Business and Management INK

What Do Resource and Capability-Based Theories Propose?

August 11, 2011 744

Michael J. Leiblein, Ohio State University, published “What Do Resource- and Capability-Based Theories Propose?” in the July 2011 issue of the Journal of Management as a guest editorial. It was the most-frequently read article of July 2011 for the Journal of Management, based on calculations from Highwire-hosted articles. Most-read rankings are recalculated at the beginning of the month and are based on full-text and pdf views. Mr. Leiblein kindly provided the following thoughts on his editorial.

“While resource- and capability-based theories have garnered  a great deal of attention in management research, my experience as a referee and journal editor suggested that confusion remained regarding the core predictions offered by these perspectives.  The intent of this editorial was to engage the broad audience of Journal of Management readers in a discussion regarding the primary assumptions, insights, and logic put forth by resource- and capability-based theories.”

“In writing the editorial, my hope was to influence future research by fostering greater precision in discussions of the central constructs and the development of unambiguous, measurable, and refutable propositions that support more careful tests of these theories.  I also hope the paper aids practice by helping managers to think more deeply about the implications of resource- and capability-based research.  While the importance of competitive heterogeneity to the pursuit of economic growth and competitive advantage  has led strategy scholars to devote a great deal of attention to understanding how resources, resource allocation policies, and organizational decisions affect business firm’s ability to create and capture value, these insights are often misunderstood and frequently over-simplified in practice.”

“I enjoyed writing this editorial as it provided me an opportunity to review and publish some ideas that I have thought about for a number of years.  While my prior research regarding how firms organize to create advantage in complex and dynamic environments considers these perspectives, my prior work has not emphasized these theories.  This editorial allowed me to focus more tightly on the insights provided by these literatures and to suggest how future research may further contribute to this line of thought.”

Bookmark and Share

[polldaddy rating=”4667602″]

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

Keeping Qualitative Research Weird!
Business and Management INK
May 23, 2024

Keeping Qualitative Research Weird!

Read Now
Sometimes, We Do Need a Narcissist
Business and Management INK
May 21, 2024

Sometimes, We Do Need a Narcissist

Read Now
From Collision to Collaboration: Bridging University and Industry Relationships
Business and Management INK
May 17, 2024

From Collision to Collaboration: Bridging University and Industry Relationships

Read Now
Motivation of Young Project Professionals: Their Needs for Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Purpose
Business and Management INK
May 14, 2024

Motivation of Young Project Professionals: Their Needs for Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Purpose

Read Now
A Complexity Framework for Project Management Strategies

A Complexity Framework for Project Management Strategies

Contemporary projects frequently pose complexities that cannot be adequately tackled by the classical project management tradition. This article offers a diagnostic tool to help identify the type of complexity of a project and determine the most suitable strategy for addressing it.

Read Now
Bringing Theories into Conversation to Strategize for a Better World

Bringing Theories into Conversation to Strategize for a Better World

In this article, Ann Langley, Rikkie Albertsen, Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari, Katrin Heucher, Marc Krautzberger, Pauline Reinecke, Natalie Slawinski, and Eero Vaara reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Strategizing Together for a Better World: Institutional, Paradox and Practice Theories in Conversation,” found in the Journal of Management Inquiry.

Read Now
Exploring Discrimination Faced by Asian Nationals in the U.S. Labor Market

Exploring Discrimination Faced by Asian Nationals in the U.S. Labor Market

Amit Kramer, Kwon Hee Han, Yun Kyoung Kim, and Yun Kyoung Kim reflect on the hypotheses and observations that led to their article, “Inefficiencies and bias in first job placement: the case of professional Asian nationals in the United States.”

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments