News

Shared Leadership: What Do Employees Think About It? News
Traditional approaches to sharing leadership focus on the attitude of the manager. But what about the attitudes of the underlings asked to step up? (Photo: ELVIRAALMONTE /Pixabay)

Shared Leadership: What Do Employees Think About It?

November 6, 2023 2308


In this post, Henrico van Roekel of Utrecht University details research he conducted on healthcare employees who were given the opportunity, in an experimental setting, to share leadership – essentially flipping the script on traditional examinations of shared leadership. He details his research in the new paper “Examining employee willingness to execute shared leadership: The role of leadership behaviour, gender, age, and context” appearing in the journal Leadership.

Traditionally, we were all used to having a manager whom we report to. Yet in some situations, employees don’t necessarily need a formal leader anymore. Instead, they could be executing shared leadership, which means leadership is divided among employees in the team instead of concentrated with one person.

From previous research, we know that the success of shared leadership depends on the attitude of the manager: they must be willing to give up their position. But we actually know little about how employees feel about shared leadership. And, if they are open to the idea, what kind of shared leadership they do or do not want.

In a recent study, I conducted a large-scale experiment among 6,742 healthcare employees. I presented them with various leadership tasks in dilemma format, and varied multiple characteristics of the leadership tasks. I then asked them to choose which task they would like to do.

The results show that a notable proportion of healthcare workers are willing to exercise shared leadership. But their willingness does depend on a number of factors.

First, I found willingness depends on the task they have to perform. Employees prefer tasks that are about building relationships (like being a confidant for the team) or driving change in the team. More mundane tasks, like chairing team meetings, were less popular. Besides, employees prefer tasks that take less time and tasks that allow them to help others.

Second, not every employee is equally willing. Employees who are male or younger are more willing than female or older employees. We also find that employees are slightly more willing to share leadership during, rather than after, a crisis.

It appears that if you ask employees, shared leadership can, with some reservations, be a successful leadership approach. From this study we learned which factors may contribute to the success or failure of shared leadership: the specific leadership behavior that is to be shared, personal characteristics of the employees involved, and context play a role.

At the same time, we also need to take a critical look at the reasons behind the preferences expressed by employees. The fact that female healthcare employees are less willing to execute shared leadership could be due to the ways in which they are treated differently from male healthcare employees at work. It is important to take such underlying, systemic causes into account.

In sum, shared leadership is a promising leadership approach that implies giving employees a voice. This study has contributed to understanding shared leadership by doing the same: listening to what employees themselves have to say about it.



Henrico van Roekel is a PhD candidate and assistant professor at the Department of Public Administration and Organizational Science at Utrecht University. He studies public sector employees from a behavioral science perspective. This includes how leadership and the use of behavioral insights influence employee well-being and equal treatment of clients/citizens.

View all posts by Henrico van Roekel

Related Articles

From Isolation to Impact: Tackling the Emotional Toll of Ethnographic Research in Business and Society
Business and Management INK
April 22, 2025

From Isolation to Impact: Tackling the Emotional Toll of Ethnographic Research in Business and Society

Read Now
“Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost.” –Nintendo “Quit Screen” Message
Business and Management INK
April 8, 2025

“Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost.” –Nintendo “Quit Screen” Message

Read Now
Author Reflections on Intraorganizational Developmental Networks
Business and Management INK
April 2, 2025

Author Reflections on Intraorganizational Developmental Networks

Read Now
Covid-19 and the Crisis of Legitimacy
News
March 30, 2025

Covid-19 and the Crisis of Legitimacy

Read Now
Changing the World or Changing Ourselves?

Changing the World or Changing Ourselves?

In this blog post, co-authors Catherine Brentnall and David Higgins reflect on their interest in how educators change themselves and their practice […]

Read Now
Generative AI Literacy: A Proposed Way Forward

Generative AI Literacy: A Proposed Way Forward

In this article, co-authors Stefanie Beninger, Alex Reppel, Julie Stanton and Forrest Watson reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Facilitating Generative AI […]

Read Now
Those ‘Indirect Costs’ Targeted by DOGE Directly Support America’s Research Excellence

Those ‘Indirect Costs’ Targeted by DOGE Directly Support America’s Research Excellence

Biomedical research in the U.S. is world-class in part because of a long-standing partnership between universities and the federal government. On Feb. […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments