When Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers?


Background: In early 2018 I reached out to several practitioners’ listservs and invited them to share problems they were facing in their work in which they thought research might be helpful. In response I would match them with a social scientist one-on-one. I targeted listservs composed of non-partisan, non-profit organizations with a mission to remedy social ills. 37 practitioners responded over several months.

Based on these requests I identified four reasons why nonprofit practitioners want to engage with social scientists: 1) to receive an overview of a research literature, 2) to help make an immediate evidence-based decision, 3) to gain ideas about how to measure impact, and 4) to collaborate on a new project (see here for more details: www.r4impact.org/how-it-works).

This is the first of a series of short posts by Adam S. Levine spotlighting what the organization Research4Impact has learned about connecting social science researches with practitioners. Each post will be downloadable as a one-sheet PDF.

Main Finding: These requests also help answer another important question: When do practitioners find social science valuable? One perspective is that, at least in principle, they are always open to learning more about research. An alternative is that their availability varies over time as the nature of their work and/or personal circumstances change.

Here I measured whether practitioners were going through a moment of transition. Moments of transition arose because the practitioner was part of a new initiative at their organization and/or because they had just started a new job or gained a new responsibility. Those not facing a moment of transition were not in a new position and cited a long-standing organizational goal in which research would be helpful.

As shown below, most of the 37 practitioners that reached out were facing a moment of transition. That was especially the case among those looking to collaborate with a researcher, and less so among those looking to gain ideas about how to measure the impact of their work. In the latter cases I observed such desires arose from long-standing internal pressures to gain better metrics. Going forward, these results provide important evidence for outreach efforts aiming to connect researchers and practitioners.

Proportion of Practitioners Facing a Moment of Transition
(For everyone, and by goal; N=37)

All practitioners 68%
Goal 1: To receive an overview of a large research literature 70%
Goal 2: To help make an immediate evidence-based decision 67%
Goal 3: To gain ideas about how to measure impact 29%
Goal 4: To collaborate with a researcher on a new project 100%

For a PDF version of this post, please click HERE.

Check out www.r4impact.org/how-it-works for more on what we’re learning about researcher-practitioner relationships!


Previous post in series:

Do Practitioners Prefer to Connect with Researchers who are Local?

When They Connect with Researchers, are Practitioners Time-Sensitive?

Do Practitioners Prefer Self or Hands-on Matchmaking?

Do Researchers Want to Engage with Practitioners?

Do Researchers Share New Information or Just Tell Practitioners what they Already Know?

Adam S. Levine

Adam Seth Levine is a professor of government at Cornell University. He is the "chief matchmaker" at research4impact, an organization he co-founded with Jake Bowers and Donald P. Green.

Leave a Reply

avatar

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Skip to toolbar