Insights

Watch the Video: What’s Next for #AcademicTwitter?

November 17, 2022 1973

Elon Musk’s recent purchase of Twitter has raised alarms about the spread of misinformation, hate speech and a lack of moderation, causing some academics to depart from the platform.

In a video interview hosted by Social Science Space’s sister site Methodspace, Stu Shulman, a social media researcher and the founder and CEO of Textifter, joined interviewer Janet Salmons to discuss the future of academic Twitter.

Shulman’s research predates Musk’s purchase of Twitter and has raised various concerns about security.

“It’s the voluminous amounts of hate I see in my own research. Also the systemic weaponization of Twitter against democratic systems of government globally,” he said. “Evolving tactics use Twitter trains (tagging 30 like-minded users), notification-rich replies, the ReTweet functionality, gamification, domestic and foreign meme warfare, the idolatry of influence via misinformation, bots and trolls, as well as paid amplifiers of all manner and variety.”

Throughout the interview, Shulman and Salmons discussed the political turmoil which has occurred on Twitter, including election denial, vaccine misinformation and other international conspiracies.

Shulman raised the possibility that misinformation, hate and other threats will become more prevalent in the future.

“What I’m worried about for the future is if it becomes easier rather than harder to do the things that didn’t work but they almost did in 2020,” he said.

He cited the utility of Twitter for academic analysis in various disciplines, and expressed concern that academic use of Twitter will be threatened by a lack of moderation.

“The reason so many academics study Twitter data is because of its availability and because of its format and its structure,” he said. “It’s easy to get data and that’s what drew the computer scientists to it early on and social scientists to it later. It made it amenable to capture and amenable to research.”

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

Four Reasons to Stop Using the Word ‘Populism’
Insights
March 4, 2024

Four Reasons to Stop Using the Word ‘Populism’

Read Now
Alison Gopnik on Care
Social Science Bites
March 4, 2024

Alison Gopnik on Care

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?
Communication
February 27, 2024

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Read Now
Contemporary Politics Focus of March Webinar Series
News
February 21, 2024

Contemporary Politics Focus of March Webinar Series

Read Now
A Behavioral Scientist’s Take on the Dangers of Self-Censorship in Science

A Behavioral Scientist’s Take on the Dangers of Self-Censorship in Science

The word censorship might bring to mind authoritarian regimes, book-banning, and restrictions on a free press, but Cory Clark, a behavioral scientist at […]

Read Now
A Black History Addendum to the American Music Industry

A Black History Addendum to the American Music Industry

The new editor of the case study series on the music industry discusses the history of Black Americans in the recording industry.

Read Now
The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

The Use of Bad Data Reveals a Need for Retraction in Governmental Data Bases

Retractions are generally framed as a negative: as science not working properly, as an embarrassment for the institutions involved, or as a flaw in the peer review process. They can be all those things. But they can also be part of a story of science working the right way: finding and correcting errors, and publicly acknowledging when information turns out to be incorrect.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments