Business and Management INK

Management Studies that Break Your Heart

July 27, 2010 947

 Today, Gail Whiteman discusses her recent article, Management Studies that Break your Heart, in Journal of Management Inquiry.

  • Who is the target audience for this article?

There are two target audiences for this article: management scholars and the people that we study. 

  • What Inspired You To Be Interested In This Topic?

My own personal experiences inspired me to write this article.

  • Were There Findings That Were Surprising To You?

Yes.  By taking my own emotional responses to research seriously as analytic signals, I was able to critically assess some of the hidden gender issues inherent in stakeholder theory, and also to identify boundary conditions of overly sanitized, neutral theoretical language.  By refusing to continue to hide my own emotional reactions to my academic work, I was able to enrich my analysis and also achieve greater authenticity in my self-perceptions of my work.

  • How Do You See This Study Influencing Future Research And/Or Practice?

I hope that this article will encourage other management scholars to come out of the “emotional” closet and disclose more about their own emotional reactions to research.

  • How Does This Study Fit Into Your Body Of Work/Line Of Research?

This article was one of the bravest things I ever wrote because it was so close to my heart that I felt vulnerable.  At the same time, I see this article as the natural maturation of an entire body of research that I have conducted on corporate social responsibility and sustainability.

  • How Did Your Paper Change During The Review Process?

The review process encourages more self-reflection and the use of concrete examples to make my point.  The suggestions by reviewers definitely improved the process and also gave me the courage to delve deeper into this issue.

  • What, If Anything, Would You Do Differently If You Could Go Back And Do This Study Again?

If I wrote this article again, I would write even more vulnerably with greater self-disclosure.

Bookmark and Share

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

How AI-Integration is Changing the Workplace
Business and Management INK
May 28, 2024

How AI-Integration is Changing the Workplace

Read Now
Keeping Qualitative Research Weird!
Business and Management INK
May 23, 2024

Keeping Qualitative Research Weird!

Read Now
Sometimes, We Do Need a Narcissist
Business and Management INK
May 21, 2024

Sometimes, We Do Need a Narcissist

Read Now
From Collision to Collaboration: Bridging University and Industry Relationships
Business and Management INK
May 17, 2024

From Collision to Collaboration: Bridging University and Industry Relationships

Read Now
Motivation of Young Project Professionals: Their Needs for Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Purpose

Motivation of Young Project Professionals: Their Needs for Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Purpose

Young professionals born between the early 1980s and mid-1990s now constitute a majority of the project management workforce. Having grown up connected, collaborative, and mobile, they have specific motivations and needs, which are explored in this study.

Read Now
A Complexity Framework for Project Management Strategies

A Complexity Framework for Project Management Strategies

Contemporary projects frequently pose complexities that cannot be adequately tackled by the classical project management tradition. This article offers a diagnostic tool to help identify the type of complexity of a project and determine the most suitable strategy for addressing it.

Read Now
Bringing Theories into Conversation to Strategize for a Better World

Bringing Theories into Conversation to Strategize for a Better World

In this article, Ann Langley, Rikkie Albertsen, Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari, Katrin Heucher, Marc Krautzberger, Pauline Reinecke, Natalie Slawinski, and Eero Vaara reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Strategizing Together for a Better World: Institutional, Paradox and Practice Theories in Conversation,” found in the Journal of Management Inquiry.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments