Investment

Senate Appropriations Panel Submits Budget for Science Agency

November 11, 2020 2618

Although the presidential election sucked all the available oxygen out of America’s body politic, the business of running the government is returning slowly and Tuesday, the U.S. Senate’s Appropriations Committee released the text of its budget for federal commerce, justice and science (CJS) agencies, including the National Science Foundation. Committee members called for allocating $8.478 billion for NSF, which is $200 million more than the foundation received this year but about $70 million less than the $8.55 billion that the House of Representatives recommended in its appropriations bill released four months ago. All told, the Senate appropriations bill comes to $71.1 billion; the House version came to $71.5 billion.

The bill must still pass the full Senate, and any final legislation would need to reconcile the two amounts, as well as other outstanding differences in the omnibus spending bill. That legislation then must be signed by the president. The CJS bill is one of 12 such omnibus funding bills that make up the entire U.S. government budget; the Senate committee released the text all of them on Tuesday.

As the Consortium of Social Science Associations noted in its analysis of the Senate legislation – available via PDF here — since appropriations legislation constitutionally arises in the House, “Senators are not expected to take up the bills on the Senate floor; rather, their bills are meant as a jumping off point for negotiations with the House on a final deal.”

The White House request for the NSF would have reduced the NSF budget by $365 million compared to 2020 fiscal year, so both chambers of Congress are asking for more than the agency itself officially requested. The American social science community watches the NSF budget closely, for while it is by no means the only agency that funds social and behavioral science research, it is the largest source of research funding for university social and behavioral science in the United States.

It’s worth noting that this is the request for the 2021 fiscal year, which began on October 1. The U.S. government has been running on a continuing resolution, a resolution which expires on December 11. Despite the lack of action, the Trump administration has begun preparing a budget for 2022, even though this administration’s advisory proposal – already the most notional in modern history – will have no standing.

A lengthy explanatory report accompanied both the House and Senate appropriations bill, and while the House document specifically notes its support for the NSF’s Social, Behavioral and Economic Science Directorate, the Senate document does not make specific mention of social and behavioral science in any form.

For more on the other areas of the social science enterprise affected by the CJS bill, such as the National Institutes of Health or the Bureau of Economic Analysis, please examine the COSSA analysis here.

Related Articles

Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?
Infrastructure
October 20, 2025

Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?

Read Now
SSRC Stands Up Economic Research Rescue Fund for Researchers Hurt by NSF Cuts
Investment
August 28, 2025

SSRC Stands Up Economic Research Rescue Fund for Researchers Hurt by NSF Cuts

Read Now
What You Can Do As Data U.S. Taxpayers Paid For and Use Disappears
Industry
August 21, 2025

What You Can Do As Data U.S. Taxpayers Paid For and Use Disappears

Read Now
Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment
Investment
May 15, 2025

Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment

Read Now
How NIH Funding Works − Until It’s Gone

How NIH Funding Works − Until It’s Gone

In its first 100 days, the Trump administration terminated more than US$2 billion in federal grants, according to a public source database […]

Read Now
Long-Term Impact Requires Archiving Research Communication

Long-Term Impact Requires Archiving Research Communication

In recent years there has been an increased focus on how research papers and supplemental data can be preserved openly. Andy Tattersall, Liz Such, Joe Langley and Fiona Marshall argue equal attention should also be paid to curating communication outputs aimed at engaging non-academic audiences.

Read Now
Your Eyes May Widen at What Ted Cruz Designates as ‘Woke’

Your Eyes May Widen at What Ted Cruz Designates as ‘Woke’

A few months ago, Sen. Ted Cruz announced that he had uncovered $2 billion of science grants funded by former President Joe […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments