Impact

Whither the Children When Parents Are Incarcerated?

August 6, 2019 1729

Dr. Shona Minson, from the University of Oxford, is the winner of the Outstanding Early Career Impact Prize, in the ESRC Celebrating Impact Prize 2019.

In her PhD research she looks at whether or not the impacts of children are considered when parents sentenced in criminal courts in England. Known as the first study to hear directly from children and carers about their experiences she plans to find whether children’s rights under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child are upheld.

The ESRC is celebrating its Impact prize winners. Here we have an in depth look at Dr. Shona Minson and how she is making an impact today.

Currently an estimated 312,000 children annually lose a parent to imprisonment in England and Wales. Dr Minson found that children of women sentenced to prison are treated without the concern given to children separated from their parents in the family courts. she argues that judges and magistrates are inconsistent in how they consider dependent children, and do not understand how the children are affected when their primary carer is sentenced.

“For many children, the separation from their primary carer can have long term implications… its really made [Harrow Crown Court] think that we really do need to understand, properly before we pass sentence, what the implications are…”
Judge Rosa Dean

Dr. Minson’s research on how the sentencing of mothers affects children has changed practice for judges, magistrates and Probation Officers, who now consider how children will be affected by their parents’ sentence.

Watch the in depth video about Dr. Minson’s research and the impact generated below:



ESRC Celebrating Impact logo

The ESRC is celebrating its Impact prize winners. Here we have an in depth look at the winners research and how they are making an impact today.


Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, is a global academic publisher of books, journals, and library resources with a growing range of technologies to enable discovery, access, and engagement. Believing that research and education are critical in shaping society, 24-year-old Sara Miller McCune founded Sage in 1965. Today, we are controlled by a group of trustees charged with maintaining our independence and mission indefinitely. 

View all posts by Sage

Related Articles

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures
Impact
September 23, 2024

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Read Now
Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate
Impact
September 18, 2024

Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate

Read Now
Webinar: Fundamentals of Research Impact
Event
September 4, 2024

Webinar: Fundamentals of Research Impact

Read Now
Paper Opening Science to the New Statistics Proves Its Import a Decade Later
Impact
July 2, 2024

Paper Opening Science to the New Statistics Proves Its Import a Decade Later

Read Now
A Milestone Dataset on the Road to Self-Driving Cars Proves Highly Popular

A Milestone Dataset on the Road to Self-Driving Cars Proves Highly Popular

The idea of an autonomous vehicle – i.e., a self-driving car – isn’t particularly new. Leonardo da Vinci had some ideas he […]

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Social sciences can also inform the design and creation of ethical frameworks and guidelines for AI development and for deployment into systems. Social scientists can contribute expertise: on data quality, equity, and reliability; on how bias manifests in AI algorithms and decision-making processes; on how AI technologies impact marginalized communities and exacerbate existing inequities; and on topics such as fairness, transparency, privacy, and accountability.

Read Now
Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Drawing on a study of Crossref DOI data, Martin Eve finds evidence to suggest that the current standard of digital preservation could fall worryingly short of ensuring persistent accurate record of scholarly works.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments