Impact

Do Researchers Share New Information or Just Tell Practitioners What They Already Know?

August 12, 2019 2901

Background: In early 2018 I reached out to several practitioners’ listsers and invited them to share problems they were facing in their work in which they thought research might be helpful. In response I would match them with a social scientist one-on-one. I targeted listsers composed of non-partisan, non-profit organizations with a mission to remedy social ills. 37 practitioners responded over several months.

Based on these requests I identified four reasons why nonprofit practitioners want to engage with social scientists: 1) to receive an overview of a research literature, 2) to help make an immediate evidence based decision, 3) to gain ideas about how to measure impact, and 4) to collaborate on a new project (see here for more details: www.r4impact.org/how-it-works).

This is the sixth of a series of short posts by Adam S. Levine spotlighting what the organization Research4Impact has learned about connecting social science researches with practitioners. Each post will be downloadable as a one-sheet PDF.

Main Finding: When practitioners first learn about the matches we do at r4i, one question that sometimes arises is whether it’s worth taking the time to speak with a researcher – are the researchers providing new information, or are they just telling practitioners what they already know (perhaps based on personal experiences, intuition, previous exposure to research, etc.)?

Here I use the 2018 data to help answer this question, focusing specifically on the practitioners that were looking for an overview of a research literature (which was 20 of 37 practitioners). After the conversations took place I followed-up with them to see if they gained new and useful information addressing their current needs (and, if not, I would match them with another researcher).

Only one practitioner responded by saying that she was already familiar with the research they talked about. And, nevertheless, she described the conversation as “reassuring” because it signaled that she wasn’t missing anything big (and also underscored to her and the researcher she spoke with that there is still a lot to learn about the topic!).

Did researchers share new info?
(N=20; only includes practitioners seeking an overview of a research literature)

Proportion of practitioners who reported that they were already familiar with the research discussed during the conversation 5%

For a PDF version of this post, please click HERE.

Check out www.r4impact.org/how-it-works for more on what we’re learning about researcher-practitioner relationships!


Previous post in series:

When Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers?

Do Practitioners Prefer to Connect with Researchers who are Local?

Do Practitioners Prefer Self or Hands-on Matchmaking?

When They Connect with Researchers, are Practitioners Time-Sensitive?

Do Researchers Want to Engage with Practitioners?

Adam Seth Levine is a professor of government at Cornell University. He is the "chief matchmaker" at research4impact, an organization he co-founded with Jake Bowers and Donald P. Green.

View all posts by Adam S. Levine

Related Articles

Scientists Should Keep in Mind It’s Called the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’ for a Reason
Communication
December 29, 2025

Scientists Should Keep in Mind It’s Called the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’ for a Reason

Read Now
Survey Finds Social Scientists Feel Unsupported in Seeking Societal Impact
Impact
December 18, 2025

Survey Finds Social Scientists Feel Unsupported in Seeking Societal Impact

Read Now
Canada’s SSHRC Names 2025 Impact Winners
Impact
December 15, 2025

Canada’s SSHRC Names 2025 Impact Winners

Read Now
There Is a Cost to Being Honest About Science
Impact
December 8, 2025

There Is a Cost to Being Honest About Science

Read Now
Outstanding Social and Behavioral Scientists Sought for Sage-CASBS Award

Outstanding Social and Behavioral Scientists Sought for Sage-CASBS Award

Do you know a social or behavioral science researcher whose work resonates across disciplines and which has made a significant impact in […]

Read Now
Share Your Most Surprising Policy Citation for Chance to Win $500 [Closed]

Share Your Most Surprising Policy Citation for Chance to Win $500 [Closed]

Please note: this contest has now closed. The winner will be contacted in due course. This November, Sage and Overton invite you to share the unexpected […]

Read Now
We See Economic Growth Differently Thanks to the 2025 Nobelists in Economics

We See Economic Growth Differently Thanks to the 2025 Nobelists in Economics

What makes some countries rich and others poor? Is there any action a country can take to improve living standards for its […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments