‘Rick Perry’s anti-science America’

Paul Stoller considers the implications of ‘anti-science’ political candidates being elected to high office in the US and the likely impact on the humanities and social sciences, in a blog for the Huffington Post.

“…Should an anti-science candidate like Rick Perry get elected to the U.S. presidency, what might we expect in the world of higher education? He would most certainly appoint like-minded cronies to important posts to implement his anti-science policies. Citing the lack of its economic return, he would probably recommend that the federal funding of pure scientific research be cut substantially. Like David Cameron, he would probably be thrilled to cut research in the social science and humanities, an exceedingly small slice of the current federal budget, to unsustainable levels. He would probably want to make deeper cuts to federal programs that help students pay increasingly high college tuitions.These kinds of political moves, which are based upon an ignorant populism that falsely cast scientists and humanists as members of an effete elite, would obliterate higher education in America. In Governor Perry’s Anti-Science America the drastic restriction of education funding would “dumb-down” the curriculum, make it exceedingly difficult for scholars to engage in research to contribute to knowledge and refine teaching, and would make it impossible for millions of deserving students to educate themselves in what is now an highly competitive world in which getting a job requires the skills you acquire in a college or a university.

“But life is more than simply going to work, if you’re lucky enough to have a job, and returning home. If you deny the value of science, the arts, and the humanities, if you cast aspersions on college and university teaching, what does that mean for the quality of social life in America? It means that in Rick Perry’s Anti-Science America, in which the gap between rich and poor would increase even more, poverty would not only be expressed economically, but socially and culturally as well…”

Read the full post here.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What extremely insightful and important commentary this is about the potential of electing another “anti-science” US President. After eight years of President Bush’s “other” war — the “War on Science” (as termed in one of the most powerful pieces I’ve ever read in Scientific American) — it is terrifying to think of the implications of electing another education, specifically science, ignorant government official. I’ll never forget the many bumbling, inarticulate speeches and comments Bush gave in regard to such issues as stem cell research and discontinuing support for public school systems that chose to teach something beyond abstinence-only sexual education.… Read more »

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x