Could Distributed Peer Review Better Decide Grant Funding?
The landscape of academic grant funding is notoriously competitive and plagued by lengthy, bureaucratic processes, exacerbated by difficulties in finding willing reviewers. Distributed […]
Do students learn what their professors intend them to learn? What are the challenges associated with effective utilization of rubrics? What is […]
Gerald F. Davis, editor of Administrative Science Quarterly, explores this question in his editorial essay from the June issue of from Administrative Science […]
Becoming a member of an editorial board can be a paramount step in the life of an academic. Scholars are able to […]
Last December, President Obama said in an interview with talk-show host Steve Harvey that “You can’t take yourself too seriously.” The president went […]
The publishing industry can be competitive. But how far will a potential researcher go to achieve success? Farther than you would think, […]
How do scholars define status? Alessandro Piazza and Fabrizio Castellucci, both of Bocconi University, point out in their article “Status in Organization and […]
We are pleased to congratulate John K. Kruschke of the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Indiana University and Herman Aguinis […]
We are pleased to highlight the 2013 Journal of Management Best Paper and Scholarly Impact Award winners! The Scholarly Impact Award, given […]