Academic Funding

When did the Big Society turn into Big Brother?

March 29, 2011 1509

A column by Tom Sutcliffe in today’s Independent addresses the question of academic freedom posed by reports that the Arts and Humanities Research Council will require academics seeking research funds to study the Big Society as a priority.

The AHRC denies that it has been subject to government pressure, and insists that it remains independent. But academics are concerned about the control of research and the perceived threat to intellectual freedom. Tom Sutcliffe suggests it’s the next step on from impact statements, which he describes as “a witless and time-wasting obligation introduced by a Labour government”.

What’s your view: is academic freedom really under threat here? Will pressure (whether explicit or implicit) to study a government priority distort the research agenda? And does anyone want to study the Big Society?

Related Articles

Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase
Infrastructure
April 17, 2025

Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase

Read Now
The Academy and the Authoritarian: Stories from the 20th Century
International Debate
April 14, 2025

The Academy and the Authoritarian: Stories from the 20th Century

Read Now
How Can You Serve the Globe’s People If You Don’t Know How Many There Are?
International Debate
April 10, 2025

How Can You Serve the Globe’s People If You Don’t Know How Many There Are?

Read Now
The End of the Free Trade Era?
Bookshelf
April 8, 2025

The End of the Free Trade Era?

Read Now
Migrant Deaths Along the US-Mexico Border: Causes, Counts, and What the Future May Hold

Migrant Deaths Along the US-Mexico Border: Causes, Counts, and What the Future May Hold

The Accounting for Migrant Deaths Working Group has a simple but ambitious goal – to ensure an accurate count of migrant deaths […]

Read Now
Long-Term Impact Requires Archiving Research Communication

Long-Term Impact Requires Archiving Research Communication

In recent years there has been an increased focus on how research papers and supplemental data can be preserved openly. Andy Tattersall, Liz Such, Joe Langley and Fiona Marshall argue equal attention should also be paid to curating communication outputs aimed at engaging non-academic audiences.

Read Now
Does Trump’s ‘Common Sense’ Equal a War on Social Science?

Does Trump’s ‘Common Sense’ Equal a War on Social Science?

Donald Trump’s executive actions have to a surprising extent focused on education and knowledge production. Philip N. Cohen argues beyond their short-term implications, these measures represent a concerted effort to undermine scientific enquiry across all fields of research.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments