Communication

Archived Webinar: Fostering a Scientifically Informed Populace

October 3, 2016 1799

How do we decide whether to vaccinate our children? Or eat genetically engineered foods? Accept human causes of climate change? Determine whether to take narcotics for pain? Know whether nuclear energy is safe? Democracies depend on educated citizens who can make informed decisions about important scientific topics relevant to their own lives and others’. The vast scientific information available in our digital society can be complex, confusing, and often conflicting – and leads to one meta-question: how do we foster public understanding of science?

Two scholars who investigate how the public learns about science and then chooses to trust it (or not) address that question in this hour-long webinar sponsored by the journal Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences and its parent organization, the Federation of Associations in Behavioral & Brain Sciences (FABBS). The scholars, Barbara K. Hofer and Gale M. Sinatra, co-wrote an article — “Public Understanding of Science: Policy and Educational Implications” — that appears in the current issue of Policy Insights. In that article, and in this webinar, the pair not only discuss some of the more widely bemoaned instances of public mis-understanding of science, but they discuss ways to create ‘instructional scaffolds’ to combat this threat to informed policy choices.

Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer

Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer

Sinatra is the associate dean for research and professor of education and psychology at the Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern California. She is the past editor of the journal, Educational Psychologist and former Vice President of AERA’s Division C, Learning and Instruction. She is a fellow of American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and the Society for Text and Discourse. She heads the Motivated Change Research Lab, which aims to understand the cognitive, motivational, and emotional processes that lead to attitude change, conceptual change, and successful STEM learning.

Hofer is a professor of psychology at Middlebury College in the areas of developmental, educational, and cultural psychology, and is a fellow of the American Psychological Association. She received of national awards for both teaching and research, receiving the Review of Research Award from the American Educational Research Association (with Paul Pintrich) and the McKeachie Early Career Teaching Award from the American Psychological Association. In addition to publishing several dozen articles and book chapters, she co-edited the book Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing.


Related Articles

Webinar – Trust in Science: Understanding the Trends and Implications for Science Communication
Event
May 20, 2024

Webinar – Trust in Science: Understanding the Trends and Implications for Science Communication

Read Now
Celebrating 20 Years of an Afrocentric Small Scholarly Press
Communication
May 7, 2024

Celebrating 20 Years of an Afrocentric Small Scholarly Press

Read Now
Striving for Linguistic Diversity in Scientific Research
Communication
May 1, 2024

Striving for Linguistic Diversity in Scientific Research

Read Now
Third Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Can We Overcome Sexism in AI?
Bookshelf
April 29, 2024

Third Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Can We Overcome Sexism in AI?

Read Now
Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

Second Edition of ‘The Evidence’ Examines Women and Climate Change

The second issue of The Evidence explores the intersection of gender inequality and the global climate crisis. Author Josephine Lethbridge recounts the […]

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

The processes of mainstreaming and normalization of far-right politics have much to do with the mainstream itself, if not more than with the far right.

Read Now
The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

Retractions are generally framed as a negative: as science not working properly, as an embarrassment for the institutions involved, or as a flaw in the peer review process. They can be all those things. But they can also be part of a story of science working the right way: finding and correcting errors, and publicly acknowledging when information turns out to be incorrect.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments