A space to explore, share and shape the issues facing social and behavioral scientists
The editor–in-chief of the ‘Psychological Science’ explains why the journal is now encouraging authors to share the data and materials behind their research with their reviewers.
How can we create reliable and replicable political science data? A recent article in the ‘American Political Science Review’ focuses on text analysis and suggests ways to make these data sound and reproducible.
At the scene of many a dismal day for partisans of social and behavioral science, a hearing Tuesday on Capitol Hill saw proponents of the disciplines loud and proud. However, those hoping for an $8 billion budget next year for the NSF had less to be happy about.
[We’re pleased to welcome Andreas B. Eisengerich, who collaborated with Omar Merlo, Seigyoung Auh, and Hae Eun Helen Chun on […]
Science is considered a source of truth and the importance of its role in shaping modern society cannot be overstated. […]
The political science journal Comparative Political Studies is experimenting for one special issue in which articles will be judged based on reviewers’ evaluations of what authors intend to do rather than what they report as their findings.
International Clinical Trials Day is on Tuesday May 20th but half of all clinical trials have never been published and […]
While figures like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange have been in the public eye in recent years, whistleblowers are not […]
Modern-day organizations increasingly are seeking to create an “open” work environment—one that makes workers more observable—theorizing that transparency boosts performance. […]
In today’s management world, the growing consensus holds that transparency is good for any organization. But a study in the […]
