Research

Archived Webinar: Understanding America’s Rural-Urban Interface Research
From top left clockwise: Dan Lichter, Shannon Monnat, Mark Partridge and James Ziliak

Archived Webinar: Understanding America’s Rural-Urban Interface

December 11, 2017 1700

America’s rural-urban divide, it seems, has never been greater, a point reinforced by large geographic disparities in support for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. But it is also the case that big cities and rural communities are more tightly integrated than ever and are increasingly interdependent, both economically and socially. That was the starting point for a recent webinar which was recorded and which appears below.

Lichter.Monnat.Partridge.Ziliak

From top left clockwise: Dan Lichter, Shannon Monnat, Mark Partridge and James Ziliak

The November 29 webinar, drawn from the focus of the July issue of The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, featured the two guest editors of that special issue, Dan Lichter and James Ziliak. Lichter is Ferris Family Professor in the Department of Policy Analysis and Management, professor of sociology, and director of the Institute for the Social Sciences, all at Cornell University., while Ziliak is the Gatton Chair in Microeconomics, director of the Center for Poverty Research, and executive director of the Kentucky Federal Statistical Research Data Center, all at the University of Kentucky

They were joined by Shannon Monnat, the Lerner Chair for Public Health Promotion and senior research associate at the Center for Policy Research at Syracuse University,  and Mark Partridge, the C. William Swank Chair of Rural-Urban Policy at The Ohio State University and a professor in the Agricultural, Environment, and Development Economics Department.

Each gave a talk based on their research – providing an overview of the divide and the bridges as well as the economic, labor force and social welfare implications of the nexus — before joining in for a short question-and-answer session with the webinar audience.

The panelists didn’t get to all the questions asked, and some of those not addressed during the hour-long broadcast are answered below.

Because those in rural areas have similar socio-economic trends as racial minorities in metro areas, should scholars think about rural individuals, or at least Appalachians, as a possible protected class?

JAMES ZILIAK: The fact that they share similar socio-economic trends of lower employment and stagnant income highlights the fact that economic opportunities facing inner city residents and rural residents are more similar than different. This suggests that investments for education–pre-K, K-12, higher ed–require a more substantive federal role to increase economic opportunity, and that these opportunities need to be directed towards those most in need.

This is especially true for higher ed, where the emphasis at too many schools remains on merit-based aid rather than need-based aid, thus further exacerbating the mechanisms of inequality shared by urban and rural peoples who lack the means to fund higher ed. It also suggests that economic development initiatives also require a more directed federal effort towards rural residents. Some of this began in the latter days of the Obama administration where the first rural Promise Zones were established, but much more is needed to enhance job opportunities for rural communities hard hit in recent decades by strong global economic forces.

How do some of the tax proposals currently making the rounds sharpen or soften the divide? If you could insert a proposal in the mix, what might it entail?

JAMES ZILIAK: The current tax proposals passed this past week in the House and Senate both will exacerbate economic inequality, and likely widen the rural/urban divide. This is because most of the tax cuts that persist over time go towards those with higher incomes, and corporations, whose major operations tend to be located in urban areas.

If Congress wanted to redesign taxes to be more amenable to rural residents, it would include converting the Child and Dependent Care Tax from nonrefundable to a refundable credit so that working families with dependent children could get relief from high child care costs, they would expand the EITC for childless workers and those with one qualifying child, and they would introduce tax relief for commuting costs as transportation costs rank as the second largest component after housing in the typical consumer’s budget and rural residents often face very long commutes to work.


Related Articles

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment
Insights
June 14, 2024

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

Read Now
How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves
Ethics
June 4, 2024

How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves

Read Now
Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks
Research
May 21, 2024

Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Read Now
Analyzing the Impact: Social Media and Mental Health 
Research
May 15, 2024

Analyzing the Impact: Social Media and Mental Health 

Read Now
New Fellowship for Community-Led Development Research of Latin America and the Caribbean Now Open

New Fellowship for Community-Led Development Research of Latin America and the Caribbean Now Open

Thanks to a collaboration between the Inter-American Foundation (IAF) and the Social Science Research Council (SSRC), applications are now being accepted for […]

Read Now
New Opportunity to Support Government Evaluation of Public Participation and Community Engagement Now Open

New Opportunity to Support Government Evaluation of Public Participation and Community Engagement Now Open

The President’s Management Agenda Learning Agenda: Public Participation & Community Engagement Evidence Challenge is dedicated to forming a strategic, evidence-based plan that federal agencies and external researchers can use to solve big problems.

Read Now
Three Decades of Rural Health Research and a Bumper Crop of Insights from South Africa

Three Decades of Rural Health Research and a Bumper Crop of Insights from South Africa

A longitudinal research project project covering 31 villages in rural South Africa has led to groundbreaking research in many fields, including genomics, HIV/Aids, cardiovascular conditions and stroke, cognition and aging.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments