Insights

How Employees and Employers Can Encourage Psychological Safety In The Workplace

September 4, 2023 644
Hand holds an image of the brain.
(Photo: Hainguyenrp/Pixabay)

Canada’s Safety and Health Week was May 1 to 6, and the United States’ Labor Day is September 4 this year. These offered us a chance to highlight and discuss safety, health and harm prevention in the workplace.

Workplaces have come a long way from a time when safety was equated with physical safety. Occupational health and safety is no longer simply about hardhats and steel-toed work boots — it’s also about psychological safety.

The emotional well-being of workers is critical to the success of any organization. Psychological safety is everyone’s responsibility, but hinges on leadership valuing and facilitating it.

Psychological safety

A psychologically safe workplace is one where it’s OK to make mistakes, it’s OK to not be OK and it’s OK to speak up and disagree with superiors or other members of your team.

A psychologically safe workplace is where employees feel comfortable taking risks and being themselves without fear of judgment, lateral violence (for example exclusion, bullying) or negative consequences.

A research initiative undertaken by Google called Project Aristotle identified psychological safety as the single most important factor for effective teams.

The project was named after the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, who once said “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.” Aristotle suggested that people who worked together could achieve better results than working alone.

The researchers looked at a range of factors, including team size, member diversity, communication styles and leadership, among others.

Amid worldwide concerns about a lack of equity, diversity, inclusion and accessibility, decreasing levels of retention and productivity and increasing amounts of burnout, committing to creating psychologically safe workplaces is the best way to help employees and teams function most effectively.

The Conversation logo
This article by Dayna Lee-Baggley and Shannan M. Grant originally appeared on The Conversation, a Social Science Space partner site, under the title “Fostering Psychological Safety In The Workplace: Four Practical, Real-Life Tips Based On Science.”

Benefits of psychological safety

Current evidence supports that psychological safety is positively associated with workplace engagement, innovation, job performance and job satisfaction — all favourable outcomes for institutions, organizations, the bottom line, clients and the larger community.

These benefits can be obtained through the creation and maintenance of workplaces where employees are able to express themselves, are treated with respect and dignity and do not experience hierarchical or lateral violence that can include bullying and exclusion.

Creating and maintaining a psychologically safe environment results in employees who are more likely to experience better relationships with colleagues and have better mental health. Choosing psychological safety is choosing to move away from shame and blame and move towards a culture of inclusion, openness and learning.

Several recent surveys on disability claims exemplify why employers should invest in employee psychological health and safety.

Telus Health reported that short-term disability claims, due to mental health, increased in prevalence by six percent and duration by 12 percent in 2021.

Deloitte found that 30 to 40 per cent of short-term disability claims were due to mental health issues prior to 2020. According to data from Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association members, claims for mental health supports increased by 24 per cent in 2020.

More and more employees consider workplace mental health support a key factor in whether they apply for and accept jobs. A recent survey by the American Psychological Association reported that 81 percent of survey respondents agreed that employer support for mental health was an important consideration in their job search.

In addition, 30 percent of respondents strongly agreed that employer support for mental health factored into their job decisions, which increased retention. In a challenging labor market, fostering psychological health and safety is key to attracting and keeping talent.

Psychological safety in ACTion

While it’s clear psychological safety benefits employees and employers, fostering it requires a commitment to learning, unlearning and collaboratively facilitating change over time.

Creating psychological safety also requires a specific set of skills that many workplaces are ill-equipped to foster in leaders and in employees.

The Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Matrix is an evidence-based tool designed to help people develop psychological flexibility — the ability to adapt and respond effectively to changing situations and circumstances.

Psychological flexibility includes having the ability to choose our actions, despite difficult inner thoughts and emotions like anger and feelings of distrust.

The individual ACT Matrix provides a framework for increasing psychological flexibility, fostering behavior change and increasing actions that are consistent with our values. It can be an effective intervention for promoting psychological safety in the workplace.

The team ACT Matrix focuses on having a shared purpose (shared values) to orient how members of a team move toward or away from shared purpose. It builds psychological safety by providing a way to communicate respectfully about difficult topics.

The ACT Matrix can increase psychological safety, collaboration, communication and psychological flexibility and reduce stress and emotional distress.

Strategies rooted in ACTion

The ACT Matrix provides us with several practical strategies for building psychological safety:

1) Notice your internal thoughts, feelings and sensations. Notice how they impact your behavior in the upper quadrant (for example, do they shut you down? Do you start avoiding or criticizing?). Name them and normalize them. By sharing our observations of our internal experiences, we can normalize them with others and build safety to “be OK not to be OK.” By connecting internal experiences to our behavior, we can pause and make choices about how we want to show up.

2) Consider choices in terms of “moving towards” or “moving away” from your values, instead of good and bad, right and wrong, or true and false. This is different than setting goals or creating action plans. There is no finish line for psychological safety, we just keep trying to make moves “toward” or contributing to psychological safety.

3) Discuss difficult topics with colleagues in terms of a “shared purpose.” Framing a discussion in terms of shared purpose puts everyone on the same side and allows everyone to come up with behaviours that make sense in the situation and for the people involved. It can also help employees understand the reason behind a colleague’s behaviour (in other words, they may consider that behaviour a move “towards” a shared purpose). This allows us to be our authentic selves in the workplace.

4) We can use the ACT Matrix to identify and name lateral violence in the workplace as “away moves.” Lateral violence equates to a psychologically unsafe environment. This can be bullying, exclusion or freezing people out, belittling others’ opinions, snide comments or remarks, gossiping, mobbing or sharing personal information. Colleagues may not recognize the impact of their behaviour on others. The ACT Matrix allows us to bring up such sensitive topics in the framework of “towards” and “away” moves.

By making use of the ACT Matrix, the complex skills of building psychological safety are broken down into practical steps that can be learned and practiced over time.

In this way, employees and employers can take meaningful steps together toward fostering psychological safety in the workplace.

Dayna Lee-Baggley (pictured) is an adjunct professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience at Dalhousie University. Shannan M. Grant is a registered dietitian and associate professor in the Department of Applied Human Nutrition at Mount Saint Vincent University.

View all posts by Dayna Lee-Baggley and Shannan M. Grant

Related Articles

There’s Something in the Air, Part 2 – But It’s Not a Miasma
Insights
April 15, 2024

There’s Something in the Air, Part 2 – But It’s Not a Miasma

Read Now
The Fog of War
Insights
April 12, 2024

The Fog of War

Read Now
A Community Call: Spotlight on Women’s Safety in the Music Industry 
Insights
March 22, 2024

A Community Call: Spotlight on Women’s Safety in the Music Industry 

Read Now
Using Translational Research as a Model for Long-Term Impact
Impact
March 21, 2024

Using Translational Research as a Model for Long-Term Impact

Read Now
Four Reasons to Stop Using the Word ‘Populism’

Four Reasons to Stop Using the Word ‘Populism’

Beyond poor academic practice, the careless use of the word ‘populism’ has also had a deleterious impact on wider public discourse, the authors argue.

Read Now
Alison Gopnik on Care

Alison Gopnik on Care

Caring makes us human.  This is one of the strongest ideas one could infer from the work that developmental psychologist Alison Gopnik is discovering in her work on child development, cognitive economics and caregiving.

Read Now
Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

Did the Mainstream Make the Far-Right Mainstream?

The processes of mainstreaming and normalization of far-right politics have much to do with the mainstream itself, if not more than with the far right.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments