International Debate

Scientists Take Their Concerns to Capitol Hill

July 2, 2013 1698

L to R:Justin Halberda (Johns Hopkins), Barbara Landau (Johns Hopkins), Rochelle Newman (University of Maryland), Michael R. Dougherty (University of Maryland), Paula Skedsvold (FABBS), Joe Tidwell (University of Maryland), Thomas S. Wallsten (University of Maryland), Joseph H. Danks (University of Maryland), Howard Egeth (Johns Hopkins)

A group of Maryland-based scientists visited Capitol Hill on Friday, June 14th to talk about the impact of diminished federal funding for science, sequestration’s additional blows to scientific advances, and the continued threats to SBE sciences. The goal was to share their concerns with one of their elected officials, Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The scientists met with appropriations staff about the difficult funding climate for science, the resulting “brain drain” in key areas of science, the challenges for senior investigators and those just entering science careers, and the importance of respecting the peer review process for identifying the best science.

All of the scientists launched their careers with fundamental (basic) science funding through the SBE Directorate at NSF. Now, years later, the research is leading to potential clinical health applications and uses in intelligence analysis, defense, and the private sector. The scientists highlighted their areas of research that are now addressing health and national security challenges, the interplay between basic and applied research, and the range of federal agencies interested in their programs of research.

One participant, decision scientist Tom Wallsten, commented: “As scientists, we need to educate ourselves about what is happening on Capitol Hill and express ourselves on the issues. The momentum is toward more cuts and more scrutiny for individual grants, broad fields of science, including ours, and accountability in using science funds. We need to educate Congress and the public on the many ways in which our research benefits society and the nation.”

Related Articles

Challenges to Democracy
Opinion
April 3, 2026

Challenges to Democracy

Read Now
Closing the Gap: Research, Representation and Women’s History at Sage
International Debate
March 30, 2026

Closing the Gap: Research, Representation and Women’s History at Sage

Read Now
Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal
Artificial Intelligence
March 10, 2026

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Read Now
Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026
Research
March 9, 2026

Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026

Read Now
Why trading volume in prediction markets matters more than you think — and how event-outcome mechanics drive it

Why trading volume in prediction markets matters more than you think — and how event-outcome mechanics drive it

What does high trading volume in a prediction market actually signal: superior information, a liquidity mirage, or simply good marketing? Traders often […]

Read Now
ICE: Good People and Dirty Work

ICE: Good People and Dirty Work

Watching recent events in Minneapolis from the comfortable distance of several thousand miles and a large ocean, my mind turned to an […]

Read Now
Why Your Next 2FA App Should Be an OTP Generator — and How to pick one that won’t let you down

Why Your Next 2FA App Should Be an OTP Generator — and How to pick one that won’t let you down

Whoa! I was setting up an account the other day and the site offered SMS for two-factor. Seriously? No way. My gut […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments