Business and Management INK

Pass Incomplete — How to Keep Healthcare Clinicians from Dropping the Ball

January 9, 2024 292

In this article, Melanie Barlow explores the importance of training healthcare clinicians to appropriately respond to potential errors in care and the effects of failing to do so. Barlow discusses this topic, alongside collaborators Bernadette Watson, Elizabeth Jones, Kate Morse, Fiona Maccallum, and Jenny Rudolph. in “Building a Workplace-Based Learning Culture: The “Receiver’s” Perspective on Speaking Up,” a recently published article in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.

Imagine in a game of American football if the quarterback threw the ball for the final play of the match and the wide receiver — instead of taking the catch — stands still and watches it fly past them over the sideline. If you were to keep sending the ball and your teammate rarely caught it, or caught it and threw it hard back into your face, of course you are going to stop throwing the ball to them! The end result, everyone feels disheartened because you routinely lose the play and often the match.

Well, in healthcare speaking up, we teach clinicians how to throw the ball (how to speak up about a potential error in care, or have a safety concern), but overwhelmingly fail to teach them how to catch it (receive the message and respond). As a result, voiced concerns are often missed, misunderstood, ignored, or receivers don’t know how to manage their emotions, so they get defensive about someone potentially pointing out an error and rudely respond (throw the ball back hard). The frequent end result, we lose the match as patients get physically harmed, whilst clinicians get psychologically stressed.

As a registered nurse I have had to speak up for patient safety innumerable times, however on one occasion the ball was thrown exceptionally hard back at me and we absolutely lost the match, a patient was harmed. Later in my career as an educator developing a speaking up program, I thought, right! Let’s train the receiver.

How do I do that? At the time, there was not a single paper within the healthcare literature that had studied receiver behavior within speaking-up interactions. Well, if no one else has researched this, then I need to. Six and half years and three research studies later, there are clear patterns as to what influences speaking up message reception and response. Hierarchy, professional identity (clinical discipline), context (who else is present) and how the message is delivered all are of influence. Results help clarify that how we currently teach clinicians to speak up via standardized mnemonics is just not cutting it. The standardized wording does not account for context or professional identity, key influences on the receiver. It is like throwing the ball the exact same way (strength, direction) to someone who is standing still vs running or jumping in the air or actively being tackled. The receiver is going to have a hard time catching the ball!

This paper is a qualitative element to one of the three receiver-focused studies. The goal is that this collective work will inform how to start training our clinicians to be more proficient in catching the ball.

Melanie Barlow (pictured) is the senior lecturer and academic lead of specialized learning environments and simulation at Australian Catholic University. She is a registered nurse with a passion for improving healthcare communication. Bernadette Watson is an honorary professor in the school of psychology at The University of Queensland, Australia. She is an expert in many areas, including quality of care and communication, doctor-patient relationships, communication in medicine, and health communication. She is a qualified researcher with a large plethora of published academic articles. Elizabeth Jones is the current head of the department of psychology at Monash University Malaysia. She has worked in the psychology field for over 30 years and has expertise in social and organization psychology. As a researcher, she is interested in health service delivery, professional-patient communication, and organizational and health communication. Kate J. Morse is the assistant dean for experiential learning and innovation and an associate clinical professor in the College of Nursing and Health Professions at Drexel University. Morse worked as a nurse practitioner for over 23 years and now focuses on "simulated patients." Fiona Maccallum is a senior lecturer in clinical psychology in the school of psychology at The University of Queensland, Australia. As a researcher, she has specific interests in grief and loss, trauma emotion regulation, and anxiety. Her specific work is mechanism focused, and she has amassed a journal article catalog of over 45 entries. Jenny Rudolph is the senior director of innovation at the Center for Medical Simulation. She has a PhD in organizational behavior from Boston College and has specific interests in healthcare education and collaboration at point of care.

View all posts by Melanie Barlow, Bernadette Watson, Elizabeth Jones, Kate J. Morse, Fiona Maccallum, and Jenny Rudolph

Related Articles

We Disagree to Agree: A Call to Apply Agreement Metrics More Extensively for Advancing Management Theory
Business and Management INK
July 25, 2024

We Disagree to Agree: A Call to Apply Agreement Metrics More Extensively for Advancing Management Theory

Read Now
Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events
Business and Management INK
July 23, 2024

Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events

Read Now
Funny or Functional: Customer Engagement in Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Services
Business and Management INK
July 22, 2024

Funny or Functional: Customer Engagement in Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Services

Read Now
‘Push, Pull, Dance’: Public Health Procurement – Saving Lives and Preventing Harm
Business and Management INK
July 18, 2024

‘Push, Pull, Dance’: Public Health Procurement – Saving Lives and Preventing Harm

Read Now
Leading Boards in Chaos and Uncertainty? Have an Enlightened Approach

Leading Boards in Chaos and Uncertainty? Have an Enlightened Approach

This article addresses the pivotal question of what sets well-governed companies apart from those jeopardizing stakeholders’ wealth and well-being, and argues that the key to sustainability and effective governance lies in the presence of an enlightened chair.

Read Now
Studying Leadership Coaching in the Workplace

Studying Leadership Coaching in the Workplace

Tatiana Bachkirova and Peter Jackson reflect on coaching and other factors that led to the publishing of their research article, “What do leaders really want to learn in a workplace? A study of the shifting agendas of leadership coaching,”

Read Now
The Case of Leftist Governments in Chile and Uruguay

The Case of Leftist Governments in Chile and Uruguay

In this article, Juan Bogliaccini and Aldo Madariaga explore leftist governments in peripheral economics — the topic of their recently published article, […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments