News

Revisiting Social Science Space Articles on the Election

November 7, 2016 1156

vote_optSocial scientists have been as focused on the American presidential election as intently as all Americans and big proportion on the world at large. And as that impulse rippled through academe, Social Science Space was there to examine some of the wavelets lapping at social science’s shore.

The Year of Trump

Last year, before Brexit was really a word or Trump a potential global leader, linguist Ruth Wodak saw her book The Politics of Fear — The Politics of Fear – What Right- Wing Populist Discourses Mean be published by SAGE Publishing (the parent of Social Science Space). In our article “Interpreting Trump Through the Politics of Fear,” Social Science Space editor talked with Wodak about how the Doanld would have figured if her book had just come out a year or so later.

Some academics, like political scientists Emily Beaulieu and Kathleen Searles, focused on gender differences in political outcomes, as their article “#WomenAlsoKnowStuff (Even About Politics)” demonstrates – and which could broadly be seen as being about and hence were more about Hilary Clinton’s candidacy. But most of the quick-turnaround research this year focused on Donald Trump. That was the case for Brenda Major and her colleagues, who, as our Pacific Standard friend Tom Jacobs detailed in “Explaining Donald Trump’s Hold on Many White Voters,” looked at the trends in primary campaigning to come up with a real-time picture of racial resentment among voters.

We turned to a U.S. senator, Bob Graham, and his co-author Chris Hand to explain “What Trump’s Veep Choice Can Teach Us About Coalitions.” This article, a chapter from the pair’s book America, the Owner’s Manual: You Can Fight City Hall—and Win, examined Indiana governor, and current GOP vice presidential candidate, Mike Pence’s actions in the wake of his state’s law that some saw of creating conditions to legally oppose gay rights.

Bite-Sized History

Our blogger Howard J. Silver, who spent years lobbying for social science in Washington, D.C., took the opportunity offered by the election to detail some of the history behind America’s favorite interactive sport. His articles — “A Short History of Contested Presidential Elections,” “How Much Do Campaigns (and Debates) Really Matter?” and “Vice Presidents: American Politics’ Vestigial Organ” – make fine primers for those wanting an election-night primer on what’s happened in the past as a guide to what’s happening now.

What Does Research Say?

Besides the sheer spectacle of this election, the campaign has thrown up myriad fascinating questions about the evolving political landscape of the United States, the apparent triumph of polarization and the disappearance of a middle ground, and even what will the legacy be of America’s first African-American president. And so Social Science Space and the The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science teamed up to present a webinar on “Elections in America” with noted political scientists Larry Bartels, Lynn Vavreck and Gary Jacobsen. Listen to the recorded version of their hour-long chat HERE.

Not all the things that appeared on Social Science Space necessarily had the words “Trump” or “Clinton” in them. In “Voters Demand Facts But Do They Want Them?” Nick Chater used the results of the Brexit campaign to answer that question.

Ivor Crewe, meanwhile, has spent his career on the subject of psephology, or the study of elections. The president of Britain’s Academy of Social Sciences and the master of Oxford’s University College sat down with our Social Science Bites podcast crew to discuss polling in particular, explain the focus on the reason for the results, not the results themselves. While his talk occurred a political lifetime ago – the upcoming elections were IndyRef and the U.S. midterms – the conversation is as valid as the day it was recorded. Listen to it HERE.

In Memoriam

And lastly, not all who studied elections survived to witness this one. We close by recalling the late Philip Converse, who was, as one eulogist wrote, “responsible for an extraordinary number of foundational works in the behavioral study of politics.” For more on an academic whose influence is felt every time a pundit starts talking about the electorate, take a look at “Probing the ‘Informed’ Voter: Philip Converse, 1928-2014.”


Related Articles

Contemporary Politics Focus of March Webinar Series
News
February 21, 2024

Contemporary Politics Focus of March Webinar Series

Read Now
There’s Something In the Air…But Is It a Virus? Part 1
Public Policy
January 18, 2024

There’s Something In the Air…But Is It a Virus? Part 1

Read Now
The Social Sciences Are Under Attack in Higher Education
News
January 2, 2024

The Social Sciences Are Under Attack in Higher Education

Read Now
Jonathan Breckon On Knowledge Brokerage and Influencing Policy
Interview
December 6, 2023

Jonathan Breckon On Knowledge Brokerage and Influencing Policy

Read Now
New Thought Leadership Webinar Series Opens with Regional Looks at Research Impact

New Thought Leadership Webinar Series Opens with Regional Looks at Research Impact

Research impact will be the focus of a new webinar series from Epigeum, which provides online courses for universities and colleges. The […]

Read Now
Shared Leadership: What Do Employees Think About It?

Shared Leadership: What Do Employees Think About It?

Traditional approaches to sharing leadership focus on the attitude of the manager. But what about the attitudes of the underlings asked to step up?

Read Now
Watch The Lecture: The ‘E’ In Science Stands For Equity

Watch The Lecture: The ‘E’ In Science Stands For Equity

According to the National Science Foundation, the percentage of American adults with a great deal of trust in the scientific community dropped […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments