Featured

Song Lyrics, Twitter Help Chart Public Mood

July 20, 2011 1818

Michael Haederle describes a new research method to work out the mood of a group of people.

Social scientists seeking to assess the collective mood of large groups of people traditionally have relied on slow, laborious sampling methods that usually entail some form of self-reporting.

Peter Dodds and Chris Danforth, mathematicians at the University of Vermont, dreamed up an ingenious way to sample the feelings of many more people much more quickly.

They downloaded the lyrics to 232,000 popular songs composed between 1960 and 2007 and calculated how often emotion-laden words like “love,” “hate,” “pain” and “baby” occurred in each.

Then they graphed their results, averaging over the emotional valence of individual words. A clearly negative trend emerged over the 47-year period, from bright and happy (think Pat Boone) to dark and depressive (death metal and industrial music come to mind).

The pair has used similar methods to analyze millions of sentences downloaded from blogs, as well as the text of every U.S. State of the Union address and a vast trove of Twitter tweets.

They see distinctive patterns emerging in how collective moods shift over time. The Internet, with its ability to transmit vast amounts of data, is the key…

Click here to read the entire article in Miller McCune Magazine.

One of Library Journal’s Best Magazines of 2008, Miller-McCune not only identifies policy issues of global important but provides evidence-based solutions offered by academic research and real-world models. Through excellent but understandable writing and proven judgment in what to cover, the nonprofit Miller-McCune has received a surprising amount of acclaim and, more importantly, a large and growing audience interested in the social and natural sciences.

View all posts by Pacific-Standard Magazine

Related Articles

Who Do You Trust More: Your Colleagues or Your AI?
Artificial Intelligence
May 22, 2026

Who Do You Trust More: Your Colleagues or Your AI?

Read Now
Academic Authorship Confronts Ghosts, Gifts and Gender
Higher Education Reform
May 14, 2026

Academic Authorship Confronts Ghosts, Gifts and Gender

Read Now
From ‘Which Database?’ to ‘Under What Conditions?’: Teaching Critical Thinking Through Search Tool Selection in an AI Age
Critical Thinking
April 28, 2026

From ‘Which Database?’ to ‘Under What Conditions?’: Teaching Critical Thinking Through Search Tool Selection in an AI Age

Read Now
Celebrating Arab American Heritage Month
Interdisciplinarity
April 13, 2026

Celebrating Arab American Heritage Month

Read Now
Thinking Qualitatively: Making a Difference

Thinking Qualitatively: Making a Difference

Thinking Qualitatively (TQ) is an annual event of the International Institute for Qualitative Methodology that aims to advance understanding of qualitative methods among […]

Read Now
Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026

Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026

Eighty years ago this month, the United Kingdom pioneered a novel form of social science research, the life-long cohort study. The tool […]

Read Now
Measuring What Matters: Why Academic Pathways Need Shared Evidence, Not Just Good Intentions 

Measuring What Matters: Why Academic Pathways Need Shared Evidence, Not Just Good Intentions 

Across higher education, academic pathway programs play a critical role in widening access to degrees, research careers, and faculty positions for students who have […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments