Impact

To Err Is Human, To Impact Divine Impact
The goal of AllTrials is to improve transparency for medical trials. (Photo: U.S. Army photo by Rick Scavetta, U.S. Army Africa Public Affairs/Flickr)

To Err Is Human, To Impact Divine

October 31, 2019 2915

The greatest value of research is the positive impact it has on society. Academically driven insights and discoveries influence and inform policy, practice and public life. This is the first in a series of blog posts looking at seminal academic articles from a collection — SAGE Inspire — curated by SAGE Publishing’s journal editors, who based their nominations on the content’s real-world impact.

An assessment of the real-world impact of …

“The Gift of Fine China: An Appropriate 20th Anniversary Look Back”

by Erica Li and David Nash

Traditionally, an appropriate 20th wedding anniversary gift involves china. Although fine china can endure decades without a scratch, it also can be extremely fragile. Without proper care, it can break. This year, we celebrate the 20th anniversary of To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System, which was published by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1999. …

American Journal of Medical Quality, 34(5), 425-429

In 1999, America’s Institute of Medicine (today’s National Academy of Medicine) issued a landmark report, To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. In recognition of that impactful report, which suggested that almost 100,000 deaths a year could be linked to preventable medical errors, the American Journal of Medical Quality decided to examine its own archive of impact-rich writings in the years since To Err published.

In the September/October 2019 special issue of the journal republishes the 11 most impactful articles to appear in its pages since 1999. Dr. Erica Li of Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals and Dr. David B. Nash, editor emeritus of the journal and founding dean emeritus and the professor of health policy at the Jefferson College of Population Health, wrote an editorial which briefly discusses each article and outlines why that particular piece matters based on its quantitative metrics and qualitative influence.

The journal, which is the official publication of the American College of Medical Quality, started its examination by first identifying the 50 most downloaded and 50 most cited article. As Li and Nash write, “Six articles showed up in both lists, making those articles the most cited and downloaded in the last 20 years. The remaining 5 articles were chosen from the same top 50 lists based on themes and overall impact.” The  earliest of the 11 was published in 2005 and the latest in 2017.

“[B]y looking back on the most impactful AJMQ articles of the last 20 years,” Li and Nash’s introduction reads, “we can appreciate the advances we have made. We have taken strides to improve outcomes, communication, payment systems, teamwork training, leadership, and integration of the health system. As much as these articles reflect the progress we have made, there is still a great deal of work to be done to continue improving our health system.”

The 11 articles range from somewhat technical examinations, such as ““Prevention of Nosocomial Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Through Computerized Feedback to Physicians and a Nurse-Directed Protocol” from 2005, to more meta discussions, such as “The Quality of Qualitative Research,” an article by Dave Collingridge and Edwin Gantt that came out in 2008.

The chosen articles definitely include examinations of medical and surgical issues, such as “Reduction in Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Rates After Implementation of Infection Control Measures at a Level 3 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit” from 2016. But a majority touch on ecosystem concerns in medicine, such as workforce (“United States Registered Nurse Workforce Report Card and Shortage Forecast”), payment (“Big Things Come in Bundled Packages: Implications of Bundled Payment Systems in Health Care Reimbursement Reform” ) and especially training (“TeamSTEPPS: Assuring Optimal Teamwork in Clinical Settings” and “Approaching the Evidence Basis for Aviation-Derived Teamwork Training in Medicine”).

These wider concerns actually reflect the Institute of Medicine’s original report from 1999. “At that time,” write Li and Nash, “the IOM urged the nation’s health care system to improve the safety of health care through improving communication, teamwork behavior, leadership, and integration of the fractured health system.”

Listen to a discussion of this special issue

Related Articles

Norman B. Anderson, 1955-2024: Pioneering Psychologist and First Director of OBSSR
Impact
March 4, 2024

Norman B. Anderson, 1955-2024: Pioneering Psychologist and First Director of OBSSR

Read Now
New Feminist Newsletter The Evidence Makes Research on Gender Inequality Widely Accessible
Impact
March 4, 2024

New Feminist Newsletter The Evidence Makes Research on Gender Inequality Widely Accessible

Read Now
New Podcast Series Applies Social Science to Social Justice Issues
Impact
February 28, 2024

New Podcast Series Applies Social Science to Social Justice Issues

Read Now
The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting
Impact
February 26, 2024

The Importance of Using Proper Research Citations to Encourage Trustworthy News Reporting

Read Now
Connecting Legislators and Researchers, Leads to Policies Based on Scientific Evidence

Connecting Legislators and Researchers, Leads to Policies Based on Scientific Evidence

The author’s team is developing ways to connect policymakers with university-based researchers – and studying what happens when these academics become the trusted sources, rather than those with special interests who stand to gain financially from various initiatives.

Read Now
Your Data Likely Isn’t Best Served in a Pie Chart

Your Data Likely Isn’t Best Served in a Pie Chart

Overall, it is best to use pie charts sparingly, especially when there is a more “digestible” alternative – the bar chart.

Read Now
Philip Rubin: FABBS’ Accidental Essential Man Linking Research and Policy

Philip Rubin: FABBS’ Accidental Essential Man Linking Research and Policy

As he stands down from a two-year stint as the president of the Federation of Associations in Behavioral & Brain Sciences, or FABBS, Social Science Space took the opportunity to download a fraction of the experiences of cognitive psychologist Philip Rubin, especially his experiences connecting science and policy.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments