Business and Management INK

Funny or Functional: Customer Engagement in Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Services

July 22, 2024 605

In this article, Jenna Adriana Maeve Barrett, Elina Jaakkola, Jonas Heller, and Elizabeth Christine Brüggen reflect on the way that customers engage with certain brands and services. Their research article, “Customer Engagement in Utilitarian vs. Hedonic Service Contexts,” examines this topic and how different factors determine customer engagement. This article can be found in the Journal of Service Research.

Customers may share their love for brands online, line up for hours to experience a new ride in an amusement park, and may excitedly tell their friends about the awesome new series they binged. All these actions are forms of customer engagement – an important and well-established concept in marketing and service research, encompassing the cognitive, affective, and behavioral investments customers make in their interactions with brands or service providers.

However, there are other services relevant to society that struggle to engage their customers, for example pension services. Through our many collaborative projects with the retirement industry, we have noticed that a lack of customer engagement is a major challenge. Indeed, there is research that shows that most consumers would rather vacuum clean than plan for their retirement. This is a problem as lack of engagement with retirement planning may compromise consumers’ financial wellbeing in the future.

To solve these challenges, we turned to the customer engagement literature to find evidence-based solutions to increase customer engagement. While reviewing the literature, it became apparent that this rich and diverse literature stream did not provide direct insight into the problem we were trying to solve. Service research on customer engagement is primarily preoccupied with brands and pleasure-driven services — such as theme parks where engagement is virtually assured — offered limited guidance.  This research was motivated by the realization that the assumptions held about what drives customer engagement did not seem to apply to settings such as retirement planning.

We wondered why is it that customers are so engaged with some brands and services, whereas they neglect others. Our research started by comparing retirement planning to other engagement contexts, but soon we realized that the challenge is not unique to retirement planning. Conventional understanding of customer engagement often revolves around the notion that customers engage with brands or services for enjoyment and positive emotional experiences. Yet, for practical services like utilities or financial planning, where outcomes take precedence over pleasure, this may not hold true. Customers usually choose services like car washes or dental check-ups for their practical benefits, not for pleasure or enjoyment. This research bridges the gap between assumptions about customer engagement and the distinct features of utilitarian and hedonic service contexts. By analyzing fundamental features that distinguish hedonic vs utilitarian services—such as affectivity, motivational focus, perception of necessity, role of risk, and relational focus—we develop propositions that shed light on how these features influence customer drivers, firm drivers, and outcomes of customer engagement.

We believe that the customer engagement literature can be meaningfully expanded by studying how features of the service context contribute to the drivers and outcomes of engagement, both for firms as well as for customers. Whereas the customer engagement literature is already maturing, our study shows that there is tremendous growth potential left. We hope that our article stimulates new research that disentangles how features of the service context affect customer engagement.

Jenna Barrett (pictured) is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Marketing at the Tilburg School of Economics and Management at Tilburg University. Jenna has research interests in financial well-being and consumer financial decision making and the intersection of psychology, marketing, finance and behavioral economics. She is also an assistant professor at Tilburg University. Elina Jaakkola is a professor of marketing in the Turku School of Economics at the University of Turku, Finland. She has areas of expertise in service business, customer/actor engagement, customer experience, value creation, B2B marketing, and service innovation. She is also an associate editor for the Journal of Service Research and Industrial Marketing Management. Jonas Heller is an assistant professor in the Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management at the Maastricht University School of Business and Economics. He has research interests in merging technologies (Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality) in retailing environments, the impact of AR/VR on consumer decision making, retailers’ ROI, and how emerging technologies can contribute to consumer well-being (e.g. healthy eating, pension engagement). Jonas has a PhD in digital marketing from the University of New South Wales in Australia and is the co-founder and scientific director of the DEXLab. Elisabeth Brüggen is a professor of financial services in the School of Business and Economics at Maastricht University. As a researcher, Elisabeth seeks to generate rigorous evidence-based insights on how to accelerate people's long-term financial planning. She has teaching experience at the bachelor, master, and MBA levels.

View all posts by Jenna Barrett, Elina Jaakkola, Jonas Heller, and Elisabeth Bruggen

Related Articles

The End of Meaningful CSR?
Business and Management INK
November 22, 2024

The End of Meaningful CSR?

Read Now
Boards and Internationalization Speed
Business and Management INK
November 18, 2024

Boards and Internationalization Speed

Read Now
How Managers Can Enhance Trust
Business and Management INK
November 11, 2024

How Managers Can Enhance Trust

Read Now
The Role of Place in Sustainability
Business and Management INK
October 28, 2024

The Role of Place in Sustainability

Read Now
Turning to Glitter in Management Studies – Why We Should Take ‘Unserious’ Glitter Serious to Understand New Management Practices

Turning to Glitter in Management Studies – Why We Should Take ‘Unserious’ Glitter Serious to Understand New Management Practices

In this article, author Jette Sandager reflects on the inspiration behind her research article, “The sensuous governmentality of glitter: Educating managing women scientists […]

Read Now
Utilizing Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Societal Impact

Utilizing Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Societal Impact

In this article, co-authors Natalie Slawinski, Bruna Brito, Jennifer Brenton, and Wendy Smith reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Reflections on deep academic–practitioner partnering for generative societal impact,” published in Strategic Organization.

Read Now
Trippin’ Forward: Management Research and the Development of Psychedelics

Trippin’ Forward: Management Research and the Development of Psychedelics

Charlie Smith reflects on his interest in psychedelic research, the topic of his research article, “Psychedelics, Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy and Employees’ Wellbeing,” published in Journal of Management Inquiry.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments