Bookshelf

Seventh Edition of ‘The Evidence’: The Rise of Unsafe Abortions after Roe v Wade 

August 30, 2024 439

In this month’s edition of The Evidence newsletter, Josephine Lethbridge explores reproductive rights after the end of Roe v Wade, highlighting research on the potentially unsafe methods used in self-managed abortions. 

In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its earlier Roe v Wade ruling which had legalized abortion nationwide. Since then, 22 states have taken measures to restrict abortion to a greater extent.  

New research has uncovered a rise in the number of reproductive-aged women in the US attempting to induce their own abortions post-Roe v Wade.  Worryingly, the majority of those surveyed used potentially unsafe methods for self-management.  

Globally, abortion access varies widely, with estimates indicating that 45% of abortions are unsafe.  

So, what needs to change? 

Experts emphasize that there are safe ways to self-manage an abortion. For instance, in the first trimester of pregnancy, individuals can safely manage their own abortions using the drugs mifepristone or misoprostol. However, as Lethbridge writes, “lack of access to such knowledge is the first and most important stumbling block” to safe self-management.  

Communicating the evidence on abortions is vital for providing help to those who need it.   

Read this month’s full newsletter to learn about advocating for safer, more accessible care for all, in communities, workplaces, and in policy. 

An archive of previous issues can be accessed through Social Science Space

Sage – the parent of Social Science Space – sponsors The Evidence, a bold new feminist newsletter that covers everything you need to know about the latest social and behavioral science research into gender inequality. The newsletter makes research accessible and understandable, empowering readers to respond to today’s crises by making changes in their communities, their workplaces, or in the laws of their country. 

Joe Sweeney is a corporate communications at Sage. Prior to working for Sage he earned a master’s degree in English literature, with a focus on photography, architecture, and fiction writing from 1900—present.

View all posts by Joe Sweeney

Related Articles

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI
International Debate
September 11, 2024

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

Read Now
Partnership Marks Milestone in Advancing Black Scholarship 
Communication
September 10, 2024

Partnership Marks Milestone in Advancing Black Scholarship 

Read Now
Where Did We Get the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?
Communication
August 14, 2024

Where Did We Get the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?

Read Now
Sixth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: We Need a New Approach to Preventing Sexual Violence
Bookshelf
July 26, 2024

Sixth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: We Need a New Approach to Preventing Sexual Violence

Read Now
Stop Buying Cobras: Halting the Rise of Fake Academic Papers

Stop Buying Cobras: Halting the Rise of Fake Academic Papers

It is estimated that all journals, irrespective of discipline, experience a steeply rising number of fake paper submissions. Currently, the rate is about 2 percent. That may sound small. But, given the large and growing amount of scholarly publications it means that a lot of fake papers are published. Each of these can seriously damage patients, society or nature when applied in practice.

Read Now
Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive

Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive

The retraction of academic papers often functions as an indictment against a researcher’s reputation. Tim Kersjes argues that for retractions to function as an effective corrective to the scholarly record, they need shed this punitive reputation.

Read Now
Uncovering ‘Sneaked References’ in an Article’s Metadata

Uncovering ‘Sneaked References’ in an Article’s Metadata

The authors describe how by chance they learned how some actors have added extra references, invisible in the text but present in the articles’ metadata, when those unscrupulous actors submitted the articles to scientific databases.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments