Communication

Survey Asks Questions About Scholarly Journal Use

March 27, 2018 1186

Filling out a surveyHow, as a researcher, do you find and then use information in your work? This has been a question Carol Tenopir, a chancellor’s professor at the School of Information Sciences at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, has been asking in a series of surveys for decades.

In this year’s survey, Tenopir is looking specifically at your scholarly reading habits; she aims to assess the value of access to scholarly journals by examining patterns of use and reading. We say ‘your’ reading habits because the online survey is now accepting answers to these questions and encourages the readers of Social Science Space and MethodSpace to give their feedback. All answers are anonymous and while the final dataset may be available in an open data repository it will be cleaned to remove any potentially identifying information.


The take the survey, click here: https://utk.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cAPYQ8w1vhpSHfD


“Gaining a better understanding of how academics use journals,” Tenopir writes in the introductory page to the survey, “will provide insights into designing future journals and collections as well as assisting in understanding the evolving nature of scholarly reading.”

The survey consists of a short section about you, reading practices, scholarly article reading, other publication reading, and social media and should take about 20 minutes to complete.

If you have any questions about the study or procedures, please contact Tenopir at ctenopir@utk.edu.


Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, is a global academic publisher of books, journals, and library resources with a growing range of technologies to enable discovery, access, and engagement. Believing that research and education are critical in shaping society, 24-year-old Sara Miller McCune founded Sage in 1965. Today, we are controlled by a group of trustees charged with maintaining our independence and mission indefinitely. 

View all posts by Sage

Related Articles

Striving for Linguistic Diversity in Scientific Research
Communication
May 1, 2024

Striving for Linguistic Diversity in Scientific Research

Read Now
Civilisation – and Some Discontents
Public Engagement
April 30, 2024

Civilisation – and Some Discontents

Read Now
Third Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Can We Overcome Sexism in AI?
Bookshelf
April 29, 2024

Third Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Can We Overcome Sexism in AI?

Read Now
Exploring ‘Lost Person Behavior’ and the Science of Search and Rescue
Featured
April 24, 2024

Exploring ‘Lost Person Behavior’ and the Science of Search and Rescue

Read Now
Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

The second issue of The Evidence explores the intersection of gender inequality and the global climate crisis. Author Josephine Lethbridge recounts the […]

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

The processes of mainstreaming and normalization of far-right politics have much to do with the mainstream itself, if not more than with the far right.

Read Now
The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

Retractions are generally framed as a negative: as science not working properly, as an embarrassment for the institutions involved, or as a flaw in the peer review process. They can be all those things. But they can also be part of a story of science working the right way: finding and correcting errors, and publicly acknowledging when information turns out to be incorrect.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments