Business and Management INK

Pass Incomplete — How to Keep Healthcare Clinicians from Dropping the Ball

January 9, 2024 100

In this article, Melanie Barlow explores the importance of training healthcare clinicians to appropriately respond to potential errors in care and the effects of failing to do so. Barlow discusses this topic, alongside collaborators Bernadette Watson, Elizabeth Jones, Kate Morse, Fiona Maccallum, and Jenny Rudolph. in “Building a Workplace-Based Learning Culture: The “Receiver’s” Perspective on Speaking Up,” a recently published article in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.

Imagine in a game of American football if the quarterback threw the ball for the final play of the match and the wide receiver — instead of taking the catch — stands still and watches it fly past them over the sideline. If you were to keep sending the ball and your teammate rarely caught it, or caught it and threw it hard back into your face, of course you are going to stop throwing the ball to them! The end result, everyone feels disheartened because you routinely lose the play and often the match.

Well, in healthcare speaking up, we teach clinicians how to throw the ball (how to speak up about a potential error in care, or have a safety concern), but overwhelmingly fail to teach them how to catch it (receive the message and respond). As a result, voiced concerns are often missed, misunderstood, ignored, or receivers don’t know how to manage their emotions, so they get defensive about someone potentially pointing out an error and rudely respond (throw the ball back hard). The frequent end result, we lose the match as patients get physically harmed, whilst clinicians get psychologically stressed.

As a registered nurse I have had to speak up for patient safety innumerable times, however on one occasion the ball was thrown exceptionally hard back at me and we absolutely lost the match, a patient was harmed. Later in my career as an educator developing a speaking up program, I thought, right! Let’s train the receiver.

How do I do that? At the time, there was not a single paper within the healthcare literature that had studied receiver behavior within speaking-up interactions. Well, if no one else has researched this, then I need to. Six and half years and three research studies later, there are clear patterns as to what influences speaking up message reception and response. Hierarchy, professional identity (clinical discipline), context (who else is present) and how the message is delivered all are of influence. Results help clarify that how we currently teach clinicians to speak up via standardized mnemonics is just not cutting it. The standardized wording does not account for context or professional identity, key influences on the receiver. It is like throwing the ball the exact same way (strength, direction) to someone who is standing still vs running or jumping in the air or actively being tackled. The receiver is going to have a hard time catching the ball!

This paper is a qualitative element to one of the three receiver-focused studies. The goal is that this collective work will inform how to start training our clinicians to be more proficient in catching the ball.

Melanie Barlow (pictured) is the senior lecturer and academic lead of specialized learning environments and simulation at Australian Catholic University. She is a registered nurse with a passion for improving healthcare communication. Bernadette Watson is an honorary professor in the school of psychology at The University of Queensland, Australia. She is an expert in many areas, including quality of care and communication, doctor-patient relationships, communication in medicine, and health communication. She is a qualified researcher with a large plethora of published academic articles. Elizabeth Jones is the current head of the department of psychology at Monash University Malaysia. She has worked in the psychology field for over 30 years and has expertise in social and organization psychology. As a researcher, she is interested in health service delivery, professional-patient communication, and organizational and health communication. Kate J. Morse is the assistant dean for experiential learning and innovation and an associate clinical professor in the College of Nursing and Health Professions at Drexel University. Morse worked as a nurse practitioner for over 23 years and now focuses on "simulated patients." Fiona Maccallum is a senior lecturer in clinical psychology in the school of psychology at The University of Queensland, Australia. As a researcher, she has specific interests in grief and loss, trauma emotion regulation, and anxiety. Her specific work is mechanism focused, and she has amassed a journal article catalog of over 45 entries. Jenny Rudolph is the senior director of innovation at the Center for Medical Simulation. She has a PhD in organizational behavior from Boston College and has specific interests in healthcare education and collaboration at point of care.

View all posts by Melanie Barlow, Bernadette Watson, Elizabeth Jones, Kate J. Morse, Fiona Maccallum, and Jenny Rudolph

Related Articles

Interorganizational Design for Collaborative Governance in Co-Owned Major Projects: An Engaged Scholarship Approach
Business and Management INK
April 23, 2024

Interorganizational Design for Collaborative Governance in Co-Owned Major Projects: An Engaged Scholarship Approach

Read Now
Uncharted Waters: Researching Bereavement in the Workplace
Business and Management INK
April 22, 2024

Uncharted Waters: Researching Bereavement in the Workplace

Read Now
The Power of Fuzzy Expectations: Enhancing Equity in Australian Higher Education
Business and Management INK
April 22, 2024

The Power of Fuzzy Expectations: Enhancing Equity in Australian Higher Education

Read Now
How Do Firms Create Government Regulations?
Business and Management INK
April 18, 2024

How Do Firms Create Government Regulations?

Read Now
Challenging, But Worth It: Overcoming Paradoxical Tensions of Identity to Embrace Transformative Technologies in Teaching and Learning

Challenging, But Worth It: Overcoming Paradoxical Tensions of Identity to Embrace Transformative Technologies in Teaching and Learning

In this article, Isabel Fischer and Kerry Dobbins reflect on their work, “Is it worth it? How paradoxical tensions of identity shape the readiness of management educators to embrace transformative technologies in their teaching,” which was recently published in the Journal of Management Education.

Read Now
Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in the Complex Environment of Megaprojects: Implications for Practitioners and Project Organizing Theory

Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in the Complex Environment of Megaprojects: Implications for Practitioners and Project Organizing Theory

The authors review the ways in which data analytics and artificial intelligence can engender more stability and efficiency in megaprojects. They evaluate the present and likely future use of digital technology—particularly with regard to construction projects — discuss the likely benefits, and also consider some of the challenges around digitization.

Read Now
Putting People at the Heart of the Research Process

Putting People at the Heart of the Research Process

In this article, Jessica Weaver, Philippa Hunter-Jones, and Rory Donnelly reflect on “Unlocking the Full Potential of Transformative Service Research by Embedding Collaboration Throughout the Research Process,” which can be found in the Journal of Service Research.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments