Cutting NSF Is Like Liquidating Your Finest Investment
Look closely at your mobile phone or tablet. Touch-screen technology, speech recognition, digital sound recording and the internet were all developed using […]
Credit Crunch: Housing Bubbles, Globalisation and the Worldwide Economic Crisis. Graham Turner; London: Pluto Press, 2008. 256 pp., $27.95 Paperback. No Way […]
Why do some terrorist organizations adopt suicide bombing as a tactic? Journal of Conflict Resolution Public views on the ‘self-sexualization’ of Miley Cyrus From […]
The “US effect”: problems with social science research in America Boston. Tech companies turn to social science The Missoulian Boys whose fathers […]
We are pleased to congratulate John K. Kruschke of the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Indiana University and Herman Aguinis […]
Are you looking for cutting-edge, peer-reviewed research on organizational studies? Take a look at the top five articles currently being read in […]
A recent New York Times op-ed has provoked a great deal of debate over the relevance and reinvigoration of the social sciences. Alex Golub welcomes some of the criticism levied at the social sciences as a whole but finds the lack of evidence supporting many of the sweeping claims on why social science is stagnating to be unreconcilable given massive funding differentials and the history of social and natural sciences. But social scientists must continue to work to ensure mainstream social science is communicated in more accessible ways.
Editor’s note: We are pleased to welcome Claartje J. Vinkenburg of VU University in Amsterdam. Her paper “Arena: A Critical Conceptual Framework […]
We are pleased to highlight the 2013 Journal of Management Best Paper and Scholarly Impact Award winners! The Scholarly Impact Award, given […]