Tips

How Should I Approach Reviewing an Article?

September 11, 2018 1330

Author Gateway Banner

Katrina Newitt

Katrina Newitt is senior peer review manager in the SAGE Journal STM Editorial team

The theme of this year’s Peer Review Week is diversity and inclusion; ensuring access to training and appropriate resources for early career researchers from different backgrounds and countries is essential to broadening reviewer pools and diversifying peer review communities.

Earlier in the year, I attended a reviewer workshop hosted by Sense about Science, where one of the attendees commented that they had no concept of what they were supposed to do the first time they were asked to complete a peer review. This should come as no surprise – most early career researchers receive little to no training on how to peer review, and it’s not always easy to find consistent or helpful guidance.

After all, it’s quite the responsibility – your comments may form the basis of an editor’s decision on whether or not to publish a paper. Whatever the outcome, your review should be specific and constructive enough to help the authors with any revisions needed to improve their research. Consider what type of comments and feedback have been useful for you when improving or refining your own work, and adopt this style when approaching your peer review.

Different journals have different criteria for the type of content that they need, so be sure to check for any specific instructions on the journal website or in the emails inviting you to review. If in doubt, ask the editor or the editorial office for guidance. In the meantime, here are some tips to get you started:

Read the whole paper through to get an overall impression of its quality and suitability for the journal and then consider:

  • Does the abstract help you to understand the aims, key data and conclusions of the paper?
  • Are the methods rigorous and replicable?
  • Are the results clear and does any discussion put these into context?
  • Are there any major flaws, i.e., factual errors?
  • Have you spotted anything which might indicate a potential ethics issue?

If you’d like to find out more, SAGE recently published a guide for new or inexperienced reviewers, which we designed to cover the basics of peer review as well as to provide advice on how to evaluate the different sections of the paper, how to structure feedback and where to look for ethical problems. Please let us know if this guide is useful, and if there are any other areas you’d like us to cover in the future. And good luck!


Katrina Newitt is senior peer review manager in the SAGE Journal STM Editorial team

View all posts by Katrina Newitt

Related Articles

Where Did We Get the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?
Communication
August 14, 2024

Where Did We Get the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?

Read Now
Felice Levine to Leave AERA in 2025
Announcements
June 25, 2024

Felice Levine to Leave AERA in 2025

Read Now
Karine Morin Takes Helm of Canada’s Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Announcements
June 20, 2024

Karine Morin Takes Helm of Canada’s Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences

Read Now
2024 Holberg Prize Goes to Political Theorist Achille Mbembe
News
March 14, 2024

2024 Holberg Prize Goes to Political Theorist Achille Mbembe

Read Now
Edward Webster, 1942-2024: South Africa’s Pioneering Industrial Sociologist

Edward Webster, 1942-2024: South Africa’s Pioneering Industrial Sociologist

Eddie Webster, sociologist and emeritus professor at the Southern Centre for Inequality Studies at the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa, died on March 5, 2024, at age 82.

Read Now
Charles V. Hamilton, 1929-2023: The Philosopher Behind ‘Black Power’

Charles V. Hamilton, 1929-2023: The Philosopher Behind ‘Black Power’

Political scientist Charles V. Hamilton, the tokenizer of the term ‘institutional racism,’ an apostle of the Black Power movement, and at times deemed both too radical and too deferential in how to fight for racial equity, died on November 18, 2023. He was 94.

Read Now
Norman B. Anderson, 1955-2024: Pioneering Psychologist and First Director of OBSSR

Norman B. Anderson, 1955-2024: Pioneering Psychologist and First Director of OBSSR

Norman B. Anderson, a clinical psychologist whose work as both a researcher and an administrator saw him serve as the inaugural director of the U.S. National Institute of Health’s Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research and as chief executive officer of the American Psychological Association, died on March 1.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments