International Debate

Scientists Take Their Concerns to Capitol Hill

July 2, 2013 1664

L to R:Justin Halberda (Johns Hopkins), Barbara Landau (Johns Hopkins), Rochelle Newman (University of Maryland), Michael R. Dougherty (University of Maryland), Paula Skedsvold (FABBS), Joe Tidwell (University of Maryland), Thomas S. Wallsten (University of Maryland), Joseph H. Danks (University of Maryland), Howard Egeth (Johns Hopkins)

A group of Maryland-based scientists visited Capitol Hill on Friday, June 14th to talk about the impact of diminished federal funding for science, sequestration’s additional blows to scientific advances, and the continued threats to SBE sciences. The goal was to share their concerns with one of their elected officials, Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The scientists met with appropriations staff about the difficult funding climate for science, the resulting “brain drain” in key areas of science, the challenges for senior investigators and those just entering science careers, and the importance of respecting the peer review process for identifying the best science.

All of the scientists launched their careers with fundamental (basic) science funding through the SBE Directorate at NSF. Now, years later, the research is leading to potential clinical health applications and uses in intelligence analysis, defense, and the private sector. The scientists highlighted their areas of research that are now addressing health and national security challenges, the interplay between basic and applied research, and the range of federal agencies interested in their programs of research.

One participant, decision scientist Tom Wallsten, commented: “As scientists, we need to educate ourselves about what is happening on Capitol Hill and express ourselves on the issues. The momentum is toward more cuts and more scrutiny for individual grants, broad fields of science, including ours, and accountability in using science funds. We need to educate Congress and the public on the many ways in which our research benefits society and the nation.”

Related Articles

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal
Artificial Intelligence
March 10, 2026

Colleges Strategies on AI Really Should Be Comprehensive, Not Piecemeal

Read Now
Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026
Research
March 9, 2026

Celebrating the National Survey of Health and Development: 1946-2026

Read Now
ICE: Good People and Dirty Work
News
January 28, 2026

ICE: Good People and Dirty Work

Read Now
Why Your Next 2FA App Should Be an OTP Generator — and How to pick one that won’t let you down
News
January 24, 2026

Why Your Next 2FA App Should Be an OTP Generator — and How to pick one that won’t let you down

Read Now
After the University? Braiding a Path Forward

After the University? Braiding a Path Forward

Around the world, universities are in crisis. Some argue that we’re witnessing the slow collapse of the system as we’ve known it—whether […]

Read Now
Why is It So Difficult to Agree About Masks and Respiratory Infections?

Why is It So Difficult to Agree About Masks and Respiratory Infections?

The Northern Hemisphere is experiencing its regular seasonal increase in viral respiratory infections. Traditional schedules have not fully adjusted post-Covid so influenza […]

Read Now
Phantom for Your Browser: A Practical Guide to the Solana Wallet Extension

Phantom for Your Browser: A Practical Guide to the Solana Wallet Extension

I remember the first time I tried a Solana dApp through a browser extension — it felt slick and modern, but also […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments