Insights

Watch the Video: What’s Next for #AcademicTwitter?

November 17, 2022 3161

Elon Musk’s recent purchase of Twitter has raised alarms about the spread of misinformation, hate speech and a lack of moderation, causing some academics to depart from the platform.

In a video interview hosted by Social Science Space’s sister site Methodspace, Stu Shulman, a social media researcher and the founder and CEO of Textifter, joined interviewer Janet Salmons to discuss the future of academic Twitter.

Shulman’s research predates Musk’s purchase of Twitter and has raised various concerns about security.

“It’s the voluminous amounts of hate I see in my own research. Also the systemic weaponization of Twitter against democratic systems of government globally,” he said. “Evolving tactics use Twitter trains (tagging 30 like-minded users), notification-rich replies, the ReTweet functionality, gamification, domestic and foreign meme warfare, the idolatry of influence via misinformation, bots and trolls, as well as paid amplifiers of all manner and variety.”

Throughout the interview, Shulman and Salmons discussed the political turmoil which has occurred on Twitter, including election denial, vaccine misinformation and other international conspiracies.

Shulman raised the possibility that misinformation, hate and other threats will become more prevalent in the future.

“What I’m worried about for the future is if it becomes easier rather than harder to do the things that didn’t work but they almost did in 2020,” he said.

He cited the utility of Twitter for academic analysis in various disciplines, and expressed concern that academic use of Twitter will be threatened by a lack of moderation.

“The reason so many academics study Twitter data is because of its availability and because of its format and its structure,” he said. “It’s easy to get data and that’s what drew the computer scientists to it early on and social scientists to it later. It made it amenable to capture and amenable to research.”

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

Tom Gilovich On the Spotlight Effect
Social Science Bites
May 4, 2026

Tom Gilovich On the Spotlight Effect

Read Now
How Publishers Extract Money, Labor, and Data from Universities
Industry
April 29, 2026

How Publishers Extract Money, Labor, and Data from Universities

Read Now
Whose Work Most Influenced You? Part 6: A Social Science Bites Retrospective
Social Science Bites
April 22, 2026

Whose Work Most Influenced You? Part 6: A Social Science Bites Retrospective

Read Now
From Passive Consumption to Active Verification: Embedding Critical Thinking as a Daily Cognitive Habit in Higher Education 
Critical Thinking
April 7, 2026

From Passive Consumption to Active Verification: Embedding Critical Thinking as a Daily Cognitive Habit in Higher Education 

Read Now
Ellora Derenoncourt on the US Racial Wealth Gap

Ellora Derenoncourt on the US Racial Wealth Gap

This Social Science Bites podcast offers a dollop of good news and heaping helping of bad. The good news is that since […]

Read Now
Steven Pinker on Common Knowledge

Steven Pinker on Common Knowledge

There is a value to shared knowledge that tends to go unrecognized because it’s so ubiquitous. Nonetheless, experimental psychologist Steven Pinker explains […]

Read Now
Reaching Parts to Which AI Has No Access

Reaching Parts to Which AI Has No Access

David Canter considers informal places where people socialize, suggesting they’re an arena ChatGPT and other LLMs can’no’t replicate. As someone who lives […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments