Impact

Do Researchers Share New Information or Just Tell Practitioners What They Already Know?

August 12, 2019 2824

Background: In early 2018 I reached out to several practitioners’ listsers and invited them to share problems they were facing in their work in which they thought research might be helpful. In response I would match them with a social scientist one-on-one. I targeted listsers composed of non-partisan, non-profit organizations with a mission to remedy social ills. 37 practitioners responded over several months.

Based on these requests I identified four reasons why nonprofit practitioners want to engage with social scientists: 1) to receive an overview of a research literature, 2) to help make an immediate evidence based decision, 3) to gain ideas about how to measure impact, and 4) to collaborate on a new project (see here for more details: www.r4impact.org/how-it-works).

This is the sixth of a series of short posts by Adam S. Levine spotlighting what the organization Research4Impact has learned about connecting social science researches with practitioners. Each post will be downloadable as a one-sheet PDF.

Main Finding: When practitioners first learn about the matches we do at r4i, one question that sometimes arises is whether it’s worth taking the time to speak with a researcher – are the researchers providing new information, or are they just telling practitioners what they already know (perhaps based on personal experiences, intuition, previous exposure to research, etc.)?

Here I use the 2018 data to help answer this question, focusing specifically on the practitioners that were looking for an overview of a research literature (which was 20 of 37 practitioners). After the conversations took place I followed-up with them to see if they gained new and useful information addressing their current needs (and, if not, I would match them with another researcher).

Only one practitioner responded by saying that she was already familiar with the research they talked about. And, nevertheless, she described the conversation as “reassuring” because it signaled that she wasn’t missing anything big (and also underscored to her and the researcher she spoke with that there is still a lot to learn about the topic!).

Did researchers share new info?
(N=20; only includes practitioners seeking an overview of a research literature)

Proportion of practitioners who reported that they were already familiar with the research discussed during the conversation 5%

For a PDF version of this post, please click HERE.

Check out www.r4impact.org/how-it-works for more on what we’re learning about researcher-practitioner relationships!


Previous post in series:

When Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers?

Do Practitioners Prefer to Connect with Researchers who are Local?

Do Practitioners Prefer Self or Hands-on Matchmaking?

When They Connect with Researchers, are Practitioners Time-Sensitive?

Do Researchers Want to Engage with Practitioners?

Adam Seth Levine is a professor of government at Cornell University. He is the "chief matchmaker" at research4impact, an organization he co-founded with Jake Bowers and Donald P. Green.

View all posts by Adam S. Levine

Related Articles

Outstanding Social and Behavioral Scientists Sought for Sage-CASBS Award
Recognition
October 20, 2025

Outstanding Social and Behavioral Scientists Sought for Sage-CASBS Award

Read Now
Share Your Most Surprising Policy Citation for Chance to Win $500 [Closed]
Announcements
October 17, 2025

Share Your Most Surprising Policy Citation for Chance to Win $500 [Closed]

Read Now
We See Economic Growth Differently Thanks to the 2025 Nobelists in Economics
Impact
October 14, 2025

We See Economic Growth Differently Thanks to the 2025 Nobelists in Economics

Read Now
Popular Paper Examines Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Analysis
Impact
July 10, 2025

Popular Paper Examines Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Analysis

Read Now
Examining How Open Research Affects Vulnerable Participants

Examining How Open Research Affects Vulnerable Participants

Open research has become a buzzword in university research, but Jo Hemlatha and Thomas Graves argue that when it comes to qualitative research, considerations around replicability, context-dependent methods and the sensitivity of data from marginalized people mean that openness takes many different forms.

Read Now
Valentin-Yves Mudimbe, 1941-2025: The Philosopher on the ‘Invention’ of Africa

Valentin-Yves Mudimbe, 1941-2025: The Philosopher on the ‘Invention’ of Africa

Congolese thinker, philosopher and linguist Valentin-Yves Mudimbe died on April 21, 2025 at the age of 83. He was in the US, […]

Read Now
Christopher Jencks, 1936-2025: An Innovative Voice on Inequality

Christopher Jencks, 1936-2025: An Innovative Voice on Inequality

Christopher Jencks, known for his novel and inventive opinions on hot topic issues like income inequality, homelessness, and racial gaps in standardized […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments