Interdisciplinarity

Making Interdisciplinarity the Norm Interdisciplinarity
Ziyad Marar

Making Interdisciplinarity the Norm

January 5, 2016 997

Ziyad Marar

Ziyad Marar

“[T]he bulk of the social sciences,” writes Ziyad Marar, examining how successfully these disciplines have been at repelling those who would cross their academic borders, “have proved peculiarly resistant despite how suitable their problem domains are to multi-level inquiry.” So far, well –if sadly –understood. “The good news,” he adds, “is we are seeing substantial shifts in this terrain that could last, triggered in part by the rise of big data and new technology.”

Marar, the global publishing director for Social Science Space’s parent, SAGE Publishing, discusses the bright-ish future of interdisciplinary social research as his contribution to the annual questioned posed by the Edge.org website.

Every year Edge.org — with its lengthy tagline of “To arrive at the edge of the world’s knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves” – poses a specific question and then invites those sophisticated minds to answer in essay form. This year’s question was “What do you consider the most interesting recent [scientific] news? What makes it important?”

All told, 197 people responded to that inquiry, and their answers can be found here. The list includes a number of public intellectuals well known to Social Science Space readers, such as Stephen Pinker, Stephen Kosslyn, Jonathan Haidt or Margaret Levi, director of our partner Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, who examines advances made in “Big Data And Better Government.”

For his part, Marar focused on the promise of cross pollination in the social and behavioral sciences, something he points approvingly toward in other fields but, apart from say economics, is more absent than present in the social sciences. He alse points approvingly toward centers and initiatives that are de-siloing social science, such as D Base at the University of California at Berkeley, the Institute for Quantitative Social Science at Harvard, or the Wellcome Trust’s Hub Award, which is aimed at fostering efforts that explore “what happens when medicine and health intersect with the arts, humanities and social sciences.”

Without offering too much of a spoiler, Marar says interdisciplinarity should become the norm, notwithstanding the need for specialized endeavor to continue to provide the building blocks for outstanding synthetic work. To read his full essay, click here.


Related Articles

Civilisation – and Some Discontents
Public Engagement
April 30, 2024

Civilisation – and Some Discontents

Read Now
Exploring ‘Lost Person Behavior’ and the Science of Search and Rescue
Featured
April 24, 2024

Exploring ‘Lost Person Behavior’ and the Science of Search and Rescue

Read Now
Philip Rubin: FABBS’ Accidental Essential Man Linking Research and Policy
Insights
December 12, 2023

Philip Rubin: FABBS’ Accidental Essential Man Linking Research and Policy

Read Now
How Intelligent is Artificial Intelligence?
Public Policy
September 27, 2023

How Intelligent is Artificial Intelligence?

Read Now
National Academies’s Committee On Law And Justice Seeks Experts

National Academies’s Committee On Law And Justice Seeks Experts

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine is seeking suggestions for experts interested in its Committee on Law and Justice (CLAJ) […]

Read Now
Musical Ways of Knowing

Musical Ways of Knowing

Our long-time blogger David Canter considers what he has learned while completing his PhD in music composition. He spent a lifetime as a social scientist, requiring every argument to be bolstered by some form of empirical evidence, or at least a supportive citation from the works of others. The contrast of developing an approach to composing music that can be regarded as ‘a contribution to knowledge’, has made him aware that there are many ways of knowing which scientists, especially social scientists and psychologists, ignore at their peril.

Read Now
True Crime: Insight Into The Human Fascination With The Who-Done-It

True Crime: Insight Into The Human Fascination With The Who-Done-It

Half of Americans say they enjoy true crime — stories portraying real-life instances of murder, kidnapping and other shocking crimes — and 35 percent say they consume true crime content at least once a week. Why are people, especially women, so fascinated with the genre, and how does interest in the who-done-it affect consumers’ thoughts and behaviors

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments