Business and Management INK

Utilizing Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Societal Impact

September 17, 2024 538

In this article, co-authors Natalie Slawinski, Bruna Brito, Jennifer Brenton, and Wendy Smith reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Reflections on deep academic–practitioner partnering for generative societal impact,” published in Strategic Organization.

The rising sustainability issues of our times, such as climate change, inequality, and poverty, demand innovative and collaborative solutions. These grand challenges require not only the attention of policymakers and practitioners but also the rigorous engagement of management scholars who can contribute to sustainable and impactful change. Through engaged scholarship, scholars can conduct research on the ground, connecting with, and learning from, those who experience these issues.

Map showing location of Fogo Island in Newfoundland and in North America
Fogo Island (Map: Deeyuso – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=31560090)

In this essay, we reflect on what we call “deep partnering” – an extreme form of engaged scholarship that involves highly interdependent and evolving interactions between partners over an extended time period to address shared goals. We share insights from our long-term collaboration with Shorefast, a nonprofit organization dedicated to revitalizing the community of Fogo Island, Newfoundland, which faced a downward spiral of devitalization after the collapse of the cod industry in the North Atlantic Ocean. In 2013, Shorefast launched the Fogo Island Inn, the first of several social enterprises whose profits were reinvested into Shorefast’s mission “to unleash the power of place so local communities can thrive in the global economy.” Shorefast leveraged and honored the assets of Fogo Island, including its culture and traditions, in their work to build cultural and economic resilience for Fogo Island, and our research partnership helped them to codify and share these lessons with other communities around the world.

Engaging in deep partnering is not an easy task. In our essay, we identify three paradoxes that emerged in the process and that required our careful navigation: First, our research team grappled with the need to maintain professional distance to achieve more objectivity while at the same time being personally involved with Shorefast to better understand the issues they faced and help them develop solutions. Second, we confronted a paradoxical tension between the need for a longer time horizon to conduct rigorous research and looking for ways to help Shorefast with the immediate problems they faced. Finally, we faced a paradox between our goal to publish our generalizable insights in academic journals and helping Shorefast with their need to find specific solutions to the challenges they faced.

Navigating these paradoxes demanded deliberate strategies. To navigate the first paradox, we found comfort with the discomfort.  We embraced the uncomfortable emotions surfaced by our personal involvement while pursuing objectivity recognizing that trust and support from our partners could only be built through genuine engagement. To address the second, we took a patient approach, embracing the uncertainty of spending time in the partner’s world to gain a deep understanding, which, paradoxically, allowed us to develop insights and solutions more rapidly. Finally, to navigate the third paradox we allowed vulnerability, acknowledging the limits of academic knowledge and seeking to learn from Shorefast’s practical experience.

Deep partnering can enable a more impactful, though often challenging, approach to engaged scholarship. It requires continuous negotiation of challenges, but the outcomes can be profoundly generative, extending far beyond the initial partnership to a greater number of stakeholders.  We hope that our experiences and reflections inspire other scholars to pursue deep partnerships with practitioners, recognizing that these relationships can offer important insights into, and solutions to, our world’s grand challenges.

Natalie Slawinski (pictured) is a professor and the Director of the Center for Social and Sustainable Innovation (CSSI) at the University of Victoria's Gustavson Business School. She has areas of expertise in strategy, sustainability, social enterprise. Bruna Brito is a PhD Candidate in Management and Organization at the University of Victoria. She has research interests in research interests include resilience, marginalization, (de)stigmatization, social change, and collective memory. Jennifer Brenton is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow with the Erb Institute for Global Sustainable Enterprise. She earned her PhD in Management from Memorial University of Newfoundland and has research interests in place, social enterprise, community-based enterprise, and cross-sector work. Wendy Smith is the Dana J. Johnson Professor and the Women's Leadership Initiative Faculty Director at the University of Delaware. She received her PhD in organizational behavior at Harvard Business School and has research focuses on strategic paradoxes – how leaders and senior teams effectively respond to contradictory agendas.

View all posts by Natalie Slawinski, Bruna Brito, Jennifer Brenton, and Wendy Smith

Related Articles

Trippin’ Forward: Management Research and the Development of Psychedelics
Business and Management INK
September 9, 2024

Trippin’ Forward: Management Research and the Development of Psychedelics

Read Now
Using Ethnography to Explore Entrepreneurial Extracurricular Activities
Business and Management INK
September 6, 2024

Using Ethnography to Explore Entrepreneurial Extracurricular Activities

Read Now
The Future of Business is Interdisciplinary 
Interdisciplinarity
September 5, 2024

The Future of Business is Interdisciplinary 

Read Now
The Co-Creation Edge in Marketing Education
Business and Management INK
August 19, 2024

The Co-Creation Edge in Marketing Education

Read Now
Book Review: Exploring, Understanding, and Managing Organizational Paradoxes

Book Review: Exploring, Understanding, and Managing Organizational Paradoxes

In this article, V Kalyani provides brief insights into her recently published book review, entitled “Book Review: Organizational Paradox,” published in Management Communication […]

Read Now
Enhancing Cultural Intelligence in Organizations: A Strategic Approach

Enhancing Cultural Intelligence in Organizations: A Strategic Approach

In this blog post, co-authors Alexey Semenov and Arilova Randrianasolo reflect on their interest in the intersection between organization and cultural intelligence. This […]

Read Now
Machine Learning Research Requires Smaller Sample Sizes than Previously Thought

Machine Learning Research Requires Smaller Sample Sizes than Previously Thought

In this post, authors Louis Hickman, Josh Liff, Caleb Rottman, and Charles Calderwood outline the inspiration behind their recently published academic paper, […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments