Featured

Neoclassical economists don’t understand neoclassical economics

August 15, 2011 10778

This post was originally published on Steve Keen’s Debtwatch.

That transcendental truth occurred to me while writing the second edition of Debunking Economics–which will be published in September. In this video, I point out the most egregious instance of this, the “Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu” (SMD) conditions. This refers to research by leading neoclassical economists on whether the so-called “Law of Demand” that can be proven for an individual’s demand curve applies to a market demand curve.

The “Law of Demand” is the proposition that, if a commodity’s price falls, the demand for it will rise. That sounds like a reasonable statement at first glance–and it will often be true in the real world. But it is an article of faith for economists that this is always true.

Ironically, neoclassical economists proved that this is in general not true. Even when you are working with individuals who all individually have what economists call “well behaved” preferences, and for whom individual demand curves can be derived that obey the “Law of Demand”, the market demand derived by summing these individual demands can have any shape at all.

If neoclassical economists took this neoclassical result seriously, then they would not draw “downward sloping market demand curves” in microeconomics–they would instead draw squiggly lines–and they wouldn’t use equilibrium “supply and demand” analysis. But not only do they do that, they also model the entire economy as a single individual in what they call “Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium” models.

These absurd models were what led to them believing that the economy was in great shape, just before it collapsed into the Great Recession.

I cover this issue at great length in Debunking Economics II. In this video presentation, I give an overview of the SMD conditions. At one point, you’ll hear me take a straw poll of how many people in the room knew of these conditions: only two did out of about 60. This was a brilliant illustration of my basic point, that neoclassical economists don’t understand their own theory.

Click here for the Powerpoint slides.

Steve Keen is Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Western Sydney, and author of ‘Debunking economics’.

Related Articles

What We Miss When We Study Public Trust with Surveys Alone
Artificial Intelligence
October 14, 2026

What We Miss When We Study Public Trust with Surveys Alone

Read Now
Alex Edmans on Market Irrationality
International Debate
October 1, 2026

Alex Edmans on Market Irrationality

Read Now
Strengthening Student AI Literacy at Critical Thinking Bootcamp 2026 
Artificial Intelligence
August 27, 2026

Strengthening Student AI Literacy at Critical Thinking Bootcamp 2026 

Read Now
Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated
Insights
August 9, 2026

Why Sociology Should Not Be Liquidated

Read Now
The Odyssey and the Social Order

The Odyssey and the Social Order

A clunky booking website and my failure to check dates before pressing ‘buy’ meant that I saw Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey on […]

Read Now
Watch the Panel: Academic Freedom and the Role of the Academic Librarian

Watch the Panel: Academic Freedom and the Role of the Academic Librarian

As part of its ongoing commitment to academic freedom, Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, hosted a panel discussion at the 2026 […]

Read Now
From ‘Which Database?’ to ‘Under What Conditions?’: Teaching Critical Thinking Through Search Tool Selection in an AI Age

From ‘Which Database?’ to ‘Under What Conditions?’: Teaching Critical Thinking Through Search Tool Selection in an AI Age

A few years ago, if you asked students where they began their research, the answer was predictable: “Google” or “Google Scholar.” Today, […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted