Insights

Watch the Video: What’s Next for #AcademicTwitter?

November 17, 2022 2065

Elon Musk’s recent purchase of Twitter has raised alarms about the spread of misinformation, hate speech and a lack of moderation, causing some academics to depart from the platform.

In a video interview hosted by Social Science Space’s sister site Methodspace, Stu Shulman, a social media researcher and the founder and CEO of Textifter, joined interviewer Janet Salmons to discuss the future of academic Twitter.

Shulman’s research predates Musk’s purchase of Twitter and has raised various concerns about security.

“It’s the voluminous amounts of hate I see in my own research. Also the systemic weaponization of Twitter against democratic systems of government globally,” he said. “Evolving tactics use Twitter trains (tagging 30 like-minded users), notification-rich replies, the ReTweet functionality, gamification, domestic and foreign meme warfare, the idolatry of influence via misinformation, bots and trolls, as well as paid amplifiers of all manner and variety.”

Throughout the interview, Shulman and Salmons discussed the political turmoil which has occurred on Twitter, including election denial, vaccine misinformation and other international conspiracies.

Shulman raised the possibility that misinformation, hate and other threats will become more prevalent in the future.

“What I’m worried about for the future is if it becomes easier rather than harder to do the things that didn’t work but they almost did in 2020,” he said.

He cited the utility of Twitter for academic analysis in various disciplines, and expressed concern that academic use of Twitter will be threatened by a lack of moderation.

“The reason so many academics study Twitter data is because of its availability and because of its format and its structure,” he said. “It’s easy to get data and that’s what drew the computer scientists to it early on and social scientists to it later. It made it amenable to capture and amenable to research.”

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive
Communication
July 15, 2024

Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive

Read Now
Uncovering ‘Sneaked References’ in an Article’s Metadata
Communication
July 11, 2024

Uncovering ‘Sneaked References’ in an Article’s Metadata

Read Now
Reflections of a Former Student Body President: ‘Student Government is a Thankless Job’
Insights
July 1, 2024

Reflections of a Former Student Body President: ‘Student Government is a Thankless Job’

Read Now
Fifth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Do Peacebuilding Practices Exclude Women?
Bookshelf
June 27, 2024

Fifth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Do Peacebuilding Practices Exclude Women?

Read Now
Why We’ve Had to Dramatically Shift How We Talk About UK Politics

Why We’ve Had to Dramatically Shift How We Talk About UK Politics

The upcoming UK General Election is often framed as ‘Rishi or Kier for PM.’ This is not, write the authors a textbook on UK politics, the questions being asked by actual Britons.

Read Now
How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

Yes, dad jokes can be fun. They play an important role in how we interact with our kids. But dad jokes may also help prepare them to handle embarrassment later in life.

Read Now
Fourth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Do Women Make Better Doctors? 

Fourth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Do Women Make Better Doctors? 

In this issue of The Evidence newsletter, journalist Josephine Lethbridge examines why women doctors see better outcomes in their patients’ health.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments