Impact

When They Connect with Researchers, are Practitioners Time-Sensitive? Impact
Male hand with classic stopwatch. (XXL-File)

When They Connect with Researchers, are Practitioners Time-Sensitive?

July 22, 2019 2614

Background: In early 2018 I reached out to several practitioners’ listservs and invited them to share problems they were facing in their work in which they thought research might be helpful. In response I would match them with a social scientist one-on-one. I targeted listservs composed of non-partisan, non-profit organizations with a mission to remedy social ills. 37 practitioners responded over several months.

Based on these requests I identified four reasons why nonprofit practitioners want to engage with social scientists: 1) to receive an overview of a research literature, 2) to help make an immediate evidence based decision, 3) to gain ideas about how to measure impact, and 4) to collaborate on a new project (see here for more details: www.r4impact.org/how-it-works).

Main Finding: These requests also help answer another important question: When they connect with researchers, are practitioners time-sensitive? Traditionally one of the biggest obstacles to building relationships between researchers and practitioners is different time scales — nonprofits’ “focus is urgent, immediate, and often in response to events…moving quickly and loudly” whereas “academics work to a different rhythm”.

The requests for matchmaking in some ways echo this concern and in some ways do not. Overall, very few of the practitioners (16%) expressed any time sensitivity, yet it varied depending upon their goals. Of the 37 practitioners, 3 faced near-term decisions and wanted to use research to ensure these decisions were evidence-based. All of them expressed time-sensitivity. Beyond these three, the most frequent time-sensitive requests arose when practitioners were interested in collaborating with a researcher on a new project. These practitioners had funding in place and staff time already allocated, and faced a specific timeline for getting the collaboration off the ground. Overall, however, these data show how practitioners are often not time-sensitive when interacting with researchers.

Proportion of Practitioners Expressing Time-Sensitivity
(For everyone, and by goal; N=37)

All practitioners16%
Goal 1: To receive an overview of a large research literature 0%
Goal 2: To make an immediate evidence-based decision 100%
Goal 3: To gain ideas about how to measure impact 14%
Goal 4: To collaborate with a researcher on a new project 44%

Check out www.r4impact.org/how-it-works for more on what we’re learning about researcher-practitioner relationships!


Previous post in series:

When Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers?

Do Practitioners Prefer to Connect with Researchers who are Local?

Do Practitioners Prefer Self or Hands-on Matchmaking?

Do Researchers Want to Engage with Practitioners?

Do Researchers Share New Information or Just Tell Practitioners what they Already Know?

Adam Seth Levine is a professor of government at Cornell University. He is the "chief matchmaker" at research4impact, an organization he co-founded with Jake Bowers and Donald P. Green.

View all posts by Adam S. Levine

Related Articles

NSF’s Embattled SBE Directorate Shown as Agency’s Policy Heavyweight
Impact
August 10, 2026

NSF’s Embattled SBE Directorate Shown as Agency’s Policy Heavyweight

Read Now
Sage’s 10-Year Impact Awards Capture Longer-Term Significance
Announcements
July 28, 2026

Sage’s 10-Year Impact Awards Capture Longer-Term Significance

Read Now
Quick Insight: Adam Seth Levine on Research4Impact
Impact
June 30, 2026

Quick Insight: Adam Seth Levine on Research4Impact

Read Now
Kenneth Prewitt, 1936–2026: At the Nexus of Academe, Policy and Philanthropy
Recognition
June 9, 2026

Kenneth Prewitt, 1936–2026: At the Nexus of Academe, Policy and Philanthropy

Read Now
Whose Work Most Influenced You? Part 6: A Social Science Bites Retrospective

Whose Work Most Influenced You? Part 6: A Social Science Bites Retrospective

Every guest on the Social Science Bites podcast is queried about their area of expertise, and hence the questions tend to differ […]

Read Now
Watch the Webinar: Empowering Social and Behavioral Science Researchers

Watch the Webinar: Empowering Social and Behavioral Science Researchers

In 2024, Sage surveyed social and behavioral science (SBS) researchers from 96 countries to better understand their motivation, if any, to conduct […]

Read Now
Jürgen Habermas, 1929-2026: Exponent of the Public Sphere

Jürgen Habermas, 1929-2026: Exponent of the Public Sphere

Jürgen Habermas, a globally known social theorist whose explorations of democracy, validity and communication have gained new prominence in the current moment, […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted