Impact

Do Researchers Want to Engage with Practitioners?

August 5, 2019 1990

Background: In early 2018 I reached out to several practitioners’ listservs and invited them to share problems they were facing in their work in which they thought research might be helpful. In response I would match them with a social scientist one-on-one. I targeted listservs composed of non-partisan, non-profit organizations with a mission to remedy social ills. 37 practitioners responded over several months (see here for more details: www.r4impact.org/how-it-works).

This is the fifth of a series of short posts by Adam S. Levine spotlighting what the organization Research4Impact has learned about connecting social science researches with practitioners. Each post will be downloadable as a one-sheet PDF.

Main Finding: Here I use those experiences to help answer the question: Do researchers want to be engaged? Many have suggested otherwise. For instance, in his 2017 book Tom Nichols writes “[M]any experts, and particularly those in the academy, have abandoned their duty to engage with the public. They have retreated into jargon and irrelevance, preferring to interact with each other only.”

By and large I found the opposite. The large majority of researchers accepted my invitation to connect with practitioners. For the 31 matches that I arranged,2 I contacted a total of 37 researchers. Only six declined, with two saying the topic was not a great fit, two saying they were too busy at the moment, and two not responding.

In just over half of the cases I had previously met the researcher, whereas in the other cases the research4impact Board of Matchmakers suggested them to me. The main criterion in all cases was substantive expertise, as well as our subjective belief that the researcher would enjoy the conversation. As shown in the table, the large majority of researchers accepted my invitation regardless of whether I had personally met them, though those I had met were especially likely to say yes. This pattern underscores how personal networks are important for successful matchmaking (as they are with voluntarism more generally) but not absolutely necessary.

Proportion of researchers contacted who accepted invitation to connect with practitioners

Among everyone I contacted (N=37) 84%
Among those I had previously met (N=21) 95%
Among those I had not previously met (N=16) 695

For a PDF version of this post, please click HERE.

Check out www.r4impact.org/how-it-works for more on what we’re learning about researcher-practitioner relationships!


Previous post in series:

When Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers?

Do Practitioners Prefer to Connect with Researchers who are Local?

Do Practitioners Prefer Self or Hands-on Matchmaking?

When They Connect with Researchers, are Practitioners Time-Sensitive?

Do Researchers Share New Information or Just Tell Practitioners what they Already Know?

Adam Seth Levine is a professor of government at Cornell University. He is the "chief matchmaker" at research4impact, an organization he co-founded with Jake Bowers and Donald P. Green.

View all posts by Adam S. Levine

Related Articles

Outstanding Social and Behavioral Scientists Sought for Sage-CASBS Award
Recognition
October 20, 2025

Outstanding Social and Behavioral Scientists Sought for Sage-CASBS Award

Read Now
Share Your Most Surprising Policy Citation for Chance to Win $500 [Closed]
Announcements
October 17, 2025

Share Your Most Surprising Policy Citation for Chance to Win $500 [Closed]

Read Now
We See Economic Growth Differently Thanks to the 2025 Nobelists in Economics
Impact
October 14, 2025

We See Economic Growth Differently Thanks to the 2025 Nobelists in Economics

Read Now
Popular Paper Examines Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Analysis
Impact
July 10, 2025

Popular Paper Examines Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Analysis

Read Now
Examining How Open Research Affects Vulnerable Participants

Examining How Open Research Affects Vulnerable Participants

Open research has become a buzzword in university research, but Jo Hemlatha and Thomas Graves argue that when it comes to qualitative research, considerations around replicability, context-dependent methods and the sensitivity of data from marginalized people mean that openness takes many different forms.

Read Now
Valentin-Yves Mudimbe, 1941-2025: The Philosopher on the ‘Invention’ of Africa

Valentin-Yves Mudimbe, 1941-2025: The Philosopher on the ‘Invention’ of Africa

Congolese thinker, philosopher and linguist Valentin-Yves Mudimbe died on April 21, 2025 at the age of 83. He was in the US, […]

Read Now
Christopher Jencks, 1936-2025: An Innovative Voice on Inequality

Christopher Jencks, 1936-2025: An Innovative Voice on Inequality

Christopher Jencks, known for his novel and inventive opinions on hot topic issues like income inequality, homelessness, and racial gaps in standardized […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments