Industry

White House Memo Details Progress on SBS Development

September 30, 2022 1898

A memo released this month by the White House during its self-proclaimed “Tear of Evidence for Action” updated plans to ensure evidence-based social and behavioral research is used by the United States government. The memo outlines actions of the National Science and Technology Council’s Social and Behavioral Sciences Subcommittee (SBS) of the Committee on Science of the National Science and Technology Council, including a plan to advance evidence-based policymaking by April 2023.

The SBS was established for purpose including determining best practices for the use of social and behavioral science evidence in Federal policymaking and practices, improving research and development coordination, providing guidance to the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and identifying topics where social and behavioral science can be used to accomplish priorities. “The social and behavioral sciences,” the memo notes, “offer unique tools for describing, understanding, and addressing societal challenges, and assessing and evaluating initiatives, programs, and policies.

The subcommittee was decommissioned during the Trump administration, but the Biden administration formally rechartered SBS in April as part of the “Year of Evidence for Action” initiative. This initiative, co-chartered by the OSTP and the Office of Management and Budget, sought to increase collaboration between researchers and the government, share federal agencies’ leading practices to generate greater knowledge and expand strategies and structures to increase the capacity for evidence-backed policymaking.

The memo provides information about progress on the SBS’ first task, delivering a whole-of-government framework for the use of social and behavioral research in evidence-based policymaking by April 30, 2023. The SBS has established interagency working, groups, which are aimed at five of the administration’s focuses: accessibility of digital infrastructure and services; communicating hazard information and other types of uncertainty; decarbonization and justice; good jobs; and safely reducing criminal justice system interactions, improving rehabilitation during incarceration and enhancing Re-entry.

Additionally, several cross-cutting questions have been established to help guide the groups’ progress. These questions include an emphasis on preexisting research, established successful methods, current research on applicable topics in progress, possibilities of collaborative efforts, unique contributions the social and behavioral sciences have on topics of interest and identifying opportunities and barriers for research and its findings being implemented into policy outcomes.

Further information will be shared with the public as it is available.

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves
Ethics
June 4, 2024

How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves

Read Now
Opportunity to Participate in RFI on Proposed National Secure Data Service
Announcements
May 28, 2024

Opportunity to Participate in RFI on Proposed National Secure Data Service

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society
Industry
May 28, 2024

Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Read Now
Biden Administration Releases ‘Blueprint’ For Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy
News
May 17, 2024

Biden Administration Releases ‘Blueprint’ For Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Read Now
Celebrating 20 Years of an Afrocentric Small Scholarly Press

Celebrating 20 Years of an Afrocentric Small Scholarly Press

To mark the Black- and female-owned Universal Write Publications’ 20th anniversary, Sage’s Geane De Lima asked UWP fonder Ayo Sekai some questions about UWP’s past, present and future.

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Makes an Outsized Impact on Policy

Why Social Science? Because It Makes an Outsized Impact on Policy

Euan Adie, founder of Altmetric and Overton and currently Overton’s managing director, answers questions about the outsized impact that SBS makes on policy and his work creating tools to connect the scholarly and policy worlds.

Read Now
The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting

The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting

Based on a study of how research is cited in national and local media sources, Andy Tattersall shows how research is often poorly represented in the media and suggests better community standards around linking to original research could improve trust in mainstream media.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments