Impact

National Science Foundation responds to Senate staff report

July 29, 2011 1703

Eddie Bernice Johnson, Ranking Minority Member of the National Science Foundation Committee, has released a  staff report refuting a recent Senate report on the NSF which claims that the agency had wasted  three billion dollars of federal funding.

The Congresswoman stated, “I am sure that the Senate staff report was intended to be an important, detailed review of NSF, but in the end, our Committee staff could find almost no actual savings in the report.  NSF does not have $1.7 billion that they can return to the Treasury.  The report offers no proof that NSF has $1.2 billion in programs that are duplicative with those of other agencies.  Finally the claim by the report’s authors that they could find $65 million in questionable research projects appears to be built on a very superficial examination of the awards—in fact, it appears that at least four of the cited studies were not even funded by NSF.”

“It is important to engage in a serious discussion of those areas of federal spending where we can save money.  However, that dialogue—and our subsequent decisions—should be rooted in the facts.  The allegations in the Senate staff report were very, very serious, but they turn out to be mistaken.  As a result, there is no information in the report that can help inform Congress’s decisions about NSF funding and priorities.”

Committee polls found that few researchers cited in the Senate report felt that it accurately described their work; furthermore, none of the researchers who responded to Committee staff questions had ever been contacted by Senate staff about the work cited in the Senate staff report.

Click here to read more about the Senate report, and Congresswoman Johnson’s response.

Editorial Assistant - Social Science Journals at SAGE in Los Angeles

View all posts by Lisa Hanson

Related Articles

Economic Peaks, Troughs and This Year’s Nobelists in Economics
Impact
October 15, 2026

Economic Peaks, Troughs and This Year’s Nobelists in Economics

Read Now
What We Miss When We Study Public Trust with Surveys Alone
Artificial Intelligence
October 14, 2026

What We Miss When We Study Public Trust with Surveys Alone

Read Now
Four From Social Science World Receive 2026 MacArthur Fellowships
Impact
October 1, 2026

Four From Social Science World Receive 2026 MacArthur Fellowships

Read Now
Alex Edmans on Market Irrationality
International Debate
October 1, 2026

Alex Edmans on Market Irrationality

Read Now
Quick Insight: Euan Adie on Getting Academics Credit for Their Impact 

Quick Insight: Euan Adie on Getting Academics Credit for Their Impact 

Euan Adie, the founder of Altmetric and later of Overton, discusses the reasons the led to Overton’s focus on showing researchers how […]

Read Now
Influential Paper Defending Climate Change’s Great Acceleration Wins 10-year Impact Award

Influential Paper Defending Climate Change’s Great Acceleration Wins 10-year Impact Award

“The Great Acceleration” is a concept in the scholarship over climate change that highlights the correlation between extreme human economic activity and […]

Read Now
NSF’s Embattled SBE Directorate Shown as Agency’s Policy Heavyweight

NSF’s Embattled SBE Directorate Shown as Agency’s Policy Heavyweight

Here’s a couple of quick questions for you. What is the smallest of the eight discipline-based directorates at the United States’ National […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted