Social Science Bites

Jonathan Haskel on Intangibles

June 1, 2022 6243
Headshot of Jonathan Haskel
LISTEN TO JONATHAN HASKEL NOW! (Photo: Imperial College Business School)

The knowledge economy. Intellectual property. Software. Maybe even bitcoin. All pretty much intangible, and yet all clearly real and genuinely valuable. This is the realm where economist Jonathan Haskel of Imperial College London mints his own non-physical scholarship.

“In the old days,” relates the co-author of Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy, “the assets of companies, the sort of secret sauce by which companies would generate their incomes and do their services for which they’re employed for, was very tangible-based. These would be companies with lots of machines, these would be companies with oil tankers, with buildings, with vehicles to transport things around. Nowadays, companies like Google, like Microsoft, like LinkedIn, just look very different.”

And that difference, he explains to interviewer David Edmonds in this Social Science Bites podcast, is knowledge. “What they have is knowledge,” says Haskel, “and it’s knowledge assets, these intangible assets, which these companies are deploying.”

Intangible investments, as you might expect, have different properties than do tangible ones. Haskel dubbed them the four S’s:

  • Scale. Once you have a handle on a successful intangible, like software, that can generally scale up without more capital spending;
  • Sunk Costs. These are invested costs you can’t get back, such as the costs of developing software;
  • Spillovers. Aspects of your intangibles that others can copy or adopt for themselves; and
  • Synergies. “If you put all these intangibles together,” he explains, “you get more than the sum of the parts.”

Meanwhile, intangibles help keep modern economies humming – we think. “Accountants and statistical agencies are quite reluctant to measure intangibles because it’s — intangible. It’s a rather difficult thing to get at; these are often goods that aren’t traded from one person to another …”

Part of Haskel’s research effort is to quantify how much investment in intangibles is going on “behind the scenes,” which fits in with other interests of his such as re-engineering how gross domestic product gets measured. Businesses are now spending more on intangibles then on tangibles: Haskel’s work reveals that for every monetary unit companies spend on tangible assets, they spend 1.15 on intangible ones.

In addition to serving as a professor at the Imperial College Business School, Haskel is director of the Doctoral Programme at the Imperial. He is an elected member of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth and a research associate of the Centre for Economic Policy Research, the Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, and the IZA, Bonn.

Haskel has been a non-executive director of the UK Statistics Authority since 2016 and an external member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee since 2019.

To download an MP3 of this podcast, right-click HERE and save.

Join the debate and discuss this episode with fellow listeners on our Multytude conversation. Multytude is a new social media app that aims to make sense of the online conversation. With support from the SAGE Concept Grant, the Multytude team is working to create a new method of qualitative research for social scientists to better understand what people are saying about the big issues of today.


For a complete listing of past Social Science Bites podcasts, click HERE. You can follow Bites on Twitter @socialscibites and David Edmonds @DavidEdmonds100.

Welcome to the blog for the Social Science Bites podcast: a series of interviews with leading social scientists. Each episode explores an aspect of our social world. You can access all audio and the transcripts from each interview here. Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter @socialscibites.

View all posts by Social Science Bites

Related Articles

Alex Edmans on Market Irrationality
International Debate
October 1, 2026

Alex Edmans on Market Irrationality

Read Now
Quick Insight: Christina Bell on the Hidden Effects of Censorship
Insights
September 29, 2026

Quick Insight: Christina Bell on the Hidden Effects of Censorship

Read Now
Quick Insight: Carrie Hill on the Broader Effects of Censorship in Higher Education  
Insights
September 24, 2026

Quick Insight: Carrie Hill on the Broader Effects of Censorship in Higher Education  

Read Now
Quick Insight: Ken Porter on Developing Infrastructure for Impact-Driven Research
Insights
September 21, 2026

Quick Insight: Ken Porter on Developing Infrastructure for Impact-Driven Research

Read Now
Quick Insight: Dr. Nicole A. Cooke on Censorship, Diversity, and Democracy  

Quick Insight: Dr. Nicole A. Cooke on Censorship, Diversity, and Democracy  

Nicole A. Cooke, Augusta Baker Endowed Chair and professor at the School of Library and Information Science at the University of South […]

Read Now
East and Southeast Asians and the Definition of Britishness

East and Southeast Asians and the Definition of Britishness

The unfolding events of recent years have made one thing clear: we are steadily descending into a tangle of intercon­nected crises. Social […]

Read Now
‘Misinformation’ and the Control of Ebola

‘Misinformation’ and the Control of Ebola

The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is clearly proving very hard to control. Much of the difficulty must […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Mike Riddell

Why is there no mention of social capital as an intangible with wonderful regenerative properties? Someone needs to start counting it. Oh wait, they have: countercommunity.com