International Debate

In Defense of Qualitative Research – A PhD Researcher’s Experience

February 10, 2023 1643

Even though qualitative research is more respected nowadays, it is still seen in some academic circles just as a starting point in research. We still live in a world where quantitative approaches are dominant and considered more robust for relying on numerical or measurable data. These methods allow us to measure variables and test hypotheses, whereas qualitative methods “only” allow us to explore beliefs, experiences, and understandings. The measurability gives them credibility, for numbers can be measured and evaluated, while interviews, focus groups or participant observation are subject to individual perceptions. As a PhD researcher, I have heard multiple times that conducting qualitative research is not as “good” as quantitative research, that it has too many “weaknesses” and it won’t be as easy to publish.

This post from Andrea Pérez Porres originally appeared on the SAGE perspectives blog, which highlights topical and interesting research published in SAGE books and journals

Although there is a bias against qualitative research, not every type of data can be handled using quantitative, and human behavior cannot always be reduced to numbers. There is complex data surrounding beliefs, attitudes, emotions, and understandings that needs the stories behind it to really understand the “why’s” and “how’s.” These questions are not always quantifiable, and they can have an impact on important decision-making processes. People’s beliefs and experiences shape the world. They influence changes in the institutions that shape development, and they influence societies’ structures.

Thus, qualitative research is extremely important. As a qualitative doctoral researcher myself, it is sometimes easy to fall into the belief that qualitative research is not as robust as quantitative research. I am researching how social movements understand innovation and technology beyond economic growth, and therefore I am focusing on the narratives and discourses that people have. Qualitative methods are frequently used in science, technology and innovation studies, as they allow the study of socio-technical imaginaries and explore the role of science, innovation, and technology in society. In addition to this, qualitative methods are very predominant as well in social movements studies. For me, the only way to conduct my study and answer my research questions is through qualitative research methods such as in-depth interviews and participant observation.

However, we are still bombarded by beliefs and biases that qualitative research is simpler, even easier sometimes. Nonetheless, something that people tend to forget is that qualitative thinking is also mixed within all the steps in the process of scientific work and research. Even when calculations are being processed by a machine, qualitative interpretations have had to be programmed into it beforehand. Qualitative research is everywhere, and it is as important and needed as quantitative research.

One of the challenges of qualitative research is that qualitative thinking will change from researcher to researcher, everyone does it differently. In addition to this, smaller sample sizes than in quantitative research can make generalization more difficult. However, it moves away from the cause-effect explanation towards a more complex understanding of reality. The main mistake here is to judge qualitative research by quantitative standards, qualitative research needs its own criteria. The criteria for assessing and evaluating qualitative research methods will differ from method to method, qualitative research is not a cohesive discipline and not one specific set of quality criteria is feasible, as explained in the article by Drishti Yadav on “Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review”.

No research method is perfect, and sometimes it might be better to use qualitative methods in conjunction with quantitative methods. But sometimes, it might not, and it should be just as valid.

Andrea Pérez Porres is a second-year PhD student in the Science Policy Research Unit at Sussex University. Her research focuses on social movements in the UK and how they are re-thinking innovation beyond economic growth for sustainability transitions. She is also one of the 2022/23 Hive Scholars.

View all posts by Andrea Pérez Porres

Related Articles

Young Explorers Award Honors Scholars at Nexus of Life and Social Science
Announcements
May 9, 2024

Young Explorers Award Honors Scholars at Nexus of Life and Social Science

Read Now
The Long Arm of Criminality
Opinion
April 29, 2024

The Long Arm of Criminality

Read Now
New Funding Opportunity for Criminal and Juvenile Justice Doctoral Researchers
Infrastructure
March 7, 2024

New Funding Opportunity for Criminal and Juvenile Justice Doctoral Researchers

Read Now
Economist Kaye Husbands Fealing to Lead NSF’s Social Science Directorate
Announcements
February 29, 2024

Economist Kaye Husbands Fealing to Lead NSF’s Social Science Directorate

Read Now
Why Don’t Algorithms Agree With Each Other?

Why Don’t Algorithms Agree With Each Other?

David Canter reviews his experience of filling in automated forms online for the same thing but getting very different answers, revealing the value systems built into these supposedly neutral processes.

Read Now
Addressing the United Kingdom’s Lack of Black Scholars

Addressing the United Kingdom’s Lack of Black Scholars

In the UK, out of 164 university vice-chancellors, only two are Black. Professor David Mba was recently appointed as the first Black vice-chancellor […]

Read Now
A Black History Addendum to the American Music Industry

A Black History Addendum to the American Music Industry

The new editor of the case study series on the music industry discusses the history of Black Americans in the recording industry.

Read Now
4 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sue Oliver PhD

I agree wholeheartedly that we qualitative researchers seem to be obliged to work harder to justify our findings as credible and trustworthy and contributing to the existing body of knowledge in our subject area. i have been involved in qualitative research since the early 1990s and have seen the development from having to ‘prove’ the efficacy of my data analysis, to the stage of arguing convincingly for validity through trustworthiness, dependability and various other qualities. However, our chosen research discipline enables us to perceive and understand human conditions to a depth that quantitative methods cannot. There is a place for… Read more »