gap Between Political News and Political Science?

Does History Show a Way Out of Fake News Maze?

Won’t Your Funding Source Affect Your News Decisions?

What Should Media Tell Political Scientists?


Related Articles

Seventh Edition of ‘The Evidence’: The Rise of Unsafe Abortions after Roe v Wade 
Bookshelf
August 30, 2024

Seventh Edition of ‘The Evidence’: The Rise of Unsafe Abortions after Roe v Wade 

Read Now
Where Did We Get the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?
Communication
August 14, 2024

Where Did We Get the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?

Read Now
Artificial Intelligence and the Social and Behavioral Sciences
News
August 6, 2024

Artificial Intelligence and the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Read Now
Sixth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: We Need a New Approach to Preventing Sexual Violence
Bookshelf
July 26, 2024

Sixth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: We Need a New Approach to Preventing Sexual Violence

Read Now
Stop Buying Cobras: Halting the Rise of Fake Academic Papers

Stop Buying Cobras: Halting the Rise of Fake Academic Papers

It is estimated that all journals, irrespective of discipline, experience a steeply rising number of fake paper submissions. Currently, the rate is about 2 percent. That may sound small. But, given the large and growing amount of scholarly publications it means that a lot of fake papers are published. Each of these can seriously damage patients, society or nature when applied in practice.

Read Now
Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive

Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive

The retraction of academic papers often functions as an indictment against a researcher’s reputation. Tim Kersjes argues that for retractions to function as an effective corrective to the scholarly record, they need shed this punitive reputation.

Read Now
Uncovering ‘Sneaked References’ in an Article’s Metadata

Uncovering ‘Sneaked References’ in an Article’s Metadata

The authors describe how by chance they learned how some actors have added extra references, invisible in the text but present in the articles’ metadata, when those unscrupulous actors submitted the articles to scientific databases.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments