Bookshelf

Report: Latest Academic Freedom Index Sees Global Declines

June 28, 2023 2103

Academic freedom has seen a general decline across world regions and regime types, challenging scholars to express their ideas and findings freely. This is the key takeaway from the latest update of the Fredrich-Alexander-Universität Institute for Political Science‘s Academic Freedom Index.

The AFI is a tool used to assess the de facto status of academic freedom across various countries and territories worldwide. The fourth version of the index, released last month, includes data for 179 countries and territories, up from the 175 in the previous edition.

Cover of the 2023 Academic Freedom Index showing disembodied scholars pointing at world map
Read or download the report here

The new report found 4 billion people, over 50 percent of the world’s population, face reduced academic freedom in 2022. The index also determined 22 countries and territories offer fewer academic freedoms than they did a decade ago. In 152 other countries, academic freedom has stagnated at a low level.

Academic freedom has only improved in five countries, which together represent 0.7 percent of the world’s population: The Gambia, Uzbekistan, Seychelles, Montenegro and Kazakhstan. On the other hand, countries with large populations like China, India, the United States and Mexico have backslid. While the country’s political settings vary, all have experienced declines in academic freedom, with the changes in India and China alone impacting 2.8 billion people.

The report found declines seem to be occurring worldwide in various political contexts. For instance, reduced academic freedom in Eastern Europe and Central Asia can be attributed to increasing autocracy, and in liberal democracies the United States of America and the United Kingdom, downturns also occur.

The report offered a deeper dive into the U.S. decline:

After a long period of relatively high academic freedom levels, four out of five indicators visibly declined in 2021 – the year after President Donald Trump, who repeatedly made statements highly critical of science and academia, was voted out of office. Although some federal actions detrimental to academic freedom were taken during his administration, educational matters in the USA are largely regulated by individual states, which have increasingly used their authority to interfere in academic affairs since 2021. At least nine states, all Republican-led, have adopted bills that ban the teaching of concepts related to “critical race theory” in higher education institutions. Several states are also targeting tenure in public universities, adding to the already precarious status of academic employment. Some states now also allow students to record class lectures without the professor’s consent. Furthermore, influential conservative groups are lobbying state legislatures to withdraw funding from scientific fields such as gender, minority studies, and environmental science, and various groups are maintaining public “watchlists” of professors perceived as radical leftists. Despite efforts to polarize and intimidate, AFI data on academics’ freedom of expression indicates that scholars in the USA remain able to publically voice their expertise, even on politically salient issues.

The updated index was informed by data collected from 1900 until December 2022, expertise from more than 2,000 scholars and standardized questionnaires. To measure a nation’s overall degree of academic freedom, the index considers several factors.

“The Academic Freedom Index rests on five key indicators: the freedom to research and teach; the freedom of academic exchange and dissemination; the institutional autonomy of universities; campus integrity; and the freedom of academic and cultural expression,” the report reads. “Through those five indicators, the AFI captures elements of academic freedom that are a) comparable across different university systems across the world and b) specific to the academic sector.”

To generate the index, the V-Dem Institute uses a Bayesian measurement model that turns data from experts into indicators and index values. Version 13 of the measurement model, which was used to create the newest index, included increased historical coverage for 16 countries, added more contributing coders and revised the dataset on constitutional guarantees of academic freedom.

Emma Richards is a student at the University of Florida studying public relations. She is the social science communications intern at Sage Publishing.

View all posts by Emma Richards

Related Articles

Biden Administration Releases ‘Blueprint’ For Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy
News
May 17, 2024

Biden Administration Releases ‘Blueprint’ For Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Read Now
Celebrating 20 Years of an Afrocentric Small Scholarly Press
Communication
May 7, 2024

Celebrating 20 Years of an Afrocentric Small Scholarly Press

Read Now
Third Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Can We Overcome Sexism in AI?
Bookshelf
April 29, 2024

Third Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Can We Overcome Sexism in AI?

Read Now
The Long Arm of Criminality
Opinion
April 29, 2024

The Long Arm of Criminality

Read Now
Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

The second issue of The Evidence explores the intersection of gender inequality and the global climate crisis. Author Josephine Lethbridge recounts the […]

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Makes an Outsized Impact on Policy

Why Social Science? Because It Makes an Outsized Impact on Policy

Euan Adie, founder of Altmetric and Overton and currently Overton’s managing director, answers questions about the outsized impact that SBS makes on policy and his work creating tools to connect the scholarly and policy worlds.

Read Now
The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting

The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting

Based on a study of how research is cited in national and local media sources, Andy Tattersall shows how research is often poorly represented in the media and suggests better community standards around linking to original research could improve trust in mainstream media.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments